Is the $124 Support Critical as Solana (SOL) Bulls Fight to Maintain Control?

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2025-12-08Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-08

Анотація

Solana (SOL) has posted gains amid a mixed crypto market, climbing over 4.8% to trade near $138.73 after testing highs of $139.21. However, analysts highlight a critical support level at $124. A break below could trigger a deeper correction toward $115 or $106. Technical indicators present a mixed outlook: the MACD remains bearish, while the CMF suggests moderate buying pressure. The RSI is neutral at 52.46, and Bull Bear Power shows slight bullish dominance. If bulls regain momentum, SOL could challenge resistance at $142.37 and potentially $146.85. Conversely, increased bearish pressure may push the price toward $134.58 or lower.

With the recent 2.98% spike, the overall crypto market sentiment is wavering between the red and green zones. The major assets are seeking to get charted in a bullish phase. The largest asset, Bitcoin (BTC), hovers at $92.1K while the largest altcoin, Ethereum (ETH), trades near $3.1K. Following suit, Solana (SOL) has posted a gain of over 4.82%.

SOL opened the day trading at a low of $128.29, and with the brief bullish encounter, it has tested a series of resistance levels between $130 and $137. Gradually, the asset has climbed to a high of $139.21. As per the CoinMarketCap data, at the time of writing, Solana traded within the $138.73 mark.

The market cap of the altcoin stays at $77.85 billion, with the daily trading volume of SOL having skyrocketed by over 141.77%, to the $4.86 billion zone. According to the report of Coinglass data, the market has witnessed a liquidation of $31.17 million of Solana in the last 24 hours.

An analyst chart explains that Solana is currently moving sideways, showing a critical support at $124. Losing this level would likely trigger a deeper correction toward these lower zones, with the next strong supports appearing near the $115 and $106 zones.

Can Solana Avoid a Steeper Slide Ahead?

The technical analysis of Solana reports that the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and the signal lines are below the zero line. The overall sentiment is bearish, and any crossover below zero is a weaker bullish signal compared to one that occurs above zero.

The Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator, which is positioned at 0.16, implies that the SOL market has moderate buying pressure. Notably, with this value, the capital is flowing into the asset, but the strength is not extreme — more like steady accumulation rather than aggressive buying.

SOL’s daily Relative Strength Index (RSI), found at 52.46, shows that the market is in a neutral zone, slightly leaning bullish. Also, it gives no overbought or oversold signals, with the price action balanced. Moreover, the Bull Bear Power (BBP) value of 3.30 infers that bullish strength is slightly higher than bearish pressure. It is a mild positive signal, not extremely strong, but supporting the upward price movement.

With the bearish correction in the SOL market, the price might slip sharply to test the key support at $134.58. Assuming the bears gain more strength, the death cross could unfold, and the bears may drive the asset’s price below the $130 range.

Conversely, if the Solana bulls regain the lost momentum, the price could move up toward the nearby $142.37 resistance. Further correction on the upside might initiate the golden cross to take place, and trigger the bulls to send the price above $146.85.

Top Updated Crypto News

Bulls in Action: Can Ethereum (ETH) Break the $3.5K Resistance?

TagsAltcoinCryptocurrencySOLSOL PriceSolana

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

Why Retail Traders Struggle to Escape the High-Frequency Trading Loss Cycle Retail investors often fall into a trap of continuous losses in cryptocurrency markets due to high-frequency day trading, which is structurally skewed against them. The author, sharing from personal experience, explains that frequent trading without informational advantages—such as access to real order flow, liquidity maps, or market maker positions—inevitably leads to financial ruin over time. The key insight is that winning isn’t just about making profits but about preserving them. Most successful retail traders actually succeed by trading less: catching major market moves, then stepping back to avoid giving back gains. In contrast, constant trading—often driven by overconfidence and the false belief that discipline and risk management alone can beat the market—results in consistent losses. The article compares modern day trading to a "casino disguised as a café," where inexperienced traders, especially young ones, mistake gambling for a learnable skill. They rely on superficial tools like TradingView charts without understanding that institutional traders use advanced systems like Bloomberg terminals with exclusive data. Ultimately, the author advises retail traders to reduce trading frequency, avoid day trading, and focus on long-term strategies instead of chasing quick wins. The real tragedy is not losing money but believing that high-frequency trading is a sustainable strategy rather than a form of gambling.

比推16 хв тому

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

比推16 хв тому

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

"Circle (NYSE: CRCL), the issuer of USDC, has sparked intense debate in the crypto community following its Q3 2025 earnings report. Despite reporting strong growth—revenue up 66% YoY to $740 million and net income of $214 million, driven by a 108% increase in USDC circulation—its stock price fell significantly post-earnings and remains near its IPO price of $64. The core disagreement revolves around Circle’s business model and sustainability. Critics, including Jiang Zhuorer, argue that Circle operates like a bank, earning primarily through interest on reserve assets (mainly U.S. Treasuries), but is highly vulnerable to interest rate cuts. They highlight that ~60% of revenue is paid to distributors like Coinbase, leaving thin margins that could turn negative in a low-rate environment. They also warn of competition from traditional financial giants like JPMorgan and potential policy changes. Proponents, such as BTCdayu and qinbafrank, counter that Circle is building a long-term, network-driven infrastructure play. They compare it to Amazon or JD.com, arguing that current profit-sharing is a strategic cost to achieve scale, compliance advantage, and eventual market dominance in a winner-take-all industry. They believe USDC’s合规 (compliance) edge and institutional trust will drive adoption to multi-trillion dollars, outweighing interest rate risks. Short-term concerns include significant post-IPO lockup expirations adding selling pressure, and structural barriers like U.S. tax treatment of USDC as a property (not cash), hindering retail payment adoption. The debate encapsulates a clash between cyclical concerns (rates, costs, competition) and structural optimism (scale, compliance, network effects)."

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片