Hyperliquid (HYPE) Drops 25% in February, Key Support Tested

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-16Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-16

Анотація

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has experienced a significant decline, dropping over 25% in February 2026. Currently trading at $29.77, it is down 5.51% in the past 24 hours. The token being 50.07% below its all-time high of $59.39 from September of the previous year. Its market capitalization stands at $7.76 billion. The token is testing a critical support level, and a further 10% decline is possible if bearish pressure continues. Technical indicators show key resistance levels at $34.21, $37.59, and $43.09, with support levels at $23.28, $19.92, and $14.44. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is neutral at 50.19. The current downturn is attributed to a lack of bullish participation rather than aggressive selling, suggesting a corrective move rather than a full trend reversal. A rebound is possible if the support holds and trading volume increases.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has been captivating strong market attention for the past few days; however, the price action tells another story. Instead of increased interest, HYPE continuously trades on a negative side, slipping over 25% since the beginning of February 2026.

At the time of writing, the token is exchanging hands at $29.77, down by 5.51% in the past 24 hours. The seven-day move remained down by 5.92% and up around 17.97% in one month’s tenure. The token also showed an upward trajectory as compared to the last year and is up around 13.11%.

The 24-hour price performance shows a low of $29.59 and a high sitting at $31.64. The token remains 50.07% down from the all-time high of $59.39 hit in September last year and 826.7% up from the all-time low of $3.20 hit in November 2024. With this, the overall market capitalisation of the token stands at $7.76 billion.

The token seems prone to another 10% in the near future as it sits near a critical support zone. If sellers continue their control, the continuing downtrend may surge. Although, the bearish pressure could immediately fade if bulls come in with conviction.

The Technical Indicator

The technical indicator shows the first resistance at $34.21, followed by second and third resistances at $37.59 and $43.09, respectively. On the other hand, the first support level sits at $23.28, with second and third support levels at $19.92 and $14.44, respectively.

The relative strength index indicates a neutral level, being at the 50.19 mark. The 20-50-100 day exponential moving averages remain at 30.37, 29.24 and 30.71. It is noteworthy that the current fall is mostly influenced by waning bullish participation instead of aggressive selling. This also suggests that the recent move is corrective regardless of a full trend reversal.

If HYPE remains at the support zone and volume restores, a rebound is possible, possibly setting the stage for one more attempt for the resistance range.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Momentum Ignites: Can MUBARAK Extend Its 11% Breakout Into a Stronger Bullish Phase?

TagsHYPEHyperliquidHyperliquid (HYPE)

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the current price of Hyperliquid (HYPE) and how much has it fallen in February 2026?

AThe current price of Hyperliquid (HYPE) is $29.77, and it has fallen over 25% since the beginning of February 2026.

QWhat are the first resistance and first support levels for HYPE according to the technical indicators?

AThe first resistance level is at $34.21, and the first support level is at $23.28.

QHow does the current HYPE price compare to its all-time high and all-time low?

AThe current price is 50.07% down from its all-time high of $59.39 and 826.7% up from its all-time low of $3.20.

QWhat does the Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicate about the HYPE market?

AThe Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicates a neutral level, being at the 50.19 mark.

QWhat is the market capitalization of the Hyperliquid (HYPE) token?

AThe market capitalization of the Hyperliquid (HYPE) token is $7.76 billion.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit11 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit11 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit20 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit20 хв тому

Bank of America Quietly Positions: Could $6 Trillion in Bank Deposits Flow into Stablecoins?

Bank of America (BofA) is making strategic moves in digital assets, appointing senior leaders to advance a platform covering stablecoins, tokenized deposits, custody, and crypto settlement. This comes amid a broader discussion about the potential migration of trillions in bank deposits to stablecoins. A cited TBAC report estimated up to $6.6 trillion in transactional deposits could be at risk of moving to stablecoins long-term, a point BofA's CEO previously conditioned on stablecoins being allowed to pay interest. The regulatory landscape is evolving, with the GENIUS Act setting a final implementation deadline for January 2027. Major banks, however, are not waiting; JPMorgan, Citi, BofA, and others are already developing tokenized deposit networks and services. Industry observers note that while retail crypto trading is sluggish, institutional adoption of stablecoins for real-world use cases is driving growth. Despite the activity, some analysts remain cautious, noting banks have a long history of blockchain announcements and that true structural change is slow. The stablecoin market itself has seen a recent dip from its peak. Optimistic projections, however, foresee significant growth, with stablecoin settlement volume already reaching $33 trillion in 2025. The race is on for the post-January 2027 landscape, where regulatory clarity is expected to accelerate the fusion of traditional finance and crypto.

marsbit25 хв тому

Bank of America Quietly Positions: Could $6 Trillion in Bank Deposits Flow into Stablecoins?

marsbit25 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片