Hong Kong to Allow Institutional Crypto Perpetual Futures Under New Rules

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-11Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-11

Анотація

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) is set to introduce a new regulatory framework allowing licensed trading platforms to offer cryptocurrency perpetual futures contracts. Initially limited to institutional investors, these contracts enable traders to speculate on crypto prices without an expiry date. Platforms must demonstrate robust risk management and disclosure practices. Brokers will be permitted to use Bitcoin and Ethereum as collateral for client financing, subject to strict credit standards. The SFC is also implementing measures to prevent conflicts of interest, requiring exchanges to separate market-making activities into independent units. This cautious, step-by-step approach aims to balance innovation with credibility, attract global institutions, and enhance liquidity while prioritizing transparency and risk management.

Hong Kong is planning to become a leading regulated hub for digital assets. Julia Leung, SFC Chief Executive, speaking at CoinDesk, says that the watchdog will soon publish a high-level regulatory framework that allows licensed trading platforms to offer perpetual futures contracts tied to cryptocurrencies.

Initially limited to institutional investors

Under the upcoming framework, perpetual futures allow traders to speculate on prices without an expiry date. Leung says that initially, it will be allowed only for institutional investors, and platforms must prove they can manage and disclose the risk properly. SFC will remain focused on the fair market rules for the customers.

On the other hand, regulators will allow brokers to finance the clients using selected digital assets as collateral. As the crypto markets have high volatility, the eligibility starts only with Bitcoin and Ethereum. Borrowers must meet strict credit standards. The regulators are moving cautiously with the most stable and established tokens.

SFC is also refining the exchanges that want to run market-making operations; they must separate those activities into independent units and maintain clear conflict of interest controls. This is aimed at preventing exchanges that might see the users’ trading activity and can use that information to make money.

Reason behind this move

The SFC is trying to balance innovation and credibility. The official wants more sophisticated products and greater participation from global institutions. Instead of approving everything at once, the regulators are widening the access step by step.

If this move has been implemented, then Hong Kong could attract hedge funds and trading firms that rely on perpetuals and will increase liquidity in local regulated venues. But the regulator’s goal is clear: that innovations will be welcomed within a framework that prioritizes transparency and risk management.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ethereum Remains Under Pressure as Price Consolidates Near $2,000

TagsCryptoCryptocurrencyHong Kong

Пов'язані питання

QWhat new type of cryptocurrency product will Hong Kong allow under its upcoming regulatory framework?

AHong Kong will allow licensed trading platforms to offer perpetual futures contracts tied to cryptocurrencies.

QWho will be permitted to trade these crypto perpetual futures initially?

AInitially, trading will be allowed only for institutional investors.

QWhich two cryptocurrencies are eligible to be used as collateral for client financing under the new rules?

ABitcoin and Ethereum are the eligible cryptocurrencies that can be used as collateral.

QWhat is one of the key requirements for exchanges that want to run market-making operations?

AThey must separate their market-making activities into independent units and maintain clear conflict of interest controls.

QWhat is the primary goal of the SFC in implementing these new regulations, according to the article?

AThe SFC is trying to balance innovation and credibility, welcoming innovations within a framework that prioritizes transparency and risk management.

Пов'язані матеріали

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit40 хв тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit40 хв тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit52 хв тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit52 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片