Judgment from a Crypto VC: The Final Stop is Here, All Passengers Please Disembark

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-28Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-28

Анотація

A crypto VC firm declares the end of the line: the era driven by retail speculation and crypto-native ideology is over. The future belongs to the large-scale, institutional adoption of blockchain technology, stripped of its decentralized ethos. While retail became distracted by memecoins, major institutions—banks, payment giants—entered en masse, recognizing blockchain's unparalleled efficiency for value transfer. Their goal isn't to embrace decentralization but to build proprietary, controlled networks, adopting the technology while discarding its foundational philosophy. This marks the transition from a "crypto industry" to a "digital asset economy"—a foundational layer powering mainstream finance, not a separate rebellion. Trillions in assets are poised for tokenization, but largely through traditional, regulated channels. For builders and investors, the old playbook of launching low-float, high-FDV tokens for retail speculation is dead. The new imperative is to build robust infrastructure that serves institutional needs: compliance, security, and seamless integration into existing financial systems. The real opportunity lies not in fighting this shift but in enabling it, as institutions become the primary conduit for onboarding the next billion users and tokenizing the next hundred trillion dollars in assets. The game has fundamentally changed.

Author: Avishay Ovadia (Founding Partner, Collider)

Compiled by: TechFlow

TechFlow Introduction: Collider is an Israeli crypto VC. Although not a large fund, its views can reflect some judgments from upstream industry practitioners.

Its Founding Partner Avishay Ovadia wrote an article on the direction of the crypto industry: The era of retail investors is over. Institutions are not here to 'embrace decentralization'; they are here to take apart the components.

They want blockchain's efficiency, not crypto's ideology. For entrepreneurs and investors, the old playbook is obsolete. The rules of the digital asset economy have completely changed.

Main Text:

For a decade, we told ourselves a fairy tale.

We believed mass adoption of crypto would be a bottom-up revolution. Ordinary people, retail investors, would grow tired of banks, swallow the orange pill, and migrate to a permissionless utopia.

Last year, that fantasy was permanently disproven.

The visitors flooding in were not the users we expected; they were gamblers. They weren't looking for a new financial system; they were looking for a casino with higher leverage. They traded memecoins, took profit from each other, and disappeared into the shadows when the music stopped.

But while retail was busy losing money on memecoins, something more important happened. Those 'giants'—institutions, banks, payment behemoths—did not leave. They went all in.

They weren't here because they believed in decentralization. They discovered blockchain is the most efficient pipeline for moving value ever created. They weren't chasing a technological ideal; they were chasing profits. Larry Fink recently said tokenization is one of two major trends reshaping financial services. We are no longer talking about a niche market, but a $140 trillion transformation.

The Great Transfer of Power

We handed over the keys to the kingdom ourselves. We built the infrastructure, validated the concepts, and then the incumbents came to harvest the territory.

We suffered from immense hubris. We thought we could change them. We thought Bitcoin's miracle could be replicated for any altcoin. We thought they would eventually buy our useless governance tokens, our ghost-town L1s and L2s, and play by our rules. We were wrong. For institutions, relinquishing control isn't 'progress'; it's suicide. Their business models are built on control.

So they didn't come to play in our mud. The vast majority of institutions won't join our DAOs, nor care about our 'community vibes'. They are building their own walled gardens, joining ecosystems like Canton, Zero, Tempo, Kinexys, building orchestration layers that connect traditional platforms to new chains. They are using blockchain, tokenization, instant settlement, self-custody, but stripping away the 'crypto' skin.

They are keeping user privacy, data silos, and profits. They are taking our open-source code, forking our protocols, but not buying our tokens. Swallowing the technology, spitting out the ideology.

The Game's Evolutionary Path

The game has evolved along a predictable, chaotic trajectory to this final station today.

From 2009 to 2014 was the Bitcoin Anarchists phase, a small group of cypherpunks tinkering on the fringe. Then came the Crypto Industry phase, with Ethereum and smart contracts taking center stage. By the 2018 bear market, the narrative shifted to Blockchain Technology, with enterprises trying to unbundle the ledger from the asset, but failing. Then came the rise and spectacular collapse of Web3, with NFTs, GameFi, and the creator economy shining briefly until FTX imploded and turned off all the lights. In 2024, propelled by an election year and the Trump candidacy, the Crypto Industry made a glorious return, only to slide into a season of greed, disgust, and toxicity.

Now, in this new bear market, we have finally arrived at the destination we've been racing towards: the Digital Asset Economy.

This is the final stop. Crypto is no longer an 'industry'; it has become an infrastructure layer. It is the invisible engine powering the world of fintech. It's not crypto eating Wall Street; it's Wall Street eating us.

This is Actually Good News

If you're a purist, this feels like betrayal. If you're a strategist, this is where the real money is.

We have finally reached the node where trillions of dollars are waiting to be deployed. We have entered the 'Distributor Era'. Big money doesn't move without regulation, KYC, and bank-sanctioned rails. DTCC announcing it will tokenize assets held by DTC and support liquid assets like the Russell 1000 index—this isn't a pilot; it's the sound of the floodgates opening.

We are about to tokenize every asset on Earth, from real estate to private credit to government bonds. But most of it won't happen through decentralized swaps on public chains. It will happen through payment giants and banks.

Operating the Machine

Two paths. You can sit in a corner and cry 'the crypto spirit is dead,' or you can recognize we just won the biggest war in financial history. We convinced the world this technology works. Now, we have to build for the people who actually have the capital to use it.

The future of this industry isn't in vaporware tokens. It's embedded in the hard infrastructure serving the new players. It's running today: look at the institutional-grade solutions already broadcasting trillions of dollars in transactions on-chain, trading billions between institutions, tokenizing billions in assets. This is the new application layer.

The New Playbook

Stop being a 'crypto bro.' Start thinking like a fintech veteran.

Think: If every asset on Earth is tokenized, what competitive advantage does buying your particular 'crypto' token have? If you can trade any global asset 24/7, with instant settlement, through a trusted traditional broker, why would you send money to an offshore exchange or sweat over a non-custodial wallet? Why worry about hacks and total loss, instead of trading easily and safely through your existing financial dashboard?

Entrepreneurs, don't build in a vacuum. Before writing the first line of code, visit every distribution link in the chain. Understand their needs, dive deep into their fears: fear of regulatory crackdowns, fear of losing control, fear of unmanageable security incidents. Your job is to create something they can't build themselves but fits perfectly into their existing world.

Investors, the old playbook is dead. The days of early investing in low-float, high-FDV vaporware and praying for retail to provide a 100x exit are over. Digital asset investing is becoming brutally hard. We are moving towards real sales cycles, real utility, and revenue-generating businesses. You need to invest in projects with real moats in a world of open-source technology. 99.99% of tokens don't have that. Finding projects with strong moats, top-tier teams, real usage, token value accrual, institutional adoption, reasonable valuations, healthy vesting schedules, active communities, high liquidity, risk management capabilities, and market opportunity is hard. But it can be done.

Stop fighting the institutions. They *are* the new distribution channels. They will bring the next billion users and the next $100 trillion into the digital asset economy. Even if those users have no idea they're using a blockchain.

The game has changed. The players are bigger. The stakes are higher. Welcome to the final stop. What you do next is up to you.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the author from Collider VC, what marks the end of the 'crypto fairytale' and the start of a new era?

AThe influx of speculators chasing memecoins and the full-scale entry of large institutions like banks and payment giants, who are adopting blockchain for its efficiency while stripping away its ideological 'crypto' layer, mark the end of the old narrative. This signals the arrival of the 'digital asset economy' era.

QWhat is the author's view on how traditional institutions are adopting blockchain technology?

AThe author believes traditional institutions are not embracing the decentralized, permissionless ideology of crypto. Instead, they are 'harvesting the territory' by taking the open-source technology, forking protocols, and building their own walled-garden ecosystems (like Canton, Zero) to gain efficiency, control, privacy, and profit without buying into the native crypto tokens or communities.

QWhat does the author identify as the 'final destination' for the evolution of the crypto space?

AThe 'final destination' is the 'Digital Asset Economy,' where crypto/blockchain ceases to be a standalone industry and becomes an invisible foundational engine powering the broader financial technology world. It's characterized by the large-scale tokenization of all assets through traditional financial gatekeepers.

QWhat new advice does the author give to entrepreneurs in this new 'digital asset economy'?

AThe author advises entrepreneurs to stop building in a vacuum. They must thoroughly understand the needs and fears (like regulatory risk, loss of control) of traditional distribution channels (banks, payment giants) before writing code. They should build solutions that seamlessly integrate into the existing financial world, serving as the hard infrastructure for these new, powerful players.

QHow has the investment thesis changed for venture capitalists according to the article?

AThe old model of investing in low-float, high-FDV tokens hoping for retail-driven 100x pumps is dead. Investment now requires finding projects with real moats in an open-source world, genuine utility, revenue, institutional adoption, reasonable valuations, healthy tokenomics, and active communities. It's about backing real businesses in the digital asset economy, not speculative assets.

Пов'язані матеріали

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit37 хв тому

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit37 хв тому

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit43 хв тому

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit43 хв тому

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit43 хв тому

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit43 хв тому

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报52 хв тому

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报52 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片