Hunter Becomes the Hunted: The Most Profitable MEV Bot Gets Hacked

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2026-06-21Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-21

Анотація

The prominent Ethereum MEV bot address Jaredfromsubway.eth suffered a targeted on-chain attack, losing over $7.5 million. The incident was identified as a "counter-MEV honeypot attack," where the attacker deployed numerous fake token contracts and liquidity pools over several weeks, mimicking mainstream assets like WETH and USDC to create seemingly profitable arbitrage opportunities. The MEV bot, designed to automatically detect and execute such trades, interacted with the malicious setup. During the process, it granted approvals to attacker-controlled contracts, which were not promptly revoked. The attacker later exploited these persistent permissions in a single transaction, draining the bot's holdings of ETH, USDC, and USDT. Jaredfromsubway.eth is known as one of Ethereum's most active and profitable MEV bots, primarily executing "sandwich attacks" to extract value from user transactions. Its operations have been linked to a majority of such attacks on the network. This event highlights the evolving security threats in crypto, demonstrating that even sophisticated, rule-exploiting systems can become targets of carefully designed behavioral traps. Following the theft, an impersonator account on X falsely claimed to offer a bounty for the return of the funds, prompting warnings from developers.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

The well-known MEV Bot address Jaredfromsubway.eth, long active on the Ethereum network, was targeted in a highly sophisticated on-chain attack on Saturday, resulting in losses exceeding $7.5 million.

According to investigations by Blockaid and several on-chain analytics firms, this incident was not a traditional phishing attack or smart contract exploit. Instead, it was a "counter-MEV honeypot attack" specifically designed to target the operational logic of MEV Bots.

Over the preceding weeks, the attacker had systematically deployed 66 counterfeit token contracts and fake liquidity pools. These assets were meticulously disguised on-chain as mainstream stablecoins like WETH, USDC, and USDT, creating seemingly legitimate arbitrage trading pathways.

The attack chain unfolded step by step — the fake liquidity pools generated signals for "arbitrageable price gaps"; the MEV bot automatically identified the arbitrage opportunity and executed trades; during the transaction, the robot granted authorization to an auxiliary contract controlled by the attacker; this authorization was not promptly revoked, leading to persistent exposure of permissions; Ultimately, in a single transaction, the attacker triggered a pre-embedded backdoor logic, directly draining the ETH, USDC, and USDT held in the MEV bot's address.

On-chain data shows that the total value of assets stolen from Jaredfromsubway.eth in this attack has exceeded $7.5 million. The attacker subsequently split and transferred portions of the funds, further dispersing the flow through mixing tools.

Who is Jaredfromsubway.eth? The Most Notorious MEV Bot Address

The reason this attack is so notable today is that the victim, Jaredfromsubway.eth, is itself one of the most active, profitable, and notorious MEV Bots on the Ethereum network (if not the most).

Essentially, "MEV attacks" are a category of on-chain arbitrage behaviors revolving around "transaction ordering rights." On the Ethereum network, transactions enter the mempool to await block inclusion before being confirmed. Block builders or searchers can extract extra profit by adjusting transaction order, inserting transactions, or rearranging transactions within a block.

The most typical attack type is the "Sandwich Attack" — the attacker inserts buy and sell operations immediately before and after a user's transaction, profiting from the price slippage within a very short time frame. Such behavior is extremely common in high-liquidity DeFi trading pairs and constitutes one of the most fundamental profit models within the MEV ecosystem.

Jaredfromsubway.eth is precisely the most representative automated executor of this mechanism. Unlike traditional "single-point arbitrage bots," this MEV Bot resembles a highly industrialized MEV execution system. It continuously monitors unconfirmed transactions in the mempool, identifies in real-time transaction paths susceptible to being sandwiched, and completes transaction construction, Gas bidding, and order insertion within an extremely short time window, systematically capturing slippage profits.

Data from Cointelegraph Research shows that from November 2024 to October 2025, approximately 60,000 to 90,000 sandwich attacks occurred monthly on the Ethereum network, with about 70% related to the strategic system of Jaredfromsubway.eth.

In May of this year, when Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin exchanged 26,544 DigitalBits (XDB), his transaction was also targeted and sandwiched by Jaredfromsubway.eth.

Regarding Jaredfromsubway.eth's historical revenue, there is no official statistic, but conservative estimates suggest that the address has accumulated MEV profits reaching tens of millions of dollars during its active periods. During some peak periods, its daily earnings could reach hundreds of thousands of dollars, and it consistently ranked near the top of Ethereum's MEV leaderboards.

Crypto Security Threats Intensify: Even Top Predators Are Not Spared

While one might muse that "the eagle-hunter finally got pecked," the hacking of Jaredfromsubway.eth has also sounded another alarm regarding risks in the cryptocurrency space.

In past perceptions, MEV Bots like Jaredfromsubway.eth belonged to the "predator" side of the on-chain ecosystem — they continuously capture slippage and arbitrage opportunities within user transactions through automated strategies, positioning themselves advantageously, arguably representing one of the most iconic types of attackers in the cryptocurrency market.

But this time, it became the one that was designed, lured, and ultimately harvested. Moreover, the attacker did not choose a traditional exploit path. Instead, they constructed a long-running "behavioral trap," allowing the MEV Bot's automated system to make progressively flawed decisions while fully complying with its own rules.

It must be acknowledged that even participants like Jaredfromsubway.eth, once most adept at "gaming the system," are now exposed to a broader attack surface.

Additionally, it is worth noting that after Jaredfromsubway.eth was hacked, an unknown X account with 94,000 followers changed its name to Jaredfromsubway.eth and falsely claimed it would "offer a $1 million bounty for the full return of all funds."

Several developers issued risk warnings, emphasizing that this account is not the official Jaredfromsubway.eth account (the MEV Bot team has no official account). They cautioned that this account might be used for scams subsequently and urged users to remain highly vigilant.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat type of attack did the MEV bot Jaredfromsubway.eth fall victim to, according to the article?

AThe article states that the MEV bot Jaredfromsubway.eth was targeted by a 'counter-MEV honeypot attack.' This was not a traditional phishing or smart contract exploit, but a sophisticated attack specifically designed to exploit the MEV bot's behavioral logic.

QWhat was the estimated total loss suffered by Jaredfromsubway.eth in this incident?

AAccording to on-chain data cited in the article, the total value of assets stolen from Jaredfromsubway.eth exceeded 7.5 million US dollars.

QAccording to the article, what is a 'Sandwich Attack' in the context of MEV?

AA 'Sandwich Attack' is described as a typical type of MEV attack. In this strategy, the attacker inserts buy and sell orders before and after a target user's transaction, respectively, to profit from the price slippage within a very short time window.

QWhat significant event involving Vitalik Buterin is mentioned in relation to Jaredfromsubway.eth?

AThe article mentions that in May of this year (presumably 2025), Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin was targeted by Jaredfromsubway.eth when exchanging 26,544 DigitalBits (XDB) tokens.

QFollowing the hack, what fake action was taken by an unknown X account, and what warning was given?

AAn unknown X account with 94,000 followers changed its name to Jaredfromsubway.eth and falsely announced a '1 million US dollar bounty for the full return of all funds.' Developers issued warnings that this is not the official account (as the MEV bot team has none) and cautioned users to remain vigilant as the account might be used for scams.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Jacobian Conjecture that plagued Yitang Zhang for 7 years was overturned and disproven by Fable 5 overnight

**Summary:** The mathematical community was shocked when the longstanding **Jacobi Conjecture**—a core problem in polynomial mapping that had remained open for 87 years—was reportedly **disproven** by **Fable 5** (an AI model from Anthropic). The conjecture, first posed in 1939, asks whether a polynomial map with a constant, non-zero Jacobian determinant must have a polynomial inverse. Despite seeming intuitive, it had resisted numerous proof attempts by leading mathematicians. The breakthrough came when a researcher, Levent Alpoge, shared a succinct counterexample generated by Fable 5: a specific polynomial map from ℂ³ to ℂ³ whose Jacobian is the constant -2, yet which is not injective (mapping three distinct points to the same image). This elegantly falsifies the conjecture in its general form for dimensions ≥3. The counterexample is simple enough to be verified by hand or with tools like Wolfram Alpha. The event sparked intense discussion, with other AI models like GPT-5.6 quickly analyzing the result and even proposing a refined conjecture. It demonstrated AI's emerging capacity for genuine mathematical creativity, not just pattern matching. The story carries a poignant human dimension: renowned mathematician **Yitang Zhang** had devoted seven years of his early career to this problem under his PhD advisor, using a flawed lemma provided by the advisor. This setback contributed to Zhang leaving academia for years, including a period working at Subway, before his later breakthrough on the Twin Prime Conjecture. The AI's swift resolution underscores the tragic waste of his early effort on a conjecture now shown to be false in higher dimensions. It's important to note the disproof specifically targets the generalized (n-dimensional, n≥3) conjecture. The 2-dimensional case, which Zhang worked on, remains open and is considered mathematically distinct and even more challenging. Nonetheless, the event marks a significant moment, prompting reflections on AI's future role in mathematical discovery.

marsbit27 хв тому

The Jacobian Conjecture that plagued Yitang Zhang for 7 years was overturned and disproven by Fable 5 overnight

marsbit27 хв тому

Bought Bitcoin at $117,000, Sold at $62,000 in Tears: This Company’s Faith Only Lasted a Year

Wall Street's once-hot trend of corporate "Bitcoin hoarding" has hit a painful reality check. Empery Digital, formerly an electric motorcycle company, pivoted to Bitcoin in July 2025, accumulating over 4,000 BTC at an average cost of approximately $117,600 each. As Bitcoin's price plummeted, the company faced massive paper losses exceeding its total market value by early 2026, triggering internal conflict with a major shareholder demanding a sale. In a stark reversal from its earlier refusal to sell, Empery Digital recently sold 1,400 BTC at an average price of $62,000, locking in a significant loss of roughly $77 million on just those coins. The proceeds were used to pay down $10 million in debt, prepare for legal fees related to shareholder lawsuits, and, most notably, fund a new strategic shift: a $65 million investment for a 25% stake in an AI data center facility. This move completes a cycle of chasing market trends—from electric vehicles to Bitcoin treasury and now to AI infrastructure. Empery's case exposes the leveraged nature of the corporate "treasury model," where buying Bitcoin with borrowed money works only while prices rise. Once the asset fell below its cost basis, the company was forced to sell at a loss to service debt and pivot to the next opportunity. The company's remaining assets are 1,514 BTC and its ambitions in AI, demonstrating that its stated "long-term belief" in Bitcoin had a clear price tag: a 50% discount.

marsbit37 хв тому

Bought Bitcoin at $117,000, Sold at $62,000 in Tears: This Company’s Faith Only Lasted a Year

marsbit37 хв тому

Visa Joins the Stablecoin Arena: Not to Eliminate Stablecoins, but to 'Collect Rent' from Them

Visa is entering the stablecoin arena by launching a stablecoin platform, aiming not to eliminate existing stablecoins but to facilitate and profit from their broader adoption. The platform will enable banks, financial institutions, and fintech companies to more easily issue, manage, and integrate stablecoins into Visa's existing global payment network, which spans over 200 million merchants and 15,000 financial institutions. This move is expected to expand the overall stablecoin market by creating more use cases. For USDC (Circle), it presents a short-term benefit due to likely direct integration and its compliance advantages, though long-term competition may increase from bank-issued or consortium stablecoins. For USDT (Tether), the impact could be more significant in traditional payment and settlement areas, as Visa's platform may favor more transparent, compliant options, though USDT is expected to remain strong in pure crypto trading contexts. Regarding Ethereum, Visa's initiative is seen as neutral to slightly positive. It could drive more traditional capital into the Ethereum ecosystem in the form of stablecoins, increasing network activity and demand for Ethereum as a settlement layer, especially with Layer-2 scaling solutions. While the platform will support multiple blockchains, Ethereum's maturity and decentralization make it a likely primary choice for compliant stablecoins. In essence, Visa's strategy is to embrace stablecoins, collect fees from increased transaction volume on its network, and grow the overall market, rather than displace major incumbents like USDC and USDT directly.

marsbit1 год тому

Visa Joins the Stablecoin Arena: Not to Eliminate Stablecoins, but to 'Collect Rent' from Them

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片