Has the Cryptocurrency Market Hit Bottom? Here's What Institutions Think

Foresight NewsОпубліковано о 2026-06-16Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-16

Анотація

"Has the crypto market bottomed out? Major institutions are divided on the outlook, according to a recent analysis by Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer of Bitwise. Three prominent research firms published in-depth reports on the topic with differing conclusions. Galaxy Digital argues Bitcoin has not yet found its bottom, pointing to only 4 out of 13 historical bottoming indicators being met. Their analysis suggests a potential bottom range of $30,000 to $54,000. NYDIG adopts a more cautious stance, noting that while metrics are close to historical bear market lows, a classic panic-selling capitulation event is missing. They acknowledge the possibility of a bottom but consider it unlikely, citing structural changes from institutional adoption. In contrast, Standard Chartered Bank asserts the bottom is already in at around $59,000. Their revised bullish view, predicting a year-end target of $100,000, hinges on anticipated reductions in ETF selling pressure linked to events like a potential SpaceX IPO. Despite the surface-level disagreement on the exact price floor, the reports share significant common ground crucial for long-term investors. All three institutions agree that a market bottom will likely form within the current year, that current prices are closer to the bottom than to previous cycle highs, and that Bitcoin is poised for another major bull cycle in the future. The core takeaway is that while the precise bottom level remains debated, the long-term value prop...


Authored by: Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer, Bitwise

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News


Over the past two weeks, three cryptocurrency research firms I have long followed—other than Bitwise—have published in-depth reports addressing the same issue: Has the cryptocurrency market reached its bottom?


  • Galaxy Digital: Bitcoin has not bottomed yet; data points to a potential bottoming zone.
  • NYDIG: What factors are currently suppressing Bitcoin's price performance?
  • Standard Chartered: The market bottom has already occurred.


The three reports are detailed, containing a wealth of data and complete logical reasoning, and are worth reading in full. However, if you're looking for a simple, unified answer, you might be disappointed: the judgments given by these three authoritative institutions are completely different.


Has the Market Bottomed?


  • Galaxy Digital: No
  • NYDIG: Possibly, but not very likely
  • Standard Chartered: Yes


Below, we break down the core logic of each institution one by one.


Three Institutions, Three Views


Galaxy Digital


Galaxy Digital reviewed Bitcoin's full 17-year price history and summarized 13 indicators that typically appear simultaneously when the market truly bottoms out. These cover six dimensions: valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, price trends, bull/bear cycles, and market sentiment. Long-term Bitcoin investors are familiar with these indicators, including the 200-week moving average, Fear & Greed Index, Mayer Multiple, etc.


Galaxy found that currently only 4 indicators fully meet the criteria, 2 are partially met, and the remaining 7 have not triggered a bottom signal. The report concludes that the bottom range for this Bitcoin cycle is between $30,000 and $54,000, with a neutral baseline bottom of $40,000 to $46,000.



NYDIG


NYDIG also adopts a multi-indicator comprehensive analysis framework, comparing the current market with historical cycles, assessing the market status from dimensions such as the duration of maximum drawdown and holder profit/loss (what Bitcoin users call 'MVRV,' or the market value to realized value ratio).


NYDIG believes that current indicators are very close to the extreme ranges of historical major bottoms, but the hallmark widespread panic selling seen in past major bear markets has not yet occurred. However, the report introduces a variable: the entry of institutional funds has fundamentally changed Bitcoin's cycle logic. The magnitude of this correction might be smaller than in historical bear markets. From this perspective, the bottom might also have already appeared.



Standard Chartered


Standard Chartered is not unwaveringly bullish on Bitcoin. Back in February when Bitcoin was at $67,000, the bank lowered its full-year price forecast, warning that the price could fall to $50,000, citing a weaker macroeconomic environment and sustained selling pressure from Bitcoin ETFs.


But last Friday, Standard Chartered updated its view, identifying $59,000 as the bottom of this cycle. The two main logics supporting this view are: a potential diplomatic agreement between the US and Iran, and the highly anticipated upcoming SpaceX IPO. Standard Chartered believes that the substantial selling by ETF holders was to raise funds for participating in the SpaceX listing, and this selling pressure will gradually subside. Standard Chartered's latest forecast is that Bitcoin will challenge $100,000 within the year.


Consensus Far Outweighs Differences in the Three Reports


You might wonder, what useful information can be extracted from three reports with seemingly opposing views? In fact, the underlying consensus in these three reports far outweighs the surface differences. For long-term investors, the conclusions they agree on are far more valuable than their disagreements:


  • All three judge that the market bottom for this cycle will occur within this year.
  • All three believe the current price is closer to the bottom than to the previous high.
  • All three unanimously remain bullish, expecting Bitcoin to usher in a new bull market in the future.


At the time of writing this article, Bitcoin is trading around $67,000. One report claims the bottom at $59,000 has already occurred, one sees a potential drop to $50,000, and another a neutral baseline bottom of $43,000. But the core conclusion is highly unified: a bottom will definitely be reached within the year.


This is the key point long-term investors should focus on. Whether the bottom is at $40,000, $50,000, or $60,000, the difference is actually limited. What truly matters is whether Bitcoin can subsequently surge to $100,000, $200,000, or even $1 million. As long as it reaches those levels, entering and holding long-term at the current price offers considerable upside potential.


A rather ironic phenomenon in the current market is that everyone is obsessing over whether the market has bottomed, while overlooking a more important question—has the top already appeared? In my view, as long as the peak has not arrived, Bitcoin retains its long-term allocation value.


The core logic supporting Bitcoin's long-term value has not only persisted but continues to strengthen: government debt continues to accumulate worldwide with no effective resolution in sight; inflation constantly erodes the real purchasing power of wealth; public trust in centralized institutions like governments and banks continues to decline; the global digitalization process keeps accelerating; Bitcoin's trading and investment channels are constantly improving; and the early crypto-native demographic is aging, with their assets and industry influence growing simultaneously.


Of course, potential risks remain in the market, including threats from quantum computing and tightening global regulation. However, on balance, the current situation looks better than in any previous crypto winter.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the three major research institutions mentioned in the article and their respective views on whether the crypto market has bottomed?

AThe three institutions are Galaxy Digital, NYDIG, and Standard Chartered. Their views are: Galaxy Digital believes the market has not bottomed yet. NYDIG considers it possible but unlikely that the bottom has been reached. Standard Chartered asserts that the bottom has already appeared at $59,000.

QAccording to Galaxy Digital, how many out of its 13 identified bottoming indicators are currently signaling a market bottom?

AAccording to Galaxy Digital's analysis, only 4 of the 13 indicators are fully met, 2 are partially met, and 7 have not yet signaled a bottom.

QWhat is the core consensus shared by the three research reports despite their differing views on the exact bottom price?

AThe core consensus is threefold: 1) The market bottom will occur within this year. 2) The current price is closer to the bottom than to the previous all-time high. 3) All three institutions are optimistic that Bitcoin will experience a new bull market in the future.

QWhat two specific reasons did Standard Chartered give for revising its view and declaring that the market bottomed at $59,000?

AStandard Chartered based its revised view on two primary reasons: 1) A potential diplomatic agreement between the US and Iran. 2) The upcoming, highly anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe led to ETF selling pressure as investors raised funds to participate, and this pressure is expected to subside.

QWhat does Matt Hougan, the author and Bitwise CIO, suggest is a more important question for long-term investors than whether the market has bottomed?

AMatt Hougan suggests that a more important question for long-term investors is whether the market top has already appeared. He argues that as long as the peak has not been reached, Bitcoin retains its value as a long-term investment.

Пов'язані матеріали

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit7 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit7 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手10 хв тому

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手10 хв тому

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

The article discusses Bitcoin's recent price movement above $66,000 and a shift in market analysis from focusing on a local bottom to a potential macro-cycle bottom. It cites a crypto analyst noting that BTC has flashed three historical technical signals that previously coincided with major market bottoms in 2015, 2019, and 2022, suggesting the current zone could be a strong long-term accumulation area. However, the article also highlights a significant challenge: despite the price breakout, on-chain data shows a lack of supporting liquidity. Stablecoin dominance is rising while the total stablecoin market cap is shrinking, with capital continuing to leave exchanges. This divergence indicates that while the technical setup is bullish, the rally may struggle to sustain enough momentum for a decisive move into the $70,000 region without an influx of fresh capital.

ambcrypto12 хв тому

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

ambcrypto12 хв тому

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手26 хв тому

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手26 хв тому

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit53 хв тому

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit53 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片