Is crypto security at risk? Google warns of 20x faster quantum threat

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-31Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-31

Анотація

Google's research indicates quantum computing advances could threaten cryptocurrency security by breaking widely used encryption standards. The report warns cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs) with approximately 1,200-1,450 logical qubits could potentially break 256-bit elliptic curve encryption in minutes. This capability might compromise Bitcoin private keys in under nine minutes and expose up to 1,000 Ethereum wallets in roughly nine days, with an estimated 6.7 million Bitcoin addresses currently vulnerable. Google emphasizes a 20-fold reduction in required physical qubits, accelerating the quantum threat timeline. In response, Google advocates transitioning to post-quantum cryptographic standards by 2029, though implementation requires coordinated upgrades and policy changes. Failure to adapt may lead to exploitation risks and market instability. Asian countries show the highest search interest in post-quantum cryptography solutions.

Security concerns around cryptocurrencies are intensifying after new research from Google warned that advances in quantum computing could undermine the cryptographic foundations securing billions in digital assets.

The report highlights how emerging quantum systems may soon be capable of breaking widely used encryption standards, raising fresh questions about the long-term resilience of blockchain networks such as Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Quantum threat puts crypto security at risk

The findings come at a critical time for the cryptocurrency industry, as institutional investors and governments increasingly embrace digital assets. Furthermore, a successful breach of cryptographic systems would leave wallets vulnerable to theft and undermine trust in blockchain infrastructure. As a result, this trust, which is based on the assumption of computational security, may be severely undermined.

Google’s research outlines a scenario where cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs) could decrypt both public and private keys. This would allow attackers to gain control of wallets and execute fraudulent transactions.

The report focuses on blockchains that use the industry standard 256-bit elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem (ECDLP-256). Furthermore, it estimates that a sufficiently advanced quantum system, with approximately 1,200 to 1,450 logical qubits and fewer than 500,000 physical qubits, could break this encryption in minutes. As a result, once such quantum capabilities are developed, the security of these blockchains could be jeopardized.

For context, such a system could compromise Bitcoin private keys in under nine minutes, faster than the network’s average block time. In Ethereum’s case, the same capability could enable attackers to access up to 1,000 wallets in roughly nine days. Google estimates that approximately 6.7 million Bitcoin addresses are currently among the most vulnerable.

“This represents an approximately 20-fold reduction in the number of physical qubits required to solve ECDLP-256,” the researchers noted, underscoring how quickly the technical barrier is shrinking.

Google urges a post-quantum shift by 2029

In response to these risks, Google has set a 2029 target for transitioning toward post-quantum cryptographic standards. The shift would involve replacing existing encryption schemes with quantum-resistant alternatives across blockchain networks.

However, the transition is expected to be complex and time-intensive. It will require coordinated upgrades, changes to wallet infrastructure, and new policies addressing dormant or vulnerable addresses. This is particularly applicable to those addresses linked to lost private keys.

“While viable solutions like post-quantum cryptography exist, they will take time to implement, increasing the urgency to act.”

Additional mitigation measures include discouraging address reuse and identifying exposed wallets before quantum systems reach critical capability.

Projects that fail to adapt could face both technical and market consequences. Beyond the risk of exploitation, delayed upgrades may trigger declining valuations and increased fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) among investors.

Data from Google Trends, at press time, indicates that Asian countries show the highest concern for “post-quantum cryptography,” with South Korea, China, and Singapore leading search interest.


Final Summary

  • Google warns that advances in quantum computing could impact cryptocurrencies.
  • The report suggests that digital assets may become vulnerable to hacks within minutes.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main security concern for cryptocurrencies according to Google's research?

AGoogle warns that advances in quantum computing could undermine the cryptographic foundations securing digital assets, potentially breaking widely used encryption standards.

QHow quickly could a quantum system compromise Bitcoin private keys based on the report?

AA sufficiently advanced quantum system could compromise Bitcoin private keys in under nine minutes, faster than the network's average block time.

QWhat is Google's target year for transitioning to post-quantum cryptographic standards?

AGoogle has set a 2029 target for transitioning toward post-quantum cryptographic standards to address quantum computing threats.

QWhich countries show the highest concern for 'post-quantum cryptography' according to Google Trends?

AAsian countries, particularly South Korea, China, and Singapore, show the highest search interest for 'post-quantum cryptography'.

QWhat are some mitigation measures mentioned to counter quantum threats?

AMitigation measures include discouraging address reuse, identifying exposed wallets, and transitioning to quantum-resistant encryption schemes.

Пов'язані матеріали

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit9 хв тому

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit9 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片