Hong Kong Unveils New Rules To Allow Crypto Margin Financing And Perpetual Contracts

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-02-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-12

Анотація

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has introduced new rules allowing licensed virtual asset brokers to offer crypto margin financing and perpetual contracts to professional investors. Under the ASPIRe roadmap's Pillar P, eligible clients with strong credit and sufficient collateral can use Bitcoin and Ether as collateral for margin trading. The move aims to enhance market liquidity, provide risk management tools, and strengthen Hong Kong's position as a global virtual asset hub. The SFC emphasized the need for robust risk controls, as these products carry distinct risks. Executive Director Eric Yip stated that these measures are part of a broader strategy to cultivate market depth and investor confidence through regulated innovation.

Hong Kong financial authorities have announced new rules to expand the scope of product offerings, allowing the integration of crypto margin financing and perpetual contracts into the local virtual assets market.

Hong Kong Approves Crypto Margin Financing, Perps

On Wednesday, Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) unveiled a framework for licensed corporations that provide virtual asset dealing services (VA brokers) to offer virtual asset financing.

According to the SFC’s circular, the financial watchdog will permit VA brokers to extend credit to margin clients with strong credit profiles and sufficient securities collateral, under Pillar P of its Access, Safeguards, Products, Infrastructure and Relationships (ASPIRe) roadmap.

This will allow eligible margin clients to “increase their participation in VA trading, which can enhance the liquidity of Hong Kong’s VA market. At the same time, this can also facilitate the development of VA financing in a risk-controlled environment.”

Under the new guidance, only the two leading cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), will be eligible as VA collateral. The regulator also released a high-level framework for licensed virtual asset trading platforms to offer crypto perpetual contracts to professional investors.

“Under the ASPIRe roadmap, Pillar P reflects the SFC’s commitment to expanding the scope of product offerings, including Perps. This initiative aims to deepen market liquidity, broaden risk management tools for investors, and further strengthen Hong Kong’s position as a leading global virtual asset hub,” the watchdog affirmed.

The SFC emphasized that the introduction of Perps will bring new opportunities to the market, but noted that it also carries “a range of risks that are distinct from those associated with traditional futures or spot trading of virtual assets.”

Therefore, the framework requires platform operators to have robust management measures and transparent processes governing valuation, margining, collateralization, and liquidation management.

Hong Kong Digital Landscape In ‘Defining Stage’

Speaking at Consensus Hong Kong 2026 on Wednesday, Eric Yip, SFC’s Executive Director of Intermediaries, shared his views on the watchdog’s regulatory enhancements for the next phase of Hong Kong’s crypto assets ecosystem.

Yip affirmed that Hong Kong’s crypto asset development has entered a “defining stage, shaped by the SFC’s ASPIRe roadmap that outlines a future-proof regulatory framework aimed at deepening market quality, resilience, and global competitiveness.”

He emphasized this year’s focus on liquidity, “cultivating market depth, strengthening price discovery, and building investor confidence through a strategic blend of expanded access and responsible product innovation.”

As the executive explained, the SFC is expanding the city’s crypto product suite under Pillar P while maintaining regulatory guardrails aligned with traditional financial market standards.

Notably, Yip highlighted the SFC’s greenlight of crypto margin financing, which will be anchored to the existing securities margin financing framework. He noted that it will provide clarification on the use of crypto assets as collateral, “enabling responsible leverage that supports liquidity without undermining financial stability.”

In addition, he also outlined the new high-level framework for leveraged perpetual contracts for professional investors, which sets out a principles-based model.

Discussing how to bridge innovation and regulatory clarity, he pointed to the upcoming Digital Asset Accelerator to be set up under Pillar Re, which will serve as a structured communication channel between the regulatory agency and industry innovators.

He concluded that “liquidity does not emerge organically; it must be cultivated through openness, strong governance, and a purposeful regulatory design. Through targeted access reforms, product expansion, and structured innovation support, Hong Kong is well-positioned to become a leading global digital assets centre where liquidity thrives on a foundation of integrity, resilience, and international cooperation.”

Bitcoin trades at $68,307 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Пов'язані питання

QWhat new financial products has Hong Kong's SFC approved for the virtual assets market?

AHong Kong's SFC has approved crypto margin financing and perpetual contracts for professional investors.

QWhich two specific cryptocurrencies are eligible to be used as collateral under the new margin financing rules?

AOnly Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) are eligible as virtual asset collateral under the new guidance.

QWhat is the name of the SFC's roadmap that outlines this new regulatory framework?

AThe regulatory framework is part of the SFC's ASPIRe (Access, Safeguards, Products, Infrastructure and Relationships) roadmap.

QAccording to the SFC executive, what stage has Hong Kong's crypto asset development entered?

AAccording to Eric Yip, Hong Kong's crypto asset development has entered a 'defining stage'.

QWhat is the primary goal of introducing these new products like margin financing and perpetual contracts?

AThe primary goals are to enhance market liquidity, broaden risk management tools for investors, and strengthen Hong Kong's position as a leading global virtual asset hub.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit6 год тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit6 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手6 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手6 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit8 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit8 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手9 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手9 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit10 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit10 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси