Justin Sun Accused of TRX Price Manipulation by Alleged Ex-Girlfriend

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-02Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-02

Анотація

Justin Sun, founder of Tron, is accused by a woman named Ten Ten, who claims to be his ex-girlfriend, of manipulating the price of TRX. She alleges that Sun used employee identities to operate Binance accounts in 2017 and 2018 to conduct coordinated buying and selling, artificially inflating TRX's price and market cap. After the price surge, insiders allegedly sold off holdings for profit, causing losses to investors. Ten Ten claims to have extensive evidence, including WeChat records, emails, and exchange logs, and has named 12 other individuals involved. She states she is prepared to fully cooperate with a U.S. SEC investigation.

The founder of Tron, Justin Sun, has been alleged by a woman, Ten Ten, who claims to be his ex-girlfriend. Ten has shared a number of posts on X claiming to manipulate the TRX price.

After the post, attention has been directed towards the claims, and the demand for stricter action from law enforcement agencies has surged. Ten Ten is standing by her words and has also clarified that she is not making any baseless allegations and alleges to have extensive evidence.

She has also claimed that Justin Sun has used the identities of various employees in Beijing to run Binance accounts in late 2017 and 2018. As per her statements, these accounts were then used to run coordinated buying and selling of TRX to further surge the price.

She claimed that all this planning was done to artificially surge the price and market capitalisation of TRX. After the price surged, large-scale sell-offs happened, permitting insiders to profit, and at the same time, investors went through losses.

Not only this, but Sun also used media exposure and public hype to create excitement around TRX. The build image consisted of innovation and success; however, the reality revolved around insider trading and coordinated trades.

The Concrete Evidence

She also mentioned that insider trading and coordinated trades were one of the factors playing an important role in increasing the wealth of Justin Sun. She also revealed the names of 12 other people involved from mainland China, claiming that they worked under Justin Sun and were involved in such activities.

She highlighted that she was silent for years because of fear, saying money and influence, but that fear is not anymore. She also joked that “I also have an Epstein file of the crypto world.”

In the end, Ten Ten also assured that she is prepared to cooperate completely with an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. She stated that she has WeChat records, emails, exchange activity logs and much more evidence to back her allegations.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Hong Kong Aims to Act as Global Connector Between Crypto and Traditional Finance

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is Justin Sun accused of by his alleged ex-girlfriend, Ten Ten?

AJustin Sun is accused of manipulating the price of TRX through coordinated buying and selling, using employee identities to run Binance accounts, and engaging in insider trading to artificially inflate the token's price and market capitalization.

QWhat specific methods did Ten Ten claim were used to manipulate the TRX price?

AShe claimed that Justin Sun used the identities of employees in Beijing to operate Binance accounts for coordinated buying and selling of TRX, combined with media exposure and public hype to create artificial excitement.

QWhat evidence does Ten Ten allege she has to support her claims?

ATen Ten alleges she has extensive evidence including WeChat records, emails, exchange activity logs, and knowledge of 12 other individuals involved from mainland China.

QWhy did Ten Ten say she remained silent about these allegations for years?

AShe stated she remained silent due to fear of Justin Sun's money and influence, but that fear is no longer present.

QWhat action has Ten Ten proposed to take regarding these allegations?

ATen Ten has assured that she is prepared to fully cooperate with an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Пов'язані матеріали

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

NVIDIA's investment strategy operates through a "three-track architecture," not just its NVentures venture arm. Corporate Development handles massive strategic bets (e.g., $30B in OpenAI, $10B in Anthropic, $20B in Synopsys). NVentures, a small team, focuses on early-stage, financial investments across sectors like quantum computing (Alice & Bob, PsiQuantum), AI infrastructure (OpenRouter, Tensormesh), and biotech. The NVIDIA Inception accelerator provides non-monetary support. This system allows NVIDIA to nurture startups and lock in strategic partners, creating a vast AI ecosystem. This aggressive capital deployment has drawn scrutiny. Critics like Michael Burry and EU regulators question potential "circular financing," where NVIDIA's equity investments in companies (e.g., CoreWeave, OpenAI) facilitate those companies' purchases of NVIDIA hardware, potentially inflating revenue. Supporters view it as a necessary "virtuous cycle" to secure supply and demand in a compute-scarce market. While NVentures' smaller deals appear like traditional VC, its role within the larger, controversial investment framework remains a point of debate.

marsbit21 хв тому

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

marsbit21 хв тому

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit22 хв тому

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit22 хв тому

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit52 хв тому

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit52 хв тому

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn55 хв тому

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn55 хв тому

Blockchain Association Urges Senate To Pass CLARITY Act With Letter Backed By 160 Ex-Officials

The Blockchain Association, along with 160 former national security and law enforcement officials, has urged Senate leaders to pass the CLARITY Act. They argue that without clear federal regulation, crypto activity will move to opaque offshore markets, hindering U.S. efforts to combat financial crime. The letter highlights that the Act would strengthen law enforcement by expanding anti-money laundering and sanctions requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act, improving information sharing between agencies like the Treasury, DOJ, and FBI, and enhancing oversight of digital asset kiosks with measures like transaction monitoring and fraud prevention. The Association emphasizes these are enforcement enhancements, not deregulation. Momentum for the bill is building, with a Senate vote expected this summer, though it would still need reconciliation with a previously passed House version.

bitcoinist1 год тому

Blockchain Association Urges Senate To Pass CLARITY Act With Letter Backed By 160 Ex-Officials

bitcoinist1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни SUN (SUN).