Justin Sun-Linked Wallets Accumulate $40M Worth of LIT

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-02Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-02

Анотація

A number of wallets associated with Justin Sun have accumulated a significant amount of LIT tokens, the native asset of the Lighter decentralized exchange. On-chain analysis reveals that four wallets linked to Sun purchased 1.6 million LIT shortly after the token’s launch, eventually accumulating a total of 14.89 million LIT—valued at approximately $39.8 million. The activity was tied to liquidity provisioning rather than airdrop farming, with around $200 million deposited into Lighter’s Liquidity Provider Program. Sun now holds about 5.32% of the circulating supply. LIT launched on December 30 as part of a futures DEX on Ethereum zk-rollup, with 25% allocated to early users and liquidity providers. The token experienced volatility post-launch, dropping about 30% from its initial trading price of $3.40.

A number of wallets associated with Just Sun have silently made a quite large place in the newly launched LIT token by Lighter. The on-chain data has revealed that the purchases were linked to liquidity provisioning instead of airdrop farming.

The on-chain researcher MLM released its analysis on Jan 1, revealing that 4 wallets linked with Justin Sun accumulated 1.6 million LIT soon after the token generation event, taking the amount to about 6.4 million LIT, whose value is said to be around $17 million as per the current market rate.

The wallets’ funding took place 34 and 50 minutes after the closing of the Lighter airdrop allocation form. However, there is no proof that the wallets also participated in earlier points farming.

Adding more to this, the activity deposits around $200 million into the Lighter’s Liquidity Provider Program. Further, he took out about $38 million, using around $33 million to buy an extra 13.25 million LIT on the market. Totalling this, the wallets now have 14.89 million LIT, sitting at $39.8 million.

A Dig Into LIT

With this, Sun has around 5.32% of the circulating supply and 1.33% of the total supply. About $5.5 million stays in spot balances associated with the same group of wallets. The data has also dropped hints that similar arrangements may persist for other big LLP participants. A wallet deposited $50 million USDC in the programme and, after around a month, got 874,875 LIT via attribution.

Lighter rolled out LIT on December 30, an efficient, long-lasting futures DEX made as an Ethereum zk-rollup. With the launch, 25% was launched to early users and liquidity providers, quickly taking the circulating supply to around 250 million tokens.

After the launch, LIT is under the pressure because of liquidity withdrawals and post-airdrop profit-taking, which usually can be seen for new tokens having wide distributions. The debut price stood at around $3.40 at the time of initial trading but soon experienced volatility, falling around 30% to $2.45-$2.80.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Jupiter Launches Mobile V3 With Native Pro Trading Tools

Пов'язані питання

QHow much LIT did the wallets linked to Justin Sun accumulate, and what is its approximate value?

AThe wallets linked to Justin Sun accumulated 14.89 million LIT, with an approximate value of $39.8 million.

QWhat was the primary purpose of the purchases made by the Justin Sun-linked wallets according to on-chain data?

AAccording to on-chain data, the purchases were linked to liquidity provisioning, not airdrop farming.

QWhat percentage of the circulating and total supply of LIT does Justin Sun now hold?

AJustin Sun holds approximately 5.32% of the circulating supply and 1.33% of the total supply of LIT.

QWhen was the LIT token launched, and what is Lighter?

ALighter rolled out the LIT token on December 30. Lighter is an efficient, long-lasting futures DEX built as an Ethereum zk-rollup.

QWhat happened to the price of LIT shortly after its launch?

AShortly after its launch, the price of LIT experienced volatility, falling around 30% from its debut price of approximately $3.40 to a range of $2.45-$2.80 due to liquidity withdrawals and post-airdrop profit-taking.

Пов'язані матеріали

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

A US law enforcement task force has frozen over $700 million in cryptocurrency linked to investment scams targeting Americans. The operation, which involved cooperation from crypto exchanges and legal processes, also took down more than 500 fraudulent websites and a Telegram channel used to recruit victims. Two Chinese nationals were named in arrest warrants for operating a scam compound in Burma. In a related move, the US State Department announced a $10 million reward for information disrupting scam centers in Burma. Singaporean authorities, alongside major crypto exchanges and analytics firms, also prevented nearly $3 million in losses through a parallel operation. The scale of cybercrime remains vast, with the FBI reporting over $20 billion in losses in 2025.

bitcoinist51 хв тому

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

bitcoinist51 хв тому

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that the Toncoin (TON) network will reduce transaction fees by six times in one week, lowering the cost to just 0.00039 TON (approximately $0.0005). This fee reduction is part of the "Make TON Great Again" (MTONGA) roadmap and will remain fixed regardless of network congestion. The update follows a recent upgrade that made the network 10 times faster and transactions nearly instant. Durov also hinted that future steps aim to make most transactions fully feeless. Although Telegram discontinued formal involvement with TON due to regulatory issues, Durov remains a strong supporter. Currently, Toncoin is trading around $1.30, down over 8% in the past week.

bitcoinist1 год тому

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

bitcoinist1 год тому

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit1 год тому

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit1 год тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit2 год тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit2 год тому

Analyst Reveals Accumulation Level For Dogecoin Before It Rallies To $2

A crypto analyst, Crypto Patel, predicts that Dogecoin (DOGE) could rally to $2, despite currently trading below $0.10. The analyst identifies a key accumulation zone between $0.07 and $0.09, where DOGE has repeatedly tested support without breaking down. Based on a bi-weekly chart using Elliott Wave theory, DOGE is in a Wave 4 consolidation phase within a descending channel. A bounce from this support is expected to trigger a Wave 5 rally, projecting a 2,767% surge toward $2. Price targets are set sequentially at $0.50, $1, and $2, with a stop-loss below $0.048. For a bullish trend reversal, DOGE must break above the $0.10 resistance level, which was recently rejected in April. Analysts emphasize that market conditions and a confirmed higher high are critical for the projected uptrend.

bitcoinist2 год тому

Analyst Reveals Accumulation Level For Dogecoin Before It Rallies To $2

bitcoinist2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни SUN (SUN).