How Does Backpack's Staking Token for Equity Conversion Work?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2026-02-25Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-25

Анотація

Backpack, a Solana-based wallet and exchange platform founded by ex-FTX members, has announced a novel staking-to-equity conversion plan. Users who stake its native token for at least one year can convert those tokens into real company equity at a fixed ratio, with 20% of equity reserved for this program. This move aims to transition users from token holders to legal company owners. The platform emerged post-FTX collapse, initially focusing on wallet and NFT services (like the Mad Lads NFT collection) before launching its exchange. It has over $4000B in cumulative trading volume and $350M in user assets. Backpack’s tokenomics include a 1B total supply, with 62.5% pre-IPO allocation. The TGE releases 250M tokens (25% of total), entirely distributed to users. The model ties token release to milestones and future IPO, blending crypto incentives with traditional equity. However, the plan faces regulatory challenges, particularly from the SEC, which may classify the token as a security. Dual ownership via tokens and equity could complicate IPO efforts and investor relations. Despite risks, Backpack’s approach attempts to innovate beyond typical “token-as-reward” models by linking crypto community growth to real equity value and long-term ownership.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Ding Dang (@XiaMiPP)

On February 24, Backpack CEO Armani Ferrante announced a staking-for-equity conversion plan, where users who stake the platform's native token for at least one year will have the opportunity to convert these tokens into real company equity at a fixed ratio. The company has reserved 20% of its equity for this plan.

From this short statement, the amount of information released far exceeds that of a conventional TGE narrative.

Because, in the traditional TGE narrative, users are seen as traffic and community token holders; but in this design, Backpack attempts to upgrade users from product users to legal company owners.

The question is: Can it really work? Is this a financial innovation, or a high-risk experiment dancing on the edge of regulation? Does it change the power structure, or is it just a more advanced chip management technique? To understand this, we must return to Backpack's own historical trajectory.

Backpack: A Company Rising from the Ruins

Backpack is a "wallet + exchange" integrated platform centered on the Solana ecosystem, founded by former FTX and Alameda Research member Armani Ferrante. It was established after the collapse of FTX, emphasizing compliance and user custody.

However, unlike the development path of "first trading, then ecosystem" followed by centralized exchanges like Binance, Backpack's path is the reverse. It started with a wallet and NFTs, gradually accumulating users, community, and technical foundation, and finally launched an exchange.

Looking back at Backpack's history. In 2022, the collapse of FTX not only tore apart the credit structure of the entire crypto industry but also directly hit projects associated with it. Backpack had just completed a $20 million funding round led by FTX Ventures and Jump Crypto before FTX's collapse. But as the empire fell, approximately 80% of Backpack's operating capital evaporated. At that time, Backpack was positioned as a "wallet + xNFT operating system," aiming to provide Solana users with a safer, integrated entry point, avoiding reliance on centralized platforms.

In April 2023, during the bear market trough, Backpack quietly launched the Mad Lads NFT series, with a minting cost of 6.9 SOL. It quickly became one of the top NFT communities on Solana that year, with the highest floor price reaching 229.4 SOL. Today, when the NFT trend has largely passed, the Mad Lads floor price remains at 18.8 SOL, more than double the original minting price.

In November of the same year, Backpack obtained a Dubai VARA license and launched Backpack Exchange, but it was only in a testing phase at the time. By then, it had already accumulated user trust through its wallet and NFT, and then monetized the traffic through the exchange. In February 2024, Backpack completed a $17 million Series A funding round, with a valuation of $120 million. In January 2025, it acquired FTX Europe's assets for $32.7 million, obtaining a European MiFID II license, further strengthening its compliance foundation, and committing to handle FTX EU customer claims.

Backpack was born with a silver spoon but also rebuilt from the ruins. After nearly three years, Backpack's cumulative trading volume has exceeded $400 billion, with user assets exceeding $350 million.

Now, it is about to make a bigger leap.

Token Issuance Plan and Equity Linkage

On February 17, Backpack announced the start of identity verification before TGE, the first step for users to claim tokens.

In the token economic model announced by Backpack, the total token supply is 1 billion. The pre-IPO total supply is 625 million tokens (62.5%), released in three phases:

  • Phase 1 (TGE): Releases 25% of the total supply, i.e., 250 million tokens. Among them, 240 million (24%) are allocated to points holders, and 10 million (1%) are allocated to Mad Lads holders. This phase is 100% allocated to users, with no internal team share.
  • Phase 2 (Pre-IPO): Accounts for 37.5%, i.e., 375 million tokens, as "growth-triggered unlocks," released gradually based on key milestones (such as regulatory approval, new product launches, and geographic expansion).
  • Phase 3 (Post-IPO): Also accounts for 37.5%, i.e., 375 million tokens, deposited into company treasury, locked for one year after IPO, for the team and investors.

From its token distribution plan, we can already see that token issuance is closely tied to the IPO. Backpack is currently negotiating terms for a new $50 million funding round with a valuation of $1 billion. If calculated based on this valuation, the 20% equity is worth $200 million.

In the short history of the cryptocurrency industry, token issuance has quietly evolved from an optional financing tool to an almost "instinctive choice" and default path for almost all projects. As users, we are familiar with this method, but this goes beyond what we are familiar with.

From the perspective of the entire industry, this play fills a gap. Coinbase successfully IPOed in 2021 but never issued a native token; DeFi projects like Uniswap issued governance tokens but did not take the equity listing route. Backpack is trying a "dual-track system," where tokens are used for community incentives and equity for long-term ownership, but there is no precedent for this in the crypto industry.

Is Token Issuance + IPO Feasible?

Although this plan is bold and innovative, it faces regulatory challenges.

In the context of U.S. regulation, most tokens could be considered securities by the SEC. Once that happens, companies must comply with registration, disclosure, and anti-fraud rules. If an IPO is pursued in the future, the SEC will review the history of token issuance, structural design, and potential violation records.

More complex is that the coexistence of equity and tokens may trigger "ownership conflicts": IPO investors worry about dilution of rights (such as voting rights, dividends), while token holders expect value capture, which could be seen as "dual financing" or misleading behavior. Especially during the Gensler era from 2022 to 2024, enforcement tightened, and many projects directly abandoned IPOs.

In short, token issuance takes the fast lane of "decentralized/on-chain financing," while IPO takes the slow lane of "centralized compliance/equity financing." Backpack is trying to drive two cars at the same time, which requires extremely strong structural design and regulatory communication capabilities; otherwise, it may face listing delays or regulatory fines.

Although there is no complete precedent in the crypto industry, there are precedents. Coinbase, also a centralized exchange, completed its IPO in 2021, but they had actually considered issuing a token. Backpack co-founder Can Sun revealed in a podcast two years ago that he participated in Coinbase's listing work and helped design their token economic model. Although Coinbase ultimately chose a pure equity listing, this experience provided valuable reference for Backpack. And at that time, he had already planned to realize this unfulfilled wish at Backpack.

Can It Change the Industry?

Today, the现状 of the crypto industry is that a large number of tokens shrink by more than 80% in price one year after listing. "Listing is the peak" has almost become a curse. Backpack seems to be looking for another path: giving tokens the possibility of leading to equity, promoting a change in incentive methods.

In the past, the model we were familiar with was "earning tokens with products," where the project first creates a good product, and users earn token rewards by using it, such as fee sharing, liquidity mining, airdrops, etc. The token's value comes from the product's actual performance. Backpack's method is more like using token expectations to feed back into the company's valuation, i.e., equity binding, IPO narrative, using the expected value of tokens to quickly gather funds, community, and attention, thereby raising the company's valuation and accelerating financing and product iteration. Tokens are no longer just reward tools but valuation engines.

Of course, this transformation is full of uncertainty. How will regulation define it? How to balance rights between equity and tokens? Will the market really buy into the narrative of future shareholders? There are no ready-made answers to these questions. But in a pessimistic moment for the crypto industry, Backpack is at least trying to provide a new tension.

Backpack once rebuilt from the ruins; this time, it is building a bridge in the cracks of the system.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the key requirement for Backpack users to convert their staked tokens into equity?

AUsers must stake Backpack's native tokens for at least one year to be eligible for conversion into company equity at a fixed ratio.

QHow much of Backpack's equity has been reserved for the token-to-equity conversion plan?

ABackpack has reserved 20% of the company's equity for this token-to-equity conversion initiative.

QWhat distinguishes Backpack's development path from traditional centralized exchanges like Binance?

AUnlike Binance's 'trading first, ecosystem later' approach, Backpack started with a wallet and NFT ecosystem (Mad Lads) to build user trust and community before launching its exchange.

QWhat major regulatory challenge does Backpack face with its dual-token and equity model?

AThe primary regulatory challenge is the potential classification of tokens as securities by the SEC, which would require compliance with registration, disclosure, and anti-fraud rules, and could complicate IPO plans due to ownership conflicts and dual financing concerns.

QHow does Backpack's tokenomics model link token distribution to its IPO plans?

ABackpack's token distribution is structured in three phases: TGE (25% to users), pre-IPO (37.5% unlocked via milestones), and post-IPO (37.5% reserved for team/investors), directly tying token releases to IPO progression and company growth triggers.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit2 год тому

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit2 год тому

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit2 год тому

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片