From Competing on Experience to Building Assets: Hyperliquid is Moving Ahead of CEXs

比推Опубліковано о 2026-01-28Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-28

Анотація

Amidst a general market stagnation, Hyperliquid ($HYPE) has demonstrated notable independent growth, signaling a shift in the Perp DEX narrative. Rather than competing solely on user experience akin to centralized exchanges (CEXs), Hyperliquid is expanding into synthetic assets—including commodities like crude oil, precious metals, and foreign currencies—through its HIP-3 protocol. This positions it not just as a decentralized exchange, but as a crypto-native, Nasdaq-like platform for global asset trading. The move reflects a broader trend of on-chain liquidity integrating with real-world assets, a direction also being explored by major CEXs like Bitget, OKX, and Bybit. Hyperliquid’s advantages include narrower spreads, faster execution, and 24/7 availability compared to traditional platforms. It leverages on-chain transparency, permissionless listings, and fee redistribution to challenge the opaque, centralized models of CEXs and traditional finance—focusing on code-based trust rather than decentralization rhetoric.

Author: Haotian

Original Title: While CEXs Are Still Competing on Experience, Hyperliquid Is Already Trading Precious Metals and Forex

While mainstream assets remain stagnant, $HYPE's independent bullish surge is indeed thought-provoking. Many are asking why the Perp DEX sector has been quiet lately, but @HyperliquidX's performance has already provided the answer:

1) The narrative ceiling has shifted. The old story of Perp DEXs approaching CEX-level experience is no longer compelling. It seems Hyperliquid is breaking away from the internal competition of being a "user-friendly DEX" and is expanding into a full range of synthetic assets through the HIP-3 protocol.

It is transitioning from the goal of outperforming CEXs as a user-friendly DEX to becoming a chain-based Nasdaq narrative that best serves Crypto Native users. The shift from pure Crypto speculation to seamless trading of crude oil, forex, and precious metals directly elevates the vision;

2) The "reverse flow" of on-chain liquidity into real-world assets. Observing exchanges like Bitget, OKX, and Bybit building platforms around the "asset tokenization" narrative indicates that the growth ceiling for pure Crypto assets has been reached.

Don’t doubt it—when you find that the spread for trading silver on-chain is narrower than on CEXs, the response is faster than brokers, and it operates 24/7 without interruption, it ceases to be just a DEX and transforms into an all-weather global asset routing hub. This is an inevitable outcome of on-chain liquidity beginning to reverse-flow into real-world assets. Whoever takes the lead in championing this will emerge as the winner;

3) A dimensional shift in rule-making. In the past, Perp DEXs were imitating and trying to match the experience of CEXs, but Hyperliquid has clearly elevated the game. The new rule logic includes absolute on-chain transparency, permissionless listing, fee rebate mechanisms, and other emerging market rules.

Ultimately, it uses code-based trust to dismantle the black-box advantages of CEXs and TradFi. Interestingly, decentralization isn’t even mentioned.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original Link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7606559

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main narrative shift that Hyperliquid is undergoing according to the article?

AHyperliquid is shifting from being a 'user-friendly DEX' focused on competing with CEXs in crypto perpetual trading to becoming a 'chain-based Nasdaq' narrative, expanding into synthetic assets like crude oil, foreign exchange, and precious metals to attract broader asset trading.

QHow does Hyperliquid's new strategy represent a 'dimensional reduction attack' on traditional rules?

AHyperliquid uses code-based trust to eliminate the black-box advantages of CEXs and TradFi by offering absolute on-chain transparency, permissionless listing of new assets, and fee rebate mechanisms, rather than merely imitating CEX user experience.

QWhat advantage does Hyperliquid claim over CEXs when trading assets like silver?

AHyperliquid claims to offer narrower price spreads, faster response times than brokers, and 24/7 non-stop trading for assets like silver, making it an all-weather global asset routing hub rather than just a DEX.

QWhy are exchanges like Bitget, OKX, and Bybit moving towards 'asset tokenization' narratives?

AThey recognize the growth bottleneck of pure crypto assets and are exploring asset tokenization to leverage on-chain liquidity to integrate real-world assets, a trend that Hyperliquid is pioneering.

QWhat key feature of Hyperliquid's HIP-3 protocol supports its expansion into synthetic assets?

AHIP-3 protocol enables Hyperliquid to offer permissionless listing and trading of synthetic assets, including commodities and forex, facilitating its transition to a full-chain asset trading platform.

Пов'язані матеріали

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit55 хв тому

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit55 хв тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 год тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 год тому

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist1 год тому

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist1 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 год тому

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси