‘Gold is up $50, Bitcoin is down 4%’ – Peter Schiff highlights the rift between crypto and TradFi

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-23Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-23

Анотація

Amid global economic uncertainty, a stark divergence emerged between traditional safe-haven assets and cryptocurrencies. Gold and silver reached record highs, with gold surpassing $5,175 and silver exceeding $87. In contrast, Bitcoin fell over 5%, dropping below the key $65,000 support level. Economist Peter Schiff highlighted this growing rift, arguing Bitcoin failed to act as a reliable store of value during market stress. The Bitcoin-to-gold ratio has declined sharply, with one BTC now buying only 13 ounces of gold compared to 38 ounces in late 2024—a more than 62% drop in purchasing power. Similarly, Bitcoin’s value against silver has fallen over 70% since mid-2025. While some analysts see the current low ratio as a buying opportunity, the trend shows investors are favoring precious metals over crypto. For Bitcoin to reclaim its safe-haven status, it must demonstrate stability rather than behave like a high-risk tech stock.

During the weekend, the idea of a safe-haven investment was put to the test. At a time when investors were looking for protection from global economic uncertainty, the market showed a clear divide.

Gold and silver surged to record highs, while Bitcoin [BTC] moved in the opposite direction. Gold crossed $5,175, and silver rose above $87.

In contrast, Bitcoin fell more than 5%, dropping below the key $65,000 support level.

Instead of acting like a reliable store of value, Bitcoin weakened during a period of stress, raising fresh doubts about its role as a safe asset.

Peter Schiff slams Bitcoin once again

Economist and long-time Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff highlighted this shift on X. He argued that the growing gap between precious metals and cryptocurrencies was not temporary.

Needless to say, the crypto community pushed back on Schiff’s comments and added,

“It’s always “Bitcoin is down 4%” on red days but never “Bitcoin is up 300% in a year” on green ones. Zoom out, Peter. The chart still scares gold bugs more than volatility scares us.”

Echoing similar sentiments, another X user added,

Source: The Bitcoin Therapist/X

While gold climbed above $5,100 per ounce, Bitcoin failed to act like a safe asset and was trading about 30% below its October 2025 peak.

Bitcoin vs. Gold

At its peak in December 2024, one Bitcoin could buy about 38 ounces of gold. By February 2026, that figure had fallen to roughly 13 ounces.

This sharp decline shows that Bitcoin has lost more than 62% of its value compared to gold in just over a year. Even though Bitcoin still looks stable in dollar terms, it is losing real buying power when measured against gold.

Silver’s rise and Bitcoin’s struggle

The gap becomes even clearer when we compare Bitcoin with silver. Since May 2025, Bitcoin’s value compared to silver has dropped by more than 70%.

This change is also visible in global rankings.

According to CompaniesMarketCap, gold and silver now rank first and second in total market value. Bitcoin has fallen to around 13th place, behind many traditional companies and physical assets.

What’s more?

All in all, the strong trend of 2024 and 2025, when many people saw Bitcoin as a good way to protect against inflation, is now weakening.

However, some analysts believe that the current low Bitcoin-to-gold ratio could be a good long-term buying chance. They think Bitcoin is cheap compared to gold.

Still, the overall market direction is clear. Even though more money is entering the system, investors are choosing gold and silver instead of crypto.

Therefore, if Bitcoin wants to be seen as a safe haven again, it needs to stop acting like a risky tech stock and start behaving more like a stable store of value.

Final Summary

Bitcoin’s drop below $65,000 weakened confidence in its role as a long-term store of value.
The sharp fall in the Bitcoin-to-gold ratio shows that Bitcoin is losing real purchasing power, not just price momentum.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did Peter Schiff highlight regarding the performance of gold and Bitcoin during a period of economic uncertainty?

APeter Schiff highlighted the growing gap between precious metals and cryptocurrencies, noting that gold surged to record highs while Bitcoin fell more than 5%, weakening during a period of stress and raising doubts about its role as a safe asset.

QHow much has Bitcoin's value declined compared to gold from its peak in December 2024 to February 2026?

ABitcoin has lost more than 62% of its value compared to gold, declining from being able to buy about 38 ounces of gold at its peak to roughly 13 ounces.

QAccording to the article, what ranks first and second in total market value on CompaniesMarketCap, and where does Bitcoin stand?

AGold and silver now rank first and second in total market value, while Bitcoin has fallen to around 13th place.

QWhat was the crypto community's response to Peter Schiff's criticism of Bitcoin's performance?

AThe crypto community pushed back, arguing that Schiff focuses on short-term losses and ignores long-term gains, such as Bitcoin being up 300% in a year, and advised to 'zoom out' to see the bigger picture.

QWhat does the article suggest Bitcoin needs to do to be seen as a safe haven asset again?

AThe article suggests that Bitcoin needs to stop acting like a risky tech stock and start behaving more like a stable store of value to regain its status as a safe haven asset.

Пов'язані матеріали

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit12 хв тому

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit12 хв тому

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit20 хв тому

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit20 хв тому

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报30 хв тому

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报30 хв тому

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbit37 хв тому

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbit37 хв тому

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess uncovered a severe data exposure trend linked to "vibe coding" or AI-powered software development tools. Their research found approximately 38,000 publicly accessible web applications built with platforms like Lovable, Base44, Netlify, and Replit. Of these, an estimated 2,000 apps exposed sensitive corporate and personal data, including medical records, financial information, internal strategic documents, and customer chat logs. In some cases, access even granted administrative privileges. The core issue stems from default privacy settings that make applications public by default, combined with a lack of built-in security controls (like authentication) in the AI-generated code. This allows employees without security expertise—"citizen developers"—to easily create and deploy applications that bypass standard corporate security reviews. The exposed apps, often indexed by search engines, are trivially discoverable. While some platform providers (Replit, Lovable, Wix/Base44) argue that security configuration is the user's responsibility and question the validity of some findings, security researchers confirm the widespread reality of such exposures. This pattern, also noted in prior studies, highlights a critical security gap as AI democratizes app creation, potentially leading to massive, unintentional data leaks.

marsbit1 год тому

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet