Gold Plunged Over 4%, Silver Crashed 11%, Did the US Stock Market Plunge Trigger Algorithmic Selling in Precious Metals?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-02-13Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-13

Анотація

Gold and silver prices plummeted sharply on Thursday, with gold dropping over 4% and silver plunging nearly 11%, amid a broader sell-off in metals triggered by a significant decline in U.S. equities. The Nasdaq fell more than 2%, prompting some traders to liquidate commodity positions—including gold, silver, copper, platinum, and palladium—to cover losses in equities and seek liquidity. A strong dollar and risk-off sentiment contributed to the decline. The sharp and sudden downturn was largely attributed to algorithmic and momentum-driven trading. After a period of sustained gains, metals faced heavy selling pressure as key technical levels were breached, leading to automated sell orders. Some analysts characterized the move as a "vacuum-style drop," typical of systematic trading strategies during periods of market stress. Despite the sell-off, many analysts remain bullish on gold’s longer-term prospects, citing ongoing geopolitical risks, questions around Federal Reserve policy, and a broader shift away from traditional assets. Major banks, including J.P. Morgan and Deutsche Bank, maintain positive year-end targets. Market participants are now closely watching upcoming U.S. economic data, particularly the CPI release, for clues on the Fed’s interest rate path, as lower rates generally support non-yielding assets like precious metals.

On Thursday, US stocks fell sharply, with the Nasdaq dropping over 2%. Some traders sold precious metals to cover losses in the stock market, leading to significant declines in gold, silver, copper, platinum, and palladium. The US Dollar Index saw a slight increase.

Amid renewed concerns over whether massive AI investments can truly be implemented on a large scale, US tech stocks declined. Metal prices suddenly dropped amid suspected algorithmic trading sell-offs, with some investors forced to exit commodity positions, including metals, for liquidity, while some funds shifted to US Treasuries for safety.

Spot gold once fell by 4.1%, while silver plummeted by 11%. Copper prices on the London Metal Exchange (LME) dropped by 2.9%. Metal prices later pared some of their losses:

At the close of New York trading on Thursday, spot gold fell 3.26% to $4,918.36 per ounce. Before 00:00 Beijing time, it maintained a slight decline, largely holding above $5,050, before experiencing a sharp plunge, hitting a daily low of $4,878.66. COMEX gold futures fell 3.06% to $4,942.50 per ounce.

At the close of New York trading on Thursday (February 12), spot silver fell 10.89% to $75.0942 per ounce. Before 00:00 Beijing time, it held steady above $82 with a slight decline, before a sharp drop below $76, hitting a daily low of $74.4456 near the close of US stocks. COMEX silver futures fell 10.56% to $75.050 per ounce.

Other important metals: COMEX copper futures fell 3.65% to $5.7740 per pound, spot platinum fell 6.19%, and spot palladium fell 5.89%.

What Do Analysts Say?

Regarding Thursday's gold and silver movements, industry insiders said: "This all happened too fast, it felt like a risk-off move. During periods of extreme market stress, even safe-haven assets like gold are sold by investors in urgent need of liquidity."

Part of the selling in gold and silver on Thursday also stemmed from profit-taking, as the previous rapid rally was partly driven by speculative buying.

Some industry insiders pointed out that for gold and silver, trading is still largely driven by sentiment and momentum. On days like this, they struggle.

Since 2024, gold and silver have surged strongly, with momentum-driven buying pushing metal prices to repeated new records. However, this trend halted abruptly on January 29, when gold recorded its largest single-day drop in over a decade, and silver saw its biggest decline on record. Since then, both metals have traded in a narrow range with increased volatility, lacking new catalysts.

Some analysts believe that Thursday's sudden drop in gold prices does not signal an imminent sustained downtrend. However, it does increase the likelihood of continued volatility in the short term. The market has cleared a significant chunk of lower liquidity, and the next move will depend on how prices perform near key technical levels.

Media analysis noted that despite a slight rebound, overall, metal prices were hit hard in a sudden vacuum-like decline, more akin to systematic strategy selling—such as momentum-driven de-risking operations common among CTA (Commodity Trading Advisor) groups when key levels are breached.

Despite recent sharp declines, many analysts still expect gold to resume its upward trend, believing the factors that drove the earlier rally remain—including geopolitical tensions, doubts about the Fed's independence, and a broader shift from traditional assets like currencies and sovereign bonds to alternative assets. J.P. Morgan Private Bank expects gold to reach $6,000 to $6,300 per ounce by year-end, while Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs maintain bullish views.

The world's largest silver ETF, iShares Silver Trust, saw significant trading in May/June $125 strike call options, while investors sold contracts previously bought at high levels, which may have further intensified selling pressure on silver.

Traders are now focusing on US economic data, including the key CPI data to be released on Friday, for clues on the Fed's interest rate path. Lower borrowing costs typically benefit non-yielding precious metals.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the main reason for the sharp decline in precious metals like gold and silver according to the article?

AThe decline was primarily triggered by algorithmic trading sell-offs, as investors sold precious metals to cover losses in the stock market and obtain liquidity during a risk-off event.

QHow much did spot silver drop at its lowest point during the trading session?

ASpot silver plummeted by 10.89%, reaching a low of 74.4456 dollars per ounce.

QWhat broader market movement coincided with the sell-off in precious metals?

AThe sell-off coincided with a significant drop in U.S. tech stocks, with the Nasdaq falling over 2%, amid renewed worries about the large-scale implementation of AI investments.

QDespite the recent drop, what is the outlook for gold from major banks like J.P. Morgan according to the analysts in the article?

AAnalysts from J.P. Morgan Private Bank expect gold to reach $6,000 to $6,300 per ounce by the end of the year, maintaining a bullish outlook.

QWhat upcoming economic data are traders focusing on for clues about the Federal Reserve's policy?

ATraders are focusing on the upcoming U.S. CPI data to find clues about the Federal Reserve's future interest rate path.

Пов'язані матеріали

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit47 хв тому

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit47 хв тому

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit1 год тому

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit1 год тому

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit1 год тому

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити 4

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку 4 (4) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити 4 (4).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої 4 (4)Після придбання 4 (4) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля 4 (4)Легко торгуйте 4 (4) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

414 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2025.10.20Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити 4

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни 4 (4).

活动图片