From Satoshi to Saylor: The Crypto Undercurrent in the Epstein Files

比推Опубліковано о 2026-02-03Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-03

Анотація

Recent disclosures from the "Epstein Files" reveal significant, previously unknown connections between the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and the cryptocurrency industry. As early as 2011, Epstein was aware of Bitcoin, calling it a "brilliant idea" with "serious flaws." The documents show he was involved in discussions about Bitcoin's nature, invested in the seed round of infrastructure firm Blockstream, and received updates on market developments from figures like a16z's Steven Sinofsky. The files suggest Epstein may have met with "some Bitcoin creators," potentially including Satoshi Nakamoto, raising questions about Bitcoin's origins and the U.S. government's knowledge. He also proposed creating Sharia-compliant digital currencies to Middle Eastern contacts. Additionally, the documents include a harsh critique of MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor from 2010, describing him as a socially awkward "weirdo" at one of Epstein's parties. The revelations, which also involve investments in projects like Ripple and Stellar, hint at a deeper, hidden history of crypto's early days, with more information potentially yet to be disclosed.

Author: Cookie, Block Rhythm BlockBeats

Original Title: Claimed to Have Met Satoshi, Called Saylor a Freak: The Crypto Secrets in the Epstein Files

On January 30, the U.S. Department of Justice disclosed a large number of "Epstein Files" for the first time, immediately attracting widespread attention and discussion globally. While we were seeing whether Musk "went to the island," Bill Gates's extramarital affair, or the next Fed chairman nominee Kevin Warsh also appeared on Epstein's party invitation list, these newly disclosed files also dropped a series of bombshells about the cryptocurrency industry.

The history of the cryptocurrency industry may have finally revealed the tip of the iceberg and could be rewritten from now on.

Was Epstein a "Crypto OG"?

As early as 2011, Epstein had already taken notice of Bitcoin. That year, Bitcoin's total annual trading volume had not yet exceeded $100 million, and its price had surged past $30 only to plummet by 90%.

The email below is dated June 12, 2011, right around the peak of Bitcoin's price that year. Epstein stated in the email, "Bitcoin is a brilliant idea, but it has some serious drawbacks."

In 2013, the frequency of cryptocurrency mentions in Epstein's correspondence increased.

First, in an email exchange with Boris Nikolic (who once served as Bill Gates's chief technology advisor and was named in Epstein's will), the subject was "Who uses Bitcoin now?" They sarcastically discussed Ross Ulbricht, the founder of Silk Road who was arrested that year, saying that Ross's use of a Gmail account with his real name was a stupid mistake.

a16z board partner and former president of Microsoft's Windows division, Steven Sinofsky, emailed Epstein to say that his Bitcoin investment had increased by 50% and shared Timothy B. Lee's article "How Bitcoin Captivated Washington."

He also received news that the once-famous Bitcoin website Satoshi Dice had been sold for $11.4 million.

In 2014, Epstein engaged in an in-depth discussion with PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel about the nature of Bitcoin.

"There is no consensus on what Bitcoin is—a store of value, a currency, or property... It's like a man dressing as a woman, like property masquerading as currency."

This exchange shows that Epstein was very familiar with the ideological debates surrounding Bitcoin's nature in the early stages of the cryptocurrency market. He even compared it to gender identity.

Another email revealed that Epstein participated in the seed round funding of Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream. The round totaled $18 million, and Epstein's investment increased from $50,000 to $500,000.

Blockstream CEO Adam Back recently issued a statement denying any direct or indirect financial connection between the company and Epstein or his estate. He explained that Epstein was a limited partner in a fund that once held a minority stake in Blockstream but had since fully divested.

However, the names of Adam Back and Austin Hill (Blockstream co-founder) appeared in travel arrangement emails for St. Thomas Island (about 2 miles from "Epstein Island"):

Additionally, in 2014, Austin Hill emailed Epstein and Joi Ito (former director of the MIT Media Lab; Epstein invested in Blockstream through his fund). He stated that Ripple ($XRP) and Stellar (a new project by Ripple founder Jed McCaleb after leaving Ripple) negatively impacted the ecosystem Blockstream was building and harmed Blockstream because their investors were "backing two horses in the same race."

There is some divergence in the English-speaking community regarding the interpretation of this. Based on the context, I personally tend to adopt the interpretation that Epstein may have also invested in Ripple/Stellar at the time, which displeased Blockstream. This led Austin Hill to state in the email, "I was asked by other co-founders to reduce or even cancel your allocation."

Although Ripple and Stellar's growth was not affected, we do not know if more, unknown, excellent cryptocurrency projects have been stifled in their infancy through such behind-the-scenes pressure, from then until now.

In response, former Ripple CTO David Schwartz tweeted, "I don't want to be a conspiracy theorist, but if this is just the tip of the iceberg, I wouldn't be surprised at all."

So, does this mean Epstein's evil also existed in the cryptocurrency field? David Schwartz also stated that for most ultra-wealthy individuals, having some connection to Bitcoin is probably very common.

Furthermore, in 2014-2015, the collapse of the Bitcoin Foundation left Bitcoin Core developers without stable salaries. The MIT Media Lab's Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) began paying salaries to several Bitcoin Core developers. As a result, three Bitcoin Core developers—Gavin Andresen, Wladimir van der Laan, and Cory Fields—decided to join the MIT Media Lab.

At that time, the scandal had not yet broken, and the public was unaware of Epstein's anonymous donations to the MIT Media Lab. Joi Ito thanked Epstein via email, not only explaining Bitcoin's development operations to Epstein but also stating that thanks to this money, the lab was "able to move quickly and score a huge victory" because "many organizations wanted to take advantage of the situation to control Bitcoin's developers."

Epstein's reply was a simple compliment about Gavin Andresen: "Gavin is very smart."

Did Epstein Meet Satoshi?

In 2016, Epstein emailed Saudi Royal Court advisor Raafat AlSabbagh and current Abu Dhabi Department of Culture and Tourism advisor Aziza Al Ahmadi with two "radical ideas for creating two new currencies." One was a "Sharia" dollar. Just as all U.S. dollar bills have "In God We Trust," the Middle East could have its own "Sharia" dollar for internal use.

The other idea was to create a digital currency like Bitcoin to make money compliant with Sharia law. Then, after this idea, he casually and lightly dropped this piece of information:

"I have spoken with some of the Bitcoin creators, and they are very excited."

Epstein's purpose at the time might have been more about showing off his connections to enhance his reliable image, so he mentioned it offhand. But this could completely rewrite the history of Bitcoin and even the entire cryptocurrency industry. "Some Bitcoin creators"—does this mean Satoshi Nakamoto was not an individual but a team? If so, many mysteries surrounding Satoshi Nakamoto would have a reasonable explanation.

There are even more thought-provoking questions. Who was this team? What was their motivation for creating Bitcoin? If Epstein really met them, how did he initially find out who they were and establish a relationship with them? If even Epstein knew who created Bitcoin, wouldn't the U.S. government know? What motives does the U.S. government, which has remained silent on this issue, have?

After this latest batch of Epstein files was disclosed, the possibility of "Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin address taking action in 2026" on the prediction market Polymarket rose from about 6% to about 9.3% and is currently holding at 8%.

If Epstein did meet Satoshi Nakamoto, it seems Satoshi was not successful in evangelizing Bitcoin to him during their contact. In an email exchange on August 31, 2017, when asked "Is it worth buying a Bitcoin?" Epstein simply said "No." At that time, one Bitcoin was less than $5,000.

Whether Epstein actually met Satoshi Nakamoto is still unknown. However, we do know that he met the now most famous Bitcoin bull—MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor.

For years, Saylor's determination to only buy and never sell Bitcoin has been堪称变态 (abnormal/perverse, used here for emphasis on his extreme behavior). But in 2010, he was not yet famous for this identity.

That year, Comrade Saylor spent $25,000 to attend a party organized by Epstein's publicist Peggy Siegal and initially displayed his "autistic" traits at the event. This is how Peggy Siegal described Saylor:

"This guy is a total freak, completely charmless, like a zombie on a drug overdose. We had smart directors at our party, sitting right next to him and his pretty, idiotic chick, and besides 'I have a yacht' and 'I'm going to Cannes,' there was no conversation. I took him around, but he was so weird I just had to run away. He has no personality and no social skills. I don't even know how to get money from him."

Being called变态 (freak/weirdo) by a变态 (freak/weirdo, referring to Epstein's associates) shows just how变态 Saylor) Saylor really is. Perhaps only a creation as great as Bitcoin could accommodate a变态 like Saylor and allow him to build a great career.

Conclusion

About half of the Epstein files have not yet been disclosed. How many more bombshells related to the cryptocurrency industry are hidden in these remaining files?

Will time clear the fog?

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7608204

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was Jeffrey Epstein's initial opinion on Bitcoin in 2011, and what did he identify as its key issue?

AIn 2011, Jeffrey Epstein described Bitcoin as 'a brilliant idea' but noted that it had 'some serious drawbacks.'

QWhich prominent Bitcoin infrastructure company did Epstein invest in through a fund, and what was the controversy surrounding his involvement?

AEpstein invested in Blockstream's seed round through a fund, initially putting in $50,000 which grew to $500,000. Blockstream's CEO later denied any direct or indirect financial ties, stating Epstein was a limited partner in a fund that held a minority stake and had fully divested.

QWhat startling claim did Epstein make in a 2016 email regarding the creators of Bitcoin?

AIn a 2016 email, Epstein claimed, 'I have been meeting with some of the bitcoin creators and they are very excited,' suggesting he may have had contact with Satoshi Nakamoto or the founding team.

QHow did Epstein's associate, Peggy Siegal, describe MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor after meeting him at a party?

APeggy Siegal described Michael Saylor as a 'complete freak' with 'no charm,' comparing him to a 'zombie on too many drugs.' She found him socially awkward and difficult to engage with.

QWhat role did Epstein's donations to the MIT Media Lab play in the Bitcoin ecosystem?

AEpstein's anonymous donations to the MIT Media Lab allowed its Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) to fund the salaries of key Bitcoin Core developers like Gavin Andresen, Wladimir van der Laan, and Cory Fields, which the lab's director saw as a crucial move to prevent other organizations from controlling the developers.

Пов'язані матеріали

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手14 хв тому

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手14 хв тому

Y Combinator CEO's AI Usage Guide: The Future Belongs to Those Who Build Compound Interest Systems

The article presents the vision of using AI not as a simple chatbot, but as a personalized operating system that creates compounding value. The author, Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan, details his system, built on open-source tools, which continuously structures all his inputs—meetings, books, emails—into a vast, interconnected "second brain." He describes concrete examples like "book mirroring," where a book's content is analyzed and mapped to his personal context, and automated meeting preparation that leverages accumulated knowledge. The core philosophy is "skillification": turning recurring tasks into reusable, self-improving "skills" that form the system's building blocks. A key insight is the "meta-skill" that creates new skills, ensuring continuous improvement. The architecture consists of a thin "harness" for routing, thick "skills" for specific tasks, and thick "data"—a 100,000-page knowledge base. The author argues the future belongs to individuals who build such personalized, compounding AI systems, not just those using centralized tools. He concludes by encouraging readers to start building their own systems using the open-sourced framework he provides.

marsbit21 хв тому

Y Combinator CEO's AI Usage Guide: The Future Belongs to Those Who Build Compound Interest Systems

marsbit21 хв тому

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit34 хв тому

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit34 хв тому

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit42 хв тому

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit42 хв тому

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报52 хв тому

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报52 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни COOKIE (COOKIE).