Is There More to Kyle Samani's Exit from the Crypto World?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2026-02-10Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-10

Анотація

Kyle Samani, co-founder of Multicoin Capital, recently announced his departure from the crypto industry, sparking controversy due to his subsequent critical remarks. Shortly after leaving, he expressed disillusionment with Web3 and blockchain, claiming they are merely financial ledgers with limited impact—a statement he quickly deleted. He later attacked Hyperliquid, accusing it of facilitating crime and operating opaquely, which many viewed as hypocritical given his past success and influence in crypto. This abrupt shift has led to speculation about underlying reasons for his exit. Analysts note that Multicoin Capital continues investing in Hyperliquid, and co-founder Tushar Jain included it in the firm’s future investment themes, while omitting Samani’s favored DePIN sector. Some, like Ran Neuner, suggest Samani may have been forced out due to internal conflicts, possibly bound by non-compete clauses. Despite Samani’s exit, other industry leaders like Tushar Jain, Haseeb Qureshi, and Chris Dixon reaffirm their belief in crypto’s future. They argue that the industry is maturing, moving from pioneers to builders, and compare its evolution to the early internet—foundational infrastructure must precede broader applications. The consensus remains that crypto’s narrative and potential are far from exhausted.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

Just days after Multicoin Capital co-founder Kyle Samani announced his exit from the crypto industry, the goodwill he had accumulated over the years has rapidly eroded.

"Burning Bridges" Is Truly Disgusting

Objectively speaking, Kyle Samani has made positive contributions to the cryptocurrency industry over the years. Whether it's the continuous financial support for early-stage projects (regardless of motive, focusing on the effect) or the narrative guidance and ideological evangelism at the conceptual level, he has directly or indirectly influenced the industry's direction.

From a purely results-oriented perspective, Kyle Samani indeed achieved unimaginable "major results" in the crypto industry. For this reason alone, it's quite reasonable for Hasseb Qureshi to call him the "best investor in the industry" or for Mable to refer to him as a "top player."

  • Odaily Note: Hasseb Qureshi is a partner at Dragonfly Capital. He once stated that "investing is like a sport, and Kyle Samani is the highest scorer of all time, unmatched," details in 《The Man Who Best Shilled SOL Exits the Crypto World》; Mable is a former partner at Multicoin Capital and co-founder of Trends. After Kyle Samani's exit, she wrote a viral article 《The Game Continues, But Kyle's Version Is Over》.

But precisely because of this, the "ugly face" Kyle Samani has frequently shown in the days since his exit is even more repulsive.

First, on the day of his exit, while replying to Stix founder Taran, Kyle Samani stated: "Crypto just isn't as interesting as many people (including myself) once thought. I used to believe in the Web3 vision, believe in DApps, but now I don't. Blockchains are fundamentally asset ledgers. They will reshape finance, but that's about it, not much more."

This post was quickly deleted by Kyle Samani... Well, clearly this was his true feeling never revealed before, but the fact that he deleted it at least means he knew "burning bridges" wasn't a good look.

But unfortunately, he didn't stop there. On February 8th, Kyle Samani once again lashed out at the industry that made him: "Hyperliquid embodies almost every negative aspect of cryptocurrency. The founders fled their home country to start it, openly facilitating crime and terrorism, the system is closed-source, and it still requires permission."

Although being outspoken has always been a controversial label attached to Kyle Samani, this illogical and clearly factually incorrect "mindless rant" was untenable. Coupled with his new identity as an outsider, the statement seemed even more突兀. In the past, Kyle Samani's outrageous remarks could at least gain some group support based on stance (e.g., siding with Solana, long-term criticism of Ethereum). This time, however, he was standing outside the industry, completely negating the entire crypto sector.

The direction of the fallout was predictable: Kyle Samani successfully provoked widespread anger.

It's understandable for someone who lost money in crypto to criticize it; people always need an emotional outlet. But Kyle Samani, a beneficiary who gained immense wealth and achieved class transition in crypto, couldn't wait to turn around and stomp on it immediately after announcing his exit. This inevitably feels hypocritical and disgusting.

To put it bluntly, this is a classic case of "biting the hand that feeds you" — Kyle Samani wants to take away the benefits bestowed by the industry while eagerly cutting ties with it. How can such a huge便宜 exist?

An Eerie Sense of Incongruity: Is There More to the Exit?

Another very incongruous point is that Kyle Samani chose Hyperliquid as his attack target; on the other hand, Multicoin Capital continues to increase its bet on Hyperliquid.

In the same week Kyle Samani announced his exit, on-chain analyst MLM detected multiple large purchases of HYPE by an address suspected to belong to Multicoin Capital (https://hypurrscan.io/address/0xd4d56a30a4a745f8ba732e8b453b7066260fbc10#txs).

Crypto Banter founder Ran Neuner discovered that in the five-year investment theses published the weekend prior by Multicoin's other co-founder, Tushar Jain, Hyperliquid was prominently listed as a representative project for the third thesis, "Financial Globalization," while DePIN, which Kyle Samani had long been extremely bullish on, was completely absent.

Ran Neuner offered a hypothesis based on this: that Kyle Samani did not leave voluntarily but had conflicts with Tushar Jain, was eventually forced out, and due to non-compete clause restrictions, Kyle Samani had to exit the crypto industry entirely...

Although this speculation lacks any factual evidence, it seems to better explain the aforementioned incongruities and Kyle Samani's sudden attitude shift — Would you rather believe that a top mind long dedicated to the crypto industry suddenly realized its emptiness? Or would you rather believe that Kyle Samani turned his back only because he harbored resentment and could no longer profit from the industry?

Whether out of faith in the industry's future or residual recognition of Kyle Samani's past achievements, emotionally, I lean towards the second possibility. As for the truth, it might only be revealed someday in the future when no one cares about this matter anymore.

No Future for the Crypto Industry?

Over the past few years, we have seen many instances of talent flowing from the crypto world to the AI world, but the exit of a标志性 figure like Kyle Samani has dealt a heavy blow to confidence in the entire crypto industry.

So, does the industry really have no future? This is clearly not a question that can be answered by personal opinion. After Kyle Samani chose to leave, several true thought leaders of comparable stature used their own logic to explain why they remain bullish on the industry's future.

Tushar Jain's信念 remains firm. The eight investment theses he published for Multicoin Capital still focus on the crypto world.

Haseeb Qureshi believes that Kyle Samani's departure is the truest sign of the industry maturing. Pioneers and settlers are often not the same people, this is driven by the laws of human nature — "I remain very bullish on crypto. I know it's strange to say this amidst market turmoil, as people have little patience for dreams that will take a decade to realize. The era of dreamers is over, but the era of builders is coming. This in itself is neither good nor bad."

a16z Crypto partner and Web3 concept pioneer Chris Dixon, drew an analogy with the development规律 of the internet to refute Kyle Samani's view that cryptocurrency can only reshape finance — "Infrastructure and distribution networks often precede new application categories. The internet didn't start with social media, streaming, or online communities, but with packet switching, TCP/IP, and basic connectivity. It was only after hundreds of millions of people came online that entirely new cultural and economic categories emerged. Crypto is likely similar. A reasonable guess is that we need to get hundreds of millions of people on-chain first through financial applications like payments, stablecoins, savings, and DeFi, before we see meaningful adoption in media, gaming, AI, or other areas that might be further out."

The future is created by people. As long as more people share the same consensus, the flame of the crypto narrative can be rekindled.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was Kyle Samani's stated reason for leaving the cryptocurrency industry, as revealed in his deleted post?

AHe stated that he no longer believes in the Web3 vision and DApps, claiming that blockchains are essentially just asset ledgers that will reshape finance and nothing more.

QWhich specific project did Kyle Samani attack after his departure, and what was the nature of his criticism?

AHe attacked Hyperliquid, claiming it 'embodies almost everything wrong with crypto,' accusing it of being founded by people who fled their country, facilitating crime and terrorism, being closed-source, and still requiring permission.

QWhat contradiction or 'weird dissonance' does the article point out regarding Multicoin Capital's actions and Kyle Samani's statements?

AWhile Kyle Samani publicly attacked Hyperliquid, on-chain data showed that Multicoin Capital's address was making large purchases of HYPE (Hyperliquid's token), and his partner Tushar Jain listed Hyperliquid as a key investment theme.

QWhat alternative theory does the article present to explain Kyle Samani's sudden departure and negative comments?

AThe theory is that Kyle Samani did not leave voluntarily but was forced out due to a conflict with his partner Tushar Jain, and his negative comments are a result of his frustration and being bound by a non-compete clause.

QHow do other major industry figures like Chris Dixon and Haseeb Qureshi counter Kyle Samani's pessimistic view on crypto's future?

AChris Dixon compared crypto to the early internet, arguing that financial applications are the foundational infrastructure that will eventually lead to broader adoption in media, gaming, and AI. Haseeb Qureshi stated that the departure of pioneers is a sign of the industry maturing, and the era of builders is now beginning.

Пов'язані матеріали

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报20 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报20 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News37 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News37 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片