Hong Kong To Grant Stablecoin Licenses In Q1, Financial Secretary Reveals At Davos

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-01-22Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-22

Анотація

Hong Kong's Financial Secretary Paul Chan announced at the World Economic Forum in Davos that the region will issue its first stablecoin licenses in Q1 of this year. This move aims to strengthen Hong Kong's position as a fintech hub. Chan emphasized the city’s "responsible and sustainable" regulatory approach, which balances innovation with strong safeguards for financial stability and investor protection. The HKMA has received 36 formal license applications from banks, tech firms, and Web3 startups, among others. The approval process will be stringent, with only a limited number of licenses granted initially. Hong Kong has already issued $2.1 billion in tokenized green bonds and established a licensing framework for virtual asset trading platforms.

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Hong Kong’s Financial Secretary, Paul Chan Mo-po, announced the region’s plan to issue licenses for stablecoin providers in the first quarter of this year as the city seeks to strengthen its position as a leading hub for financial technology.

Hong Kong’s Regulatory Framework

Chan highlighted Hong Kong’s regulatory framework for digital assets, describing it as “responsible and sustainable.” He emphasized the importance of a balanced approach to support the growth of both finance and technology, noting that these two sectors are “mutually reinforcing.”

Chan articulated the benefits of digital assets, pointing out that they can enhance transparency, improve risk management, and facilitate more efficient capital movement. “We view digital assets as a financial innovation that we should embrace proactively,” he stated.

The Finance chief elaborated on the necessity of ensuring that digital assets serve the real economy while simultaneously implementing strong guardrails to mitigate risks related to financial stability, market integrity, and investor protection.

He reiterated the principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation,” which is designed to promote a healthy, responsible, and sustainable environment for digital asset development. The government and regulators, he asserted, will act as “market enablers,” setting a precedent for innovation.

First Stablecoin Licenses Soon

Over the past couple of yeaers, Hong Kong has prioritized strengthening its position as a fintech hub, particularly in light of the US’s efforts to fulfill President Donald Trump’s vision of establishing the country as the global centre for crypto.

Chan pointed out that since 2023, the city has issued three batches of tokenized green bonds totaling $2.1 billion. Additionally, Hong Kong has already established a licensing framework for virtual asset trading platforms.

Notably, last November, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) launched a controlled pilot program to facilitate real-value transactions using tokenized deposits and digital assets.

During his remarks, Chan specifically mentioned the upcoming licensing regime for stablecoins, indicating that the first batch of licenses is expected to be issued soon.

According to reports from the HKMA, the authority received formal stablecoin license applications from 36 institutions by September 30, nearly half of the 77 expressions of interest recorded in August.

Applicants for these licenses include a diverse range of entities, such as banks, technology firms, securities and asset management companies, e-commerce platforms, payment service providers, and Web3 startups.

A spokesperson for the HKMA stated that the authority will review all submission materials meticulously and conduct approvals in line with the new Stablecoin Ordinance and relevant regulatory requirements.

While the HKMA aims to announce the first batch of licensed stablecoin issuers between the first and second quarter, it has advised that the licensing process will be stringent, with only a limited number of licenses granted during this initial phase.

The 1-D chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation at $2.9 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did Hong Kong's Financial Secretary announce regarding stablecoin licenses at the World Economic Forum in Davos?

AHong Kong's Financial Secretary, Paul Chan Mo-po, announced that the region plans to issue licenses for stablecoin providers in the first quarter of this year.

QWhat principle did Chan reiterate to promote a healthy environment for digital asset development?

AChan reiterated the principle of 'same activity, same risk, same regulation' to promote a healthy, responsible, and sustainable environment for digital asset development.

QHow many stablecoin license applications did the HKMA receive by September 30, and how many expressions of interest were recorded in August?

AThe HKMA received formal stablecoin license applications from 36 institutions by September 30, which was nearly half of the 77 expressions of interest recorded in August.

QWhat types of entities have applied for stablecoin licenses in Hong Kong?

AApplicants for stablecoin licenses include a diverse range of entities such as banks, technology firms, securities and asset management companies, e-commerce platforms, payment service providers, and Web3 startups.

QWhat is the HKMA's timeline for announcing the first batch of licensed stablecoin issuers?

AThe HKMA aims to announce the first batch of licensed stablecoin issuers between the first and second quarter of this year.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit4 год тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit4 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手4 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手4 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit7 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit7 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手8 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手8 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit9 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit9 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси