Juliana Stratton Defeats Crypto-Backed Krishnamoorthi in Illinois Senate Primary

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-18Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-18

Анотація

Illinois Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton won the Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate, defeating Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, who had significant financial backing from crypto-related groups. The super PAC Fairshake, among others, contributed nearly $10 million to Krishnamoorthi’s campaign, largely funding attack ads against Stratton. Stratton, strongly endorsed by Governor JB Pritzker, criticized her opponent’s support from “MAGA-backed crypto bros” and received an "F" rating from crypto advocacy groups due to her lack of support for cryptocurrency legislation. The race highlights the growing influence of crypto funding in U.S. political campaigns. Stratton is favored to win the general election against Republican Don Tracy in the solidly Democratic state.

Illinois Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton will become the state’s next Senator after she won the Democratic primary Tuesday night and defeated Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi. Senator Dick Durbin brought the race into the national spotlight when he announced his retirement, creating a competitive political environment. Illinois Governor JB Pritzker strongly backed Stratton by supporting her campaign through donations and endorsements.

According to The Washington Post, Krishnamoorthi had entered the race with substantial backing from crypto-related groups, including the super PAC organization Fairshake. Reports indicated that Fairshake and other related entities contributed nearly ten million dollars to his campaign. However, Fairshake directed much of its spending toward advertisements attacking Stratton rather than promoting Krishnamoorthi directly.

Crypto Funding Influence and Campaign Strategies

The strategy indicates a broader approach that groups used during the 2024 election cycle in other competitive political races. Stand With Crypto, a Coinbase-backed advocacy group, rates candidates based on their stances on cryptocurrency-related issues and developments. Stratton received an “F” rating based on her statement that mentioned her opponent’s support coming from “MAGA-backed crypto bros.” She also failed to support any legislation related to cryptocurrencies and failed to provide detailed policy positions.

Fairshake’s spokesperson, Geoff Vetter, issued a statement that congratulated various pro-crypto candidates on their victories in other contests across the country. He said, “We congratulate pro-crypto leaders like Donna Miller, Melissa Bean, and Rep. Nikki Budzinski.” Vetter went on to say that Fairshake is still dedicated to supporting candidates who align with innovation and policies across America. He said that voters chose more pro-crypto representatives, but that they will continue with their efforts.

Crypto Influence Expands in U.S. Election Campaigns

The Illinois Senate race has been given a rating of “Solid Democratic” by the Cook Political Report. This indicates that Democrats enjoy wide support across the state. The analysts predict that Stratton will enjoy an advantage going into the general election, which is scheduled for later this year against Republican candidate Don Tracy. This is an example of how cryptocurrency funding is being linked with politics.

The finding also serves as a reminder that cryptocurrency-based funding continues to play a significant role in shaping contemporary political campaigns. As the general election draws near, there is much interest in how cryptocurrency policy stances will change as more cryptocurrency players enter U.S. politics.

Highlighted Crypto News
CoinSwitch Launches Digivault to Address Growing Demand for Crypto Custody

TagsBlockchainCoinbasecrypto politicsCryptocurrencySenatorU.S Senate

Пов'язані питання

QWho won the Illinois Democratic Senate primary and who did they defeat?

AJuliana Stratton won the Illinois Democratic Senate primary and defeated Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi.

QWhat was the name of the super PAC that supported Krishnamoorthi and what was its strategy?

AThe super PAC was called Fairshake. Its strategy involved spending heavily on advertisements attacking Juliana Stratton rather than directly promoting Krishnamoorthi.

QWhy did Juliana Stratton receive an 'F' rating from the crypto advocacy group Stand With Crypto?

AShe received an 'F' rating because she failed to support any cryptocurrency-related legislation, did not provide detailed policy positions on the issue, and referred to her opponent's supporters as 'MAGA-backed crypto bros'.

QWhat is the Cook Political Report's rating for the Illinois Senate race and what does it indicate?

AThe Cook Political Report rates the Illinois Senate race as 'Solid Democratic,' which indicates that Democrats enjoy wide support across the state and that Stratton is predicted to have an advantage in the general election.

QAccording to the article, what is the broader significance of the funding in this primary race?

AIt is an example of how cryptocurrency funding is becoming linked with politics and continues to play a significant role in shaping contemporary political campaigns in the U.S.

Пов'язані матеріали

MoneyGram: Why Did We Launch Our Own Stablecoin?

MoneyGram, a global leader in cross-border remittances for over 80 years, has launched its own stablecoin, MGUSD. The initiative aims to evolve from single-transaction services to becoming a more integral part of users' financial lives. By allowing customers to hold a stable US dollar balance within the MoneyGram app, MGUSD enables not only remittances but also everyday spending, currency exchange, cash access, and future financial services. Targeting the billions globally who face challenges like currency volatility or lack of bank accounts, MGUSD leverages Stellar blockchain technology with a self-custody wallet architecture. This gives users control over their assets while providing a secure, compliant experience through a trusted brand. The approach focuses on solving existing customer pain points within MoneyGram's established network, rather than competing for broad crypto market liquidity. A key advantage is MoneyGram's hybrid model, combining digital services with the world's largest physical network for crypto-to-cash conversions. The stablecoin also modernizes the company's internal infrastructure, streamlining treasury management and partner settlements, with annual forex volume via stablecoins already reaching $2 billion. The project was delivered in about a year, driven by a reorganization into agile, cross-functional teams that operate with startup-like speed while leveraging decades of institutional expertise. Partners include Stablecoin (issuance), Crossmint (wallet APIs), Fireblocks (enterprise treasury), m0 (smart contracts), and the Stellar network. MoneyGram emphasizes that enhancing direct consumer offerings strengthens its partner ecosystem. The future direction is clear: to provide users worldwide with stable value storage, better financial tools, and greater control over their funds through a trusted, existing network.

Foresight News6 хв тому

MoneyGram: Why Did We Launch Our Own Stablecoin?

Foresight News6 хв тому

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Bitcoin is approaching a critical block height of 961,632, which could activate the controversial BIP-110 proposal. This proposal aims to restrict the amount of non-financial data, such as inscriptions and other large data payloads, within Bitcoin transactions. Supporters, including some node operators and Bitcoin purists, argue that BIP-110 is necessary to preserve Bitcoin's core function as a monetary settlement layer by reducing network congestion and node operational burdens caused by non-essential data. They frame it as a correction to keep the network true to its original purpose. However, critics, including prominent figures like Blockstream's Adam Back and developer Jameson Lopp, warn that the proposal's implementation mechanism is dangerously flawed. They highlight that its low 55% miner signaling threshold, coupled with a contentious enforcement mechanism allowing nodes to unilaterally reject non-compliant blocks, significantly increases the risk of a chain split. Opponents argue this sets a dangerous precedent for transaction censorship, undermines Bitcoin's protocol neutrality, and creates excessive uncertainty for developers and businesses, especially since the rule is proposed as a temporary one-year measure. Market analysts, such as those from Bitfinex, suggest a full-scale network split is unlikely due to a lack of broad economic consensus. Major mining pools remain neutral, and adoption of the new rules is minimal. They view the situation more as a governance stress test. The primary risk is operational disruption: if a minority chain persists, major exchanges and custodians may need to temporarily suspend Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals to manage security and liquidity, potentially unsettling newer institutional investors. While BIP-110 is not expected to succeed in overtaking the main chain, its approach has ignited a significant debate about Bitcoin's governance, core values, and resilience.

Foresight News43 хв тому

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Foresight News43 хв тому

NEAR to Airdrop 330,000 Tokens, Betting on TVL Reaching $70 Million

On June 11th, NEAR Protocol launched the Near@3.33 Milestone Incentive Program, targeting users of its Confidential Intents privacy cross-chain execution feature. The program will distribute 333,333 milestone tokens when the Confidential Intents Total Value Locked (TVL) reaches $70 million. Users must have conducted Confidential transactions on near.com and maintain a Confidential balance above $100 in any asset to qualify, with a single wallet capped at 2% of the current airdrop pool. The milestone tokens will be locked upon receipt and cannot be sold or transferred. They can only be converted 1:1 to NEAR tokens once NEAR's Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) maintains $3.33 or higher for three consecutive trading days. As of the report, Confidential Intents TVL exceeds $20.69 million, needing roughly a 3x increase to trigger the airdrop. Confidential Intents, launched in February 2026, is NEAR's privacy execution layer designed to prevent MEV, front-running, and strategy leaks by building confidentiality directly into the execution environment. Its TVL has grown from zero to approximately $15 million in about three months. NEAR token price, which surged from around $1 in April to a peak of $3.08, currently trades near $2. The program aims to boost user activity for Confidential Intents, with future incentive rounds planned as community engagement increases.

Foresight News2 год тому

NEAR to Airdrop 330,000 Tokens, Betting on TVL Reaching $70 Million

Foresight News2 год тому

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

**Summary: Crypto Market Makers Adapt as Margins Shrink** Leading crypto market maker GSR exemplifies a broader industry shift, moving beyond traditional market-making to become a full-service "Web3 investment bank." Its recent strategic acquisitions—including an SEC-registered broker-dealer, rebranded as GSR Securities—and purchases of token advisory firms aim to create an integrated platform covering token design, fundraising, listing, liquidity provision, and asset management. This includes launching an ETF and investing in tokenization platforms like Libeara, backed by a strategic investment from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures. This transformation is not unique to GSR. Other major players like Keyrock, B2C2, Wintermute, and DWF Labs are also expanding geographically, pursuing regulatory licenses (especially under frameworks like MiCA in the EU), and diversifying into over-the-counter (OTC) trading, asset management, and real-world asset tokenization. The driving force behind this collective pivot is a rapidly changing market. Profits from traditional altcoin market-making are declining due to fewer viable projects, reduced client budgets, increased competition, and smarter, more demanding clients. Simultaneously, regulatory pressures are mounting, making compliance a baseline cost. Extreme market events further expose teams lacking robust risk controls. Consequently, the crypto market-making business model is evolving from one reliant on information asymmetry and volatility to a more institutionalized, regulated, and service-diverse industry. Survival now depends on building systemic capabilities beyond mere liquidity provision.

marsbit2 год тому

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片