Hyperliquid Launches D.C. Policy Center Backed By $28 Million In HYPE Tokens

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-02-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-19

Анотація

Hyperliquid has announced the creation of the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), a new Washington, D.C.-based organization backed by a $28.7 million allocation of HYPE tokens. The center will be led by Jake Chervinsky, former executive of the Blockchain Association and Variant, and aims to advocate for clearer federal regulations for decentralized finance (DeFi). HPC will focus on educating lawmakers and regulators about DeFi protocols and pushing for a legal framework for perpetual derivatives, which are popular in crypto but face regulatory uncertainty in the U.S. The initiative also includes key hires from legal and policy backgrounds to support its mission.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) announced on Wednesday that its Foundation will back the creation of the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), a new Washington, D.C.-based organization designed to advocate for clearer federal rules governing decentralized finance (DeFi).

Jake Chervinsky To Lead Hyperliquid Policy Center

The new center will be led by Jake Chervinsky, who previously held senior roles at the Blockchain Association, one of the industry’s leading trade groups, and at venture capital firm Variant.

As HPC’s inaugural CEO, he is expected to lead efforts to engage lawmakers and regulators at a time when digital asset policy is shifting away from previous roadblocks that hampered the sector’s growth in the United States.

In comments to Fortune, Chervinsky said the United States is at a pivotal juncture in determining how decentralized finance should be integrated into the country’s financial framework.

The center’s mission will be to help members of Congress and federal agencies better understand how DeFi protocols function and to offer technical expertise as regulators craft rules that can accommodate the technology, the executive asserted.

He emphasized that much of today’s financial regulatory system was designed for an earlier, analog era. In his view, those frameworks are poorly suited to decentralized protocols, which enable users to trade digital assets on automated platforms that operate without centralized intermediaries.

HPC Backs Perpetuals Framework

Among the center’s top priorities will be establishing a legal structure for perpetual derivatives, commonly known as “perps.” These instruments, which do not have expiration dates, are widely traded on offshore crypto exchanges and account for a significant share of global digital asset activity.

Chervinsky contends that perpetuals offer advantages over traditional options and futures contracts because they are simpler and provide more direct exposure to underlying assets. Despite their popularity abroad, they have yet to gain a foothold in mainstream US finance, in part due to regulatory uncertainty.

To fund the initiative, the foundation affiliated with Hyperliquid is contributing 1 million HYPE tokens. At current prices of $28.75 per token, that allocation is valued at approximately $28.7 million.

The 1D chart shows HYPE testing the $28 support on Wednesday. Source: HYPEUSDT on TradingView.com

In addition to Jake Chervinsky’s role in the new venture, the founding team includes Policy Counsel Brad Bourque, formerly an associate at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, and Policy Director Salah Ghazzal, who previously served as Policy Lead at Variant.

The Hyperliquid Policy Center is also building out its leadership bench and is currently recruiting for key roles, including Chief of Staff, Head of Communications, and Head of Government Relations.

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) and what is its primary mission?

AThe Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) is a new Washington, D.C.-based organization backed by the Hyperliquid Foundation. Its primary mission is to advocate for clearer federal rules governing decentralized finance (DeFi) by helping members of Congress and federal agencies better understand how DeFi protocols function and offering technical expertise to regulators.

QWho is leading the Hyperliquid Policy Center and what is his background?

AJake Chervinsky is leading the Hyperliquid Policy Center as its inaugural CEO. He previously held senior roles at the Blockchain Association, a leading industry trade group, and at the venture capital firm Variant.

QWhat is one of the top regulatory priorities for the HPC, and why is it important?

AOne of the top priorities for the HPC is establishing a legal structure for perpetual derivatives ('perps'). These instruments are widely traded on offshore crypto exchanges and represent a significant share of global digital asset activity, but they have yet to gain a foothold in mainstream US finance due to regulatory uncertainty.

QHow is the Hyperliquid Foundation funding the new policy center, and what is the value of the contribution?

AThe Hyperliquid Foundation is funding the initiative by contributing 1 million HYPE tokens. At the current price of $28.75 per token, this allocation is valued at approximately $28.7 million.

QBesides Jake Chervinsky, who else is on the founding team of the Hyperliquid Policy Center?

AThe founding team also includes Policy Counsel Brad Bourque, formerly an associate at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, and Policy Director Salah Ghazzal, who previously served as Policy Lead at Variant.

Пов'язані матеріали

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手5 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手5 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit7 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit7 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手8 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手8 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit9 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit9 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片