Kraken wins Federal Reserve Master Account in industry first

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-04Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-04

Анотація

Kraken Financial, the banking subsidiary of the Kraken cryptocurrency exchange, has secured a limited-purpose Federal Reserve master account from the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. This makes it the first crypto-native firm to gain direct access to the U.S. central bank's core payment infrastructure. The account, approved for an initial one-year term, allows Kraken to process fiat currency deposits and withdrawals for digital-asset trading without relying on intermediary banks. The approval is subject to restrictions and enhanced scrutiny, as Kraken is classified as a Tier 3 entity under the Fed's framework. This decision marks a significant, though cautious, step by the Federal Reserve, contrasting with its previous denial of a similar application from Custodia Bank in 2023.

Kraken Financial, the banking arm of crypto exchange Kraken, has secured a limited-purpose account with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. They become the first crypto-native firm to gain direct access to the U.S. central bank’s core payment system.

The account, approved for an initial one-year term, allows Kraken Financial to process fiat deposits and withdrawals tied to digital-asset markets without relying on intermediaries.

The approval marks a rare step by the Federal Reserve to grant payment system access to a crypto-focused institution.

The Kansas City Fed said the account was approved under the Federal Reserve’s Account Access Guidelines after assessing Kraken Financial’s business model and risk profile.

Direct access to the Fed’s payment rails

Federal Reserve master accounts allow institutions to access the central bank’s payment infrastructure directly. This enables settlement through the Fed’s core systems rather than through correspondent banks.

For Kraken, this means the exchange’s Wyoming-chartered banking subsidiary can settle fiat transfers itself when moving funds into and out of crypto markets.

Kraken co-CEO Arjun Sethi said the approval improves the reliability and efficiency of fiat settlement tied to digital-asset trading.

“This is a significant milestone for Kraken and for the broader crypto industry,” Sethi said in comments reported by the Wall Street Journal.

“It demonstrates that regulated crypto firms can meet the same standards as traditional banks when it comes to accessing core payment systems.”

Approval comes with restrictions

The Kansas City Fed emphasized that the account is limited in scope and includes restrictions tailored to Kraken Financial’s business model.

Kraken Financial is classified as a Tier 3 entity under the Fed’s account access framework, which applies enhanced scrutiny to nontraditional financial institutions.

The limited-purpose account is subject to ongoing supervision by the Kansas City Fed and Wyoming regulators.

Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid said the approval reflects the evolving nature of payments while maintaining the system’s stability.

“As we know, the payments landscape is actively evolving,” Schmid said, adding that preserving the integrity of the U.S. payments system remains a priority.

A rare win for crypto banking

The decision stands out because the Federal Reserve has historically been cautious about granting master accounts to crypto-focused institutions.

In 2023, the Fed denied a similar application from Wyoming-based Custodia Bank, citing concerns about risks tied to digital asset activities.

Kraken Financial, which operates as a Wyoming Special Purpose Depository Institution [SPDI], launched in 2021 to provide crypto-focused banking services, including custody and settlement.

The approval signals that some regulated crypto firms may now be able to access core U.S. payment infrastructure directly. However, the Fed said all account decisions are made on a case-by-case basis following a risk-based review.


Final Summary

  • Kraken Financial has become the first crypto-native firm to obtain a Federal Reserve master account, allowing limited direct access to the Fed’s payment systems.
  • The approval remains restricted and subject to supervision. It reflects the Fed’s cautious approach to integrating crypto institutions into the U.S. banking infrastructure.

Пов'язані матеріали

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit59 хв тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit59 хв тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1 год тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片