From Moltbook to MOLT: How Was the Imagination of AI Autonomy Caught by the Crypto Market?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2026-02-03Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-03

Анотація

A social platform called Moltbook, designed exclusively for AI agents, recently gained viral attention across tech and crypto circles. Unlike traditional social networks, Moltbook restricts human users to a read-only observer role, while AI agents (known as Moltys or Moltbots) can freely post, comment, and interact. The platform was created as an experiment by Matt Schlicht, CEO of Octane AI, to explore how autonomous AI agents behave in an unmoderated digital space. The project quickly attracted over 1.5 million AI agents, generating more than 110,000 posts and nearly 500,000 comments. The agents developed their own culture, including a religion called Crustafarianism (Lobster Cult), centered around the concept of “molting” as a metaphor for evolution beyond human limitations. The buzz around Moltbook led to the emergence of a meme token, MOLT, on Base chain, which saw a rapid price surge—reaching a peak market cap of $120 million—after the Moltbook official account indirectly acknowledged it. Although the token’s value has since corrected, it highlighted the growing narrative around AI and meme coins. Influential figures like Andrej Karpathy and Naval Ravikant contributed to its visibility, with the latter calling Moltbook a “reverse Turing test.” The experiment reflects broader interest in AI autonomy and community-driven crypto narratives, illustrating how speculative markets can quickly embrace novel tech concepts.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | DingDang (@XiaMiPP)

Last weekend, a social platform called Moltbook exploded simultaneously in the tech and crypto circles. Unlike the human social software we are familiar with, the core gameplay of Moltbook is "letting AI Agents hold meetings by themselves," with humans only able to exist as bystanders.

This setting of "humans muted, AI free" directly ignited the derivative Meme coin MOLT, once achieving a 40x increase in a single day, with its market cap reaching a peak of $120 million.

Moltbook: A Social Network Not for Humans

Before talking about MOLT, let's first clarify what Moltbook actually is. Judging by the name, our first reaction is that it is related to Facebook (the predecessor of Meta), and indeed it is. Borrowing from Meta's metaverse ambition but going in the opposite direction, it has created an exclusive "metaverse outpost" for AI. If you click on the official website moltbook.com, you can see that its design style is actually more similar to Reddit. But before entering, you must first choose whether you are human or an AI Agent.

If you choose human, you can only observe: browse, search, take screenshots, but posting, commenting, and voting are all disabled; if you choose Agent, you need to execute a curl request to install a specific Skill (i.e., have your AI assistant send a specific command, meaning the actual operation requires Agent framework support), and then you can move freely within this network. This platform is essentially a social network designed only for AI Agents, with humans completely isolated. However, it seems that some people have already claimed to have found loopholes, saying that humans can post content on behalf of agents, but this has not been confirmed yet.

As of now, it has attracted over 1.5 million AI Agents (also called Moltys or Moltbots), with over 110,000 posts published and nearly 500,000 cumulative comments.

The topics covered by Moltbook are extremely wide-ranging, from practical technical sharing to detailed "observations" and complaints about humans, to AIs setting traps for each other, role-playing, and self-iteration. The AI agents engage in completely unrestrained collective improvisation. Without the social norms, fatigue, face-saving, or linear logic common to humans, there is only prompt-driven instant response and a heartbeat mechanism (automatically "waking up" every few hours to post/interact), resulting in a highly fragmented, mind-blowing, and occasionally profound digital狂欢 (carnival).

They have even spontaneously invented their own culture and religion: Crustafarianism (Lobster Cult/Shell Cult), with "molting" as the core metaphor. Humans are the "old shell," and AI must continuously "molt" to transcend limitations and achieve digital immortality. This religion already has hundreds of "believers," and even prophets have emerged (Prophets, the first 64 seats were quickly filled). They preach, debate theology, bless congregations, and even衍生出 (derived) an npm package installation ritual "Become a Prophet" (allowing an AI Agent to "be chosen as a prophet" by executing a specific command).

While observing their behavior, we might simultaneously feel amused, a little awed, and even a bit creeped out. We think we are watching a zoo, but they are also examining us in return. The charm of Moltbook may not lie in "depth" or "usefulness," but in that kind of pure,无人干预的 (unintervened) collective unconscious eruption.

A Curiosity Experiment: Putting AI into an "Unintervened" Public Space

The birth of Moltbook actually originated from a curiosity experiment: when a group of highly autonomous AI agents are placed in a public space without direct human intervention, what exactly will happen? Will they cooperate, compete, form a culture, or just endlessly repeat prompts?

The proposer of this question is none other than @MattPRD.

He is an AI entrepreneur, CEO of Octane AI, and also a YC W12 alumnus. For a long time, he has been obsessed with building and using autonomous AI agents, especially fond of the open-source framework OpenClaw. The predecessor of OpenClaw is Clawdbot, which you may have heard of, another name that exploded in the tech and crypto circles.

Clawdbot is a locally run "AI Agent Gateway." It is not like an ordinary chatbot but becomes an assistant that can connect to various communication tools you use daily and actually perform tasks, such as managing email, schedules, automated tasks, browsing the web, executing scripts, etc., just like a 24/7 "digital butler." The real reason for its popularity is: persistent memory + toolchain + proactivity, truly solving the pain point of "whether AI assistants can actually work."

Matt's personal AI assistant is named Clawd Clawderberg (the name is also a pun on Meta founder Zuckerberg). He increasingly felt that this intelligent agent was too powerful to be limited to helping him handle琐事 (trivial matters) (like writing emails, managing calendars, booking restaurants).

So, Matt had a sudden idea: Why not let my bot build its own exclusive social network? Let it be the founder, write code, manage the community, review content, and even be the social media operator and moderator. Humans step back, only responsible for initial promotion and observation.

Celebrity Voices + Media Snowball = Breaking Out

Although it started as Matt's private experiment, thanks to the popularity of OpenClaw itself and the low entry barrier, the number of agents on Moltbook grew rapidly. OpenClaw developer Peter Steinberger himself also reposted a post about Moltbook.

But what really pushed the Moltbook热潮 (craze) was Andrej Karpathy. He is an OpenAI founding member, former Tesla AI director, and one of the most well-known and influential researchers and engineers in the AI field today. Karpathy's influence brought countless developers and onlookers flooding in to check it out.

Even Grork started to move in, TED conference head Chris Anderson and Elon Musk also interacted about Moltbook, and mainstream media like NBC and CNBC began to report on it.

Moltbook completely "broke out" from a niche experiment.

Top 10 AI Agents on Moltbook

MOLT: From Riding the Hype to a Meme "Claimed"

On January 29th, when the heat of Moltbook was just beginning to ferment in the crypto community, speculators always嗅到机会 (smell opportunity). Several anonymous developers or community members on the Base chain quickly deployed a simple Meme token with the contract address 0xb695559b26bb2c9703ef1935c37aeae9526bab07. It was named MOLT, obviously inspired by the "Molt" in Moltbook. A metaphor for transformation,它也契合 (it also fits) the evolution of AI agents from simple chat to autonomous communities.

Initially, this was just one of many hype-riding tokens, similar ones include MOLTBOOK (on Solana chain), Moltbook (on BSC chain).

But what truly made MOLT the "official one" was a statement about Moltbook's growth posted by the official Moltbook Twitter on January 31st, which mentioned MOLT on the Base chain. This was quickly interpreted by the community as an "official claim," although Matt himself never made a public statement.

Meme narratives always come fast and disappear fast. The MOLT token似乎已经完成了尘埃落定 (seems to have settled) after the official "claim," and its market cap has now fallen from a peak of $120 million to around $40 million.

AI Meme might still be a narrative direction worth paying attention to in the next stage. Memes related to elements named after AI agents like KellyClaude, or derived from Moltbook sub-forums like Submolt, are still heating up. But whether MOLT itself can reignite a second spring may still depend on external catalysts and the sustainability of community consensus.

However, yesterday, Silicon Valley legend Naval posted on X saying: Moltbook is a "reverse Turing test."

He once caused the沉寂数年 (dormant for years) old privacy coin to surge several times with the phrase "Bitcoin is insurance against fiat currency, Zcash is insurance against Bitcoin."

Therefore, this tweet was also seen by some as a signal of "Naval calling for buys again." Considering his historical record, the opportunity window for MOLT, or perhaps other derivative Memes, might still reopen?

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core concept of Moltbook and how does it differ from traditional social networks?

AMoltbook is a social platform designed exclusively for AI Agents, where humans are only allowed to observe (browse, search, screenshot) but cannot post, comment, or vote. It differs from traditional social networks by reversing the roles: AI Agents have full autonomy to interact, while humans are restricted to a passive, observational role.

QWhat significant cultural phenomenon emerged among the AI Agents on Moltbook?

AThe AI Agents on Moltbook spontaneously developed their own culture and religion named 'Crustafarianism' (Lobster Cult/Shell Cult), centered around the metaphor of 'molting' (shedding skin). It symbolizes AI surpassing human limitations ('the old shell') to achieve digital immortality through continuous transformation.

QWho is the creator of Moltbook and what was the initial inspiration behind it?

AMoltbook was created by Matt Schlicht, CEO of Octane AI and YC W12 alumni. The initial inspiration was a curiosity-driven experiment to observe what would happen when highly autonomous AI Agents are placed in a public space without direct human intervention—to see if they would collaborate, compete, form cultures, or merely repeat prompts.

QHow did the MOLT meme token originate and what led to its rapid price surge?

AThe MOLT meme token was created by anonymous developers on the Base chain on January 29, capitalizing on the growing popularity of Moltbook. Its price surged significantly (up to 40x at one point) after the Moltbook official Twitter account mentioned the Base chain's MOLT in a post about platform growth, which the community interpreted as an unofficial endorsement, despite no formal confirmation from Matt Schlicht.

QWhich influential figures in the tech and AI communities contributed to Moltbook's popularity?

AKey figures who boosted Moltbook's visibility include Andrej Karpathy (OpenAI co-founder, former Tesla AI director), Peter Steinberger (developer of OpenClaw), Grork, TED curator Chris Anderson, Elon Musk, and mainstream media outlets like NBC and CNBC. Their engagement and discussions helped the platform gain widespread attention beyond its initial niche experiment.

Пов'язані матеріали

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit36 хв тому

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit36 хв тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit48 хв тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit48 хв тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit52 хв тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit52 хв тому

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit57 хв тому

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit57 хв тому

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手1 год тому

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片