Gold Plunged Over 4%, Silver Crashed 11%, Did the US Stock Market Plunge Trigger Algorithmic Selling in Precious Metals?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-02-13Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-13

Анотація

Gold and silver prices plummeted sharply on Thursday, with gold dropping over 4% and silver plunging nearly 11%, amid a broader sell-off in metals triggered by a significant decline in U.S. equities. The Nasdaq fell more than 2%, prompting some traders to liquidate commodity positions—including gold, silver, copper, platinum, and palladium—to cover losses in equities and seek liquidity. A strong dollar and risk-off sentiment contributed to the decline. The sharp and sudden downturn was largely attributed to algorithmic and momentum-driven trading. After a period of sustained gains, metals faced heavy selling pressure as key technical levels were breached, leading to automated sell orders. Some analysts characterized the move as a "vacuum-style drop," typical of systematic trading strategies during periods of market stress. Despite the sell-off, many analysts remain bullish on gold’s longer-term prospects, citing ongoing geopolitical risks, questions around Federal Reserve policy, and a broader shift away from traditional assets. Major banks, including J.P. Morgan and Deutsche Bank, maintain positive year-end targets. Market participants are now closely watching upcoming U.S. economic data, particularly the CPI release, for clues on the Fed’s interest rate path, as lower rates generally support non-yielding assets like precious metals.

On Thursday, US stocks fell sharply, with the Nasdaq dropping over 2%. Some traders sold precious metals to cover losses in the stock market, leading to significant declines in gold, silver, copper, platinum, and palladium. The US Dollar Index saw a slight increase.

Amid renewed concerns over whether massive AI investments can truly be implemented on a large scale, US tech stocks declined. Metal prices suddenly dropped amid suspected algorithmic trading sell-offs, with some investors forced to exit commodity positions, including metals, for liquidity, while some funds shifted to US Treasuries for safety.

Spot gold once fell by 4.1%, while silver plummeted by 11%. Copper prices on the London Metal Exchange (LME) dropped by 2.9%. Metal prices later pared some of their losses:

At the close of New York trading on Thursday, spot gold fell 3.26% to $4,918.36 per ounce. Before 00:00 Beijing time, it maintained a slight decline, largely holding above $5,050, before experiencing a sharp plunge, hitting a daily low of $4,878.66. COMEX gold futures fell 3.06% to $4,942.50 per ounce.

At the close of New York trading on Thursday (February 12), spot silver fell 10.89% to $75.0942 per ounce. Before 00:00 Beijing time, it held steady above $82 with a slight decline, before a sharp drop below $76, hitting a daily low of $74.4456 near the close of US stocks. COMEX silver futures fell 10.56% to $75.050 per ounce.

Other important metals: COMEX copper futures fell 3.65% to $5.7740 per pound, spot platinum fell 6.19%, and spot palladium fell 5.89%.

What Do Analysts Say?

Regarding Thursday's gold and silver movements, industry insiders said: "This all happened too fast, it felt like a risk-off move. During periods of extreme market stress, even safe-haven assets like gold are sold by investors in urgent need of liquidity."

Part of the selling in gold and silver on Thursday also stemmed from profit-taking, as the previous rapid rally was partly driven by speculative buying.

Some industry insiders pointed out that for gold and silver, trading is still largely driven by sentiment and momentum. On days like this, they struggle.

Since 2024, gold and silver have surged strongly, with momentum-driven buying pushing metal prices to repeated new records. However, this trend halted abruptly on January 29, when gold recorded its largest single-day drop in over a decade, and silver saw its biggest decline on record. Since then, both metals have traded in a narrow range with increased volatility, lacking new catalysts.

Some analysts believe that Thursday's sudden drop in gold prices does not signal an imminent sustained downtrend. However, it does increase the likelihood of continued volatility in the short term. The market has cleared a significant chunk of lower liquidity, and the next move will depend on how prices perform near key technical levels.

Media analysis noted that despite a slight rebound, overall, metal prices were hit hard in a sudden vacuum-like decline, more akin to systematic strategy selling—such as momentum-driven de-risking operations common among CTA (Commodity Trading Advisor) groups when key levels are breached.

Despite recent sharp declines, many analysts still expect gold to resume its upward trend, believing the factors that drove the earlier rally remain—including geopolitical tensions, doubts about the Fed's independence, and a broader shift from traditional assets like currencies and sovereign bonds to alternative assets. J.P. Morgan Private Bank expects gold to reach $6,000 to $6,300 per ounce by year-end, while Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs maintain bullish views.

The world's largest silver ETF, iShares Silver Trust, saw significant trading in May/June $125 strike call options, while investors sold contracts previously bought at high levels, which may have further intensified selling pressure on silver.

Traders are now focusing on US economic data, including the key CPI data to be released on Friday, for clues on the Fed's interest rate path. Lower borrowing costs typically benefit non-yielding precious metals.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the main reason for the sharp decline in precious metals like gold and silver according to the article?

AThe decline was primarily triggered by algorithmic trading sell-offs, as investors sold precious metals to cover losses in the stock market and obtain liquidity during a risk-off event.

QHow much did spot silver drop at its lowest point during the trading session?

ASpot silver plummeted by 10.89%, reaching a low of 74.4456 dollars per ounce.

QWhat broader market movement coincided with the sell-off in precious metals?

AThe sell-off coincided with a significant drop in U.S. tech stocks, with the Nasdaq falling over 2%, amid renewed worries about the large-scale implementation of AI investments.

QDespite the recent drop, what is the outlook for gold from major banks like J.P. Morgan according to the analysts in the article?

AAnalysts from J.P. Morgan Private Bank expect gold to reach $6,000 to $6,300 per ounce by the end of the year, maintaining a bullish outlook.

QWhat upcoming economic data are traders focusing on for clues about the Federal Reserve's policy?

ATraders are focusing on the upcoming U.S. CPI data to find clues about the Federal Reserve's future interest rate path.

Пов'язані матеріали

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit5 хв тому

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit5 хв тому

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit12 хв тому

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit12 хв тому

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit21 хв тому

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit21 хв тому

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit24 хв тому

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit24 хв тому

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit26 хв тому

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit26 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити 4

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку 4 (4) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити 4 (4).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої 4 (4)Після придбання 4 (4) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля 4 (4)Легко торгуйте 4 (4) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

414 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2025.10.20Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити 4

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни 4 (4).

活动图片