GTreasury unveils ‘Ripple Treasury’ – Is TradFi about to get disrupted?

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-29Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-29

Анотація

Ripple and GTreasury have launched "Ripple Treasury," a product integrating XRPL blockchain rails with GTreasury's enterprise treasury software. This partnership aims to streamline financial operations for GTreasury's network of 13,000 banks, targeting faster, cheaper cross-border payments and offering full cash visibility for flows up to $12.5 trillion. Ripple's native stablecoin, RLUSD, which has seen significant growth and dominates XRPL's stablecoin market, provides the on-chain liquidity. This move positions XRPL as a bridge into traditional finance (TradFi), using blockchain to enhance efficiency, liquidity management, and risk oversight in banking operations.

What started as tech to support “decentralization” has now found its footing in the financial world. With how things are shaping up, the future looks bright for decentralized finance (DeFi) and the way we handle money.

Payments are naturally the ground most L1 blockchains are now targeting as a bridge from TradFi to DeFi. Ripple’s [XRP] $1 billion acquisition of GTreasury last year, for instance, was a major step in line with this strategy.

Building on that move, Ripple and GTreasury have now teamed up to launch Ripple Treasury, aiming for faster cross-border payments by plugging XRPL rails into GTreasury’s enterprise-grade treasury software.

As noted on Ripple’s official website, the goal of the treasury is to streamline financial operations for GTreasury’s network of 13,000 banks, offering 100% cash visibility and supporting flows of up to $12.5 trillion.

At the macro level, this move is another major boost for XRPL’s real-world adoption. Its native stablecoin, RLUSD, powers these payments by providing on-chain liquidity, faster settlement, and a seamless experience.

In short, this partnership shows how blockchain can do what traditional banks do, but faster, cheaper, and more efficiently. Naturally, it raises a key question: Is this Ripple’s first “real” step toward outpacing TradFi?

Ripple brings blockchain speed to banks

Ripple’s RLUSD is showing its growing impact in the market.

According to DeFiLlama, its circulating supply on XRPL has jumped 15.36% over the past 30 days, bringing the total to 388 million. That’s 60 million added in on-chain liquidity, ready as dry powder for real-world use.

And it’s not stopping there. The total stablecoin market on XRPL hit a $400 million ATH, with $100 million added so far in 2026. RLUSD makes up 83% of that, cementing its role as the backbone of the network’s liquidity.

In this context, Ripple’s push into TradFi isn’t random.

Instead, its growing stablecoin presence is positioning XRPL as a bridge. Think of it this way: RLUSD acts like a digital highway, letting banks move money instantly while still connecting to the systems they already use.

However, with Ripple Treasury now in place, the system adds a full suite of enterprise-grade treasury tools like liquidity management, risk oversight, and payments, bringing blockchain speed straight into traditional finance.

Against this backdrop, the Ripple–GTreasury partnership isn’t just another move to support banks. Instead, it’s a strategic push into the heart of TradFi, using stablecoins to make banking operations more efficient.


Final Thoughts

  • Ripple and GTreasury have launched a Ripple Treasury to integrate XRPL rails with GTreasury’s enterprise-grade tools.
  • Ripple is positioning XRPL as a bridge for traditional finance, using stablecoins to make banking faster, cheaper, and more efficient.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main goal of the newly launched 'Ripple Treasury' by GTreasury and Ripple?

AThe main goal of Ripple Treasury is to streamline financial operations for GTreasury's network of 13,000 banks by offering 100% cash visibility, supporting massive payment flows, and enabling faster cross-border payments by integrating XRPL's blockchain rails with GTreasury's enterprise-grade treasury software.

QHow does Ripple's stablecoin, RLUSD, contribute to the XRPL ecosystem according to the article?

ARLUSD provides on-chain liquidity, enables faster settlement, and offers a seamless payment experience. It acts as the backbone of the network's liquidity, making up 83% of the total stablecoin market on XRPL, which recently hit a $400 million all-time high.

QWhat was the strategic significance of Ripple's $1 billion acquisition of GTreasury last year?

AThe acquisition was a major strategic step to bridge TradFi and DeFi, specifically targeting the payments sector. It laid the foundation for integrating Ripple's blockchain technology with GTreasury's established treasury management tools for traditional financial institutions.

QWhat specific advantages does the article claim blockchain technology has over traditional banking (TradFi)?

AThe article states that blockchain can perform the same functions as traditional banks but with greater speed, lower cost, and higher efficiency. It highlights faster cross-border payments, improved liquidity management, and enhanced risk oversight as key advantages.

QHow much has the circulating supply of RLUSD on XRPL increased in the past 30 days, and what does this signify?

AThe circulating supply of RLUSD on XRPL has jumped 15.36% in the past 30 days, adding 60 million in on-chain liquidity. This growth signifies increasing market adoption and readiness of 'dry powder' for real-world financial use cases.

Пов'язані матеріали

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit33 хв тому

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbit33 хв тому

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit40 хв тому

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit40 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片