In the Internet Shutdown Winter, Iranians Rely on Decentralized Technology to Connect with the World

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-02-02Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-02

Анотація

Since early January, Iran has experienced severe nationwide internet blackouts amid violent protests triggered by the collapse of the national currency, the rial. Citizens like Darius, using pseudonyms for safety, have turned to decentralized tools such as dVPNs, OpenVPN, Shadowsocks, and V2Ray to bypass government censorship during brief connectivity windows. These tools disguise internet traffic to evade detection, allowing limited communication via platforms like Telegram. The Iranian government imposed the blackout to suppress protests and control information flow, following economic turmoil and public unrest. Experts note that decentralized networks and satellite systems like Starlink provide critical, resilient access, though complete shutdowns remain challenging to circumvent. The blackout has inflicted significant economic damage and hindered accurate reporting of casualties, with estimates of protest-related fatalities ranging from several thousand to tens of thousands. Despite these efforts, sustained resistance faces major obstacles without external support, as Iran’s heavily funded security apparatus maintains tight control. Decentralized technology remains a vital, though imperfect, lifeline for Iranians seeking to share information and connect with the outside world.

Written by: Liam Kelly

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

Since early January, Iran has been experiencing a large-scale internet shutdown, but some resourceful individuals have begun using decentralized technology to connect with the outside world.

During a brief window of internet connectivity amid the severe internet blockade in Iran this month, Darius managed to send a short message via Telegram.

"They are afraid of the videos protesters upload online, so they turned off all the street lights," he shared on January 14 with the Persian-language community Sentinel, of which he is a long-term member.

"People have to walk using their phone flashlights; everything is terrible. They have even broken North Korea's record in censorship."

This was about a week after the collapse of the Iranian rial (Iran's currency) sparked violent protests.

Since then, Darius has been switching between various network routing tools, including Sentinel's decentralized virtual private network (dVPN), to continue bypassing the government's strict communication blockade.

The tools he relies on include:

OpenVPN: A widely used tool that hides users' IP addresses;

Shadowsocks: Based on the SOCKS5 protocol, it disguises network traffic as random data;

V2Ray: Uses the security certificates of legitimate websites to conceal users' real identities.

In information exclusively provided to DL News, he described life under a violent regime with near-total internet disconnection.

"We are living in hell, with no internet, no money, no media, no support whatsoever," wrote Darius on January 14, using a pseudonym to protect his identity. "We need help; people cannot resist with bare hands—they shoot us with shotguns and AK-47s."

Digital Iron Curtain

In response to the ongoing protests that began last December and have spread to multiple areas beyond the capital Tehran, the Iranian government implemented the most severe communication shutdown in the regime's nearly 50-year history on January 8.

Adam Burns, co-founder of the Australian Internet Association, stated that the Iranian government's move has a dual purpose.

"This is a standard communication control measure, aimed at organizationally stifling protest activities and preventing international exposure," he told DL News. "Essentially, it's a form of risk management."

During this period, decentralized networks and traffic obfuscation tools became critical lifelines for the people.

Reports indicate that since last August, up to 90% of Iranians have used some form of circumvention tool to connect to the outside world.

Such networks are typically more resilient than centralized networks, which have a single database or point of failure. To destroy a decentralized network, the government must shut down every self-hosted node one by one or implement a complete nationwide internet blackout.

Other tools, such as Starlink, the distributed satellite network operated by Elon Musk's SpaceX, have also become vital communication channels for the people. Since systems like Starlink lack a single local node, their distributed infrastructure can provide critical network connectivity even under intense censorship.

However, reports note that such large-scale internet restrictions cost the country billions of dollars in economic losses.

"By providing decentralized, highly resilient network access to resist even the most aggressive censorship, we help keep information flowing, allowing the brave people inside Iran to document and share the violence concealed by the internet shutdown," Sentinel CEO Aleksandr Litreev told DL News.

Of course, in a complete internet blackout, almost no network can function.

However, during the shutdown, people like Darius can seize brief windows of connectivity, as the regime needs to balance silencing criticism with maintaining economic operations.

"It's a cyclical cat-and-mouse game," Burns said.

Using his combination of tools, Darius disguises his network requests as ordinary traffic, directing them to large Iranian e-commerce websites that the government keeps online for economic purposes. This encrypted data is then tunneled to overseas servers that can access the external internet.

This is not foolproof, nor is it sustainable, but it allows Darius to send a few Telegram messages during brief connectivity windows.

"Once the traffic pattern is exposed as an unauthenticated connection, it is immediately cut off," Darius wrote on January 23.

Chaos in Iran

Over the past four weeks, Iran has descended into total chaos.

On December 28, people gathered in Tehran's Grand Bazaar to protest the government's handling of the currency collapse. By the end of 2025, the Iranian rial had hit a historic low, with 1 US dollar exchanging for 1.4 million rials, partly due to severe international sanctions and financial mismanagement by Iran's leadership. The US imposed sanctions on Iran to prevent its nuclear weapons program and stop its support for terrorist groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis.

"It's like holding a shitcoin listed only on isolated exchanges, its price falling every day, until you have to use this worthless currency to buy basic necessities like milk and meat," Darius wrote. "Worse, the next day, the same items cost even more."

Iran is a theocracy, with the vast majority of power held by the Supreme Leader, cleric Ali Khamenei. Although Iran has an elected president and parliament, their power is limited. The people have long criticized the regime, and the rial's collapse has completely changed the situation.

"Generally, people don't revolt for lofty ideals like democracy or universal suffrage; they rebel over things that affect their daily lives," Tallha Abdulrazaq, a researcher at the University of Exeter's Institute for Strategy and Security, told DL News. "As long as basic needs are met and there is hope for the future, people are more willing to live under authoritarian rule."

After the internet shutdown on January 8, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Basij militia began clearing protestors with live ammunition.

Due to the internet blackout, it has been difficult for people on the ground and multiple human rights organizations to verify the death toll. The Iran Human Rights Organization reported at least 3,428 deaths; London-based Persian-language news channel Iran International, citing internal documents from the Supreme National Security Council and the Presidential Office, reported at least 12,000 deaths. Two senior officials from Iran's Health Ministry told Time magazine that as many as 30,000 may have been killed between January 8 and 9.

As for overthrowing the regime, Abdulrazaq believes it is almost impossible without international intervention. "The Iranian government may not have invested in public services, but it has invested heavily in security agencies. Therefore, without external support, I don't see how these protests can overthrow the Iranian regime," he said.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat decentralized technologies are Iranians using to connect to the outside world during the internet blackout?

AIranians are using decentralized technologies such as Sentinel's dVPN, OpenVPN to hide IP addresses, Shadowsocks to disguise network traffic as random data, and V2Ray to mask user identities using legitimate website security certificates.

QWhy did the Iranian government impose such a severe internet blackout in January?

AThe Iranian government imposed the internet blackout to prevent the organization of protests and to stop international exposure of the violent crackdowns on demonstrators, following protests triggered by the collapse of the Iranian rial and economic mismanagement.

QHow do decentralized networks provide resilience against government censorship compared to centralized networks?

ADecentralized networks are more resilient because they lack a single point of failure or central database. To shut them down, the government would need to disable each self-hosted node individually or implement a complete nationwide internet blackout.

QWhat economic and social conditions led to the protests in Iran?

AThe protests were sparked by the collapse of the Iranian rial, which hit a record low of 1.4 million rials to the US dollar due to international sanctions and financial mismanagement. This led to severe inflation, making basic goods unaffordable and exacerbating public dissatisfaction with the regime.

QWhat are the reported casualty figures during the internet blackout and crackdown, and why is there difficulty in verifying them?

AReports vary widely: the Iran Human Rights Organization reported at least 3,428 deaths, Iran International cited internal documents suggesting at least 12,000 deaths, and Iranian Health Ministry officials told Time that up to 30,000 may have been killed. Verification is difficult due to the internet blackout, which prevents information from being shared and documented effectively.

Пов'язані матеріали

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

As AI-generated web traffic now surpasses human activity, the internet's foundational business models—built on human attention, browsing, and advertising—face severe disruption. AI agents crawl websites at immense scale without generating ad revenue, while AI summaries divert traffic from original content sites. In response, over 2.5 million sites are blocking AI crawlers, and protections like Cloudflare's "honeypot" traps have emerged, though advanced AI can bypass these. The collapse of traditional CAPTCHAs, which assumed machines were weaker than humans, has led to a shift toward behavioral biometrics for human verification. Companies like IBM and BioCatch now analyze unique human patterns—cursor movements, typing rhythms, keystroke dynamics, and even cognitive delays like the Stroop effect—to distinguish real users from bots. These biometric signatures are difficult to fake or alter, offering a new layer of security but raising significant privacy concerns. Two competing visions for a reliable human verification system are emerging. One, exemplified by Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin), uses centralized iris scanning to generate unique credentials, though it faces bans and criticism over unauthorized data collection. The other employs cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs, allowing users to prove they are human without revealing identity or biometric data, as advocated by Vitalik Buterin. However, decentralized approaches risk exploitation through identity renting in economically unequal regions. The central dilemma is between a scalable but privacy-invasive centralized system that permanently controls users' biometric data, and a privacy-preserving cryptographic system vulnerable to real-world economic manipulation. The author expresses a preference for the cryptographic path, arguing that despite its flaws, it avoids the irreversible biometric surveillance inherent in centralized alternatives.

Foresight News8 хв тому

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

Foresight News8 хв тому

Crypto Primary Market Investment and Financing Forward-Looking Weekly Report | Stablecoin Regulation Nears Implementation, ETF Funds Continue to Withdraw, Capital Begins Betting on Payment and Cash Flow

Crypto Market Weekly Report (Jun 1-7, 2026): Capital Shifts Focus to Payments & Cash Flow Market data indicates a significant divergence: while traditional institutional funds continue exiting via BTC and ETH ETFs (recording net outflows of $1.72B and $168M this week, respectively), stablecoin supply continues growing. This suggests capital is shifting from speculative asset allocation toward defensive positioning within on-chain liquidity, awaiting new, concrete opportunities. This trend is reflected in venture capital focus. Weekly fundraising fell 27% to $302M, with investments concentrating on infrastructure with tangible revenue potential: 1. **Stablecoin Infrastructure (28% of funding):** Projects like M0 Protocol ($35M raise) are gaining attention as regulatory clarity (e.g., the GENIUS Act) nears, shifting the focus from legitimacy to building payment and settlement networks. 2. **AI Agent Infrastructure (26%):** Investments are moving from conceptual AI Agents towards the execution and economic layers required for a functional "Agent economy." Key raises include OpenRouter ($40M) and Halliday ($20M). 3. **Real World Assets (RWA) (18%):** The search for on-chain yield and cash flow drives continued interest in RWA platforms like Ondo Finance. Security threats are evolving from smart contract exploits toward key management failures, permission control issues, and regulatory execution risks (e.g., court-ordered asset freezes). **Key Takeaways:** The investment thesis is shifting from narrative-driven bets to revenue and cash-flow-generating protocols. Future attention should be on the progression of stablecoin regulations, the commercial validation of AI Agent economies, and the performance of high-revenue protocols like derivatives platforms.

marsbit15 хв тому

Crypto Primary Market Investment and Financing Forward-Looking Weekly Report | Stablecoin Regulation Nears Implementation, ETF Funds Continue to Withdraw, Capital Begins Betting on Payment and Cash Flow

marsbit15 хв тому

Buy an NFT First to Get a Ticket? The Largest World Cup Ticket Slump in History

"Ticketing Woes for 2026 World Cup: NFT 'Right-to-Buy' and High Prices Dampen Sales" Despite anticipation for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, with 48 teams and 104 matches across North America, the tournament faces significant unsold tickets, with approximately 180,000 group-stage tickets still available for resale just before kick-off. This unexpected shortfall is attributed to FIFA's controversial new ticketing strategy, which includes an NFT-based "Right-to-Buy" (RTB) system and opaque, dynamic pricing. FIFA introduced RTBs as digital collectibles (NFTs) sold on its FIFA Collect platform. An RTB grants the holder only the right to purchase a ticket for a specific match later, not the ticket itself. This two-step process, criticized for selling "scarcity" first, saw RTBs priced from tens to hundreds of dollars, generating millions in revenue for FIFA. With many tickets remaining available on official channels, the value of these prepaid purchase rights is now being questioned. Compounding the issue are ticket prices, reported to be 2 to 4 times higher than the 2022 Qatar World Cup, and up to 7 times more for marquee matches. FIFA employed dynamic pricing, common in U.S. sports, but lacked transparency on seat availability and exact locations during sales, frustrating global fans facing high travel costs. This has drawn scrutiny from regulators in New York and New Jersey. FIFA's official resale platform also drew criticism for imposing high fees—roughly 10% on sellers and 17% on buyers, allowing FIFA to profit further from secondary market transactions. While FIFA President Gianni Infantino states over 6 million tickets have been sold, the situation highlights a potential disconnect between fan enthusiasm and willingness to pay under an aggressive commercial model.

marsbit22 хв тому

Buy an NFT First to Get a Ticket? The Largest World Cup Ticket Slump in History

marsbit22 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片