Grayscale Updates S-1 Filing for Sui Staking ETF as SUI Trades Near $1.44

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-27

Анотація

Grayscale Investments has amended its S-1 filing with the SEC for a Sui Staking ETF (ticker: GSUI), seeking to list it on NYSE Arca. The filing details staking mechanics and risks, with BNY Mellon as the administrator and Coinbase as the prime broker and custodian. This move reflects growing institutional crypto ETF interest, following Bitwise's similar SUI fund filings. Concurrently, SUI trades at $1.44 with a $5.44B market cap, as its 24-hour trading volume dropped 33% to $547M. The token faces a major unlock of 43.5M tokens (worth ~$63M) next week, potentially increasing selling pressure, while its derivatives open interest rose 8% to $729.3M.

Grayscale Investments has advanced in launching a Sui Exchange Traded Fund (ETF), amending its S-1 registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). As it intends to change the name of the trust to Grayscale Sui Staking ETF, under the ticker GSUI, which aims to be listed and traded on the NYSE Arca exchange.

The updated Grayscale filing provides additional detail on staking mechanics, risk disclosures, and structural elements as the Grayscale firm seeks formal regulatory approval to offer investors exposure to SUI’s price plus potential yield from staking.

Also, the Bank of New York Mellon will serve as the transfer agent and the administrator of the Grayscale Sui Staking ETF. Meanwhile, Coinbase is named as the prime broker, and Coinbase Custody Trust Company as the custodian of the trust.

This Grayscale filing comes as institutional interest in crypto ETFs continues to rise, as Bitwise has already filed for SUI-based funds and is looking for approval for 10 new exchange-traded funds (ETFs), potentially boosting regulatory momentum and investor confidence in the SUI token.

Sui Trades Ahead of Major Token Unlock

SUI is trading at $1.44 currently, with a market cap of around $5.44 billion. With that, market activity has also slowed, with 24-hour trading volume declining by 33%, reaching to $547 million, indicating lower participation. As SUI’s price moved in a limited intraday range of $1.43 to $1.46, indicating persistent consolidation and a lack of a strong directional move, at the time of writing.

Adding to that, as per Tokenomist data, SUI is set to unlock 43.5 million tokens next week, which is worth around $63 million. Where these unlocks frequently come with concerns that could lead to selling pressure if demand cannot absorb the additional tokens.

Meanwhile, derivatives data provides a different outlook, as per Coinglass, open interest increased by almost 8% in the previous 24 hours, hitting $729.3 million at the time of writing.

Highlighted Crypto news today:

Bitwise Launches First On-Chain DeFi Vault Using Morpho for Stablecoin Yield

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the name and ticker symbol of the new ETF proposed by Grayscale Investments?

AThe proposed ETF is named Grayscale Sui Staking ETF and will trade under the ticker symbol GSUI.

QWhich financial institutions are involved in the Grayscale Sui Staking ETF as transfer agent, administrator, and custodian?

AThe Bank of New York Mellon will serve as the transfer agent and administrator, while Coinbase Custody Trust Company will act as the custodian.

QAt what price was SUI trading and what was its market capitalization at the time of the article?

ASUI was trading at $1.44 with a market capitalization of approximately $5.44 billion.

QWhat significant token event is scheduled for SUI next week and what is its potential market impact?

ASUI is set to unlock 43.5 million tokens worth approximately $63 million next week, which could create selling pressure if market demand cannot absorb the additional supply.

QHow did SUI's derivatives market data contrast with its spot trading volume according to the article?

AWhile the 24-hour spot trading volume declined by 33% to $547 million, open interest in derivatives increased by almost 8% to $729.3 million, indicating differing market sentiments.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit28 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit28 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit36 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit36 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News40 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News40 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit47 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit47 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit56 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think