From a "Preemptive Bet" Trade, Understanding the Hottest Web3 Trend of 2025: Prediction Markets

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-07Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-07

Анотація

In early January 2025, a significant transaction on the decentralized prediction platform Polymarket drew widespread attention. An account invested approximately $32,537 over four days betting that Venezuelan President Maduro would leave office by January 31. The bet was placed hours before related geopolitical news became public, eventually yielding over $400,000 in profit as the event's perceived likelihood surged. This incident highlights the growing influence of prediction markets—a rapidly expanding Web3 sector in 2025. Prediction markets use financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information, allowing participants to trade on event outcomes. Prices reflect collective intelligence, often outperforming traditional polls, as seen during the 2024 U.S. election. Key platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi have attracted over $3.15 billion in funding, with Polymarket’s valuation reaching $8–9 billion after a strategic investment from ICE. The sector is projected to grow from $900 million in trading volume in 2024 to $40 billion in 2025, with users increasing from 4 million to 15 million. Unlike gambling, prediction markets use transparent, market-driven pricing and serve as data products for decision-making, attracting researchers and institutional players. Their growth is fueled by regulatory clarity from the CFTC, expanded event categories, and improved technology. However, risks remain, including potential insider trading and market manipulation. Participation is pro...

I. Introduction

In early January Beijing time, a piece of news circulated on overseas social platforms and within various crypto communities: the U.S. government had taken strong action regarding the situation in Venezuela, drawing significant attention from the international community. Almost simultaneously, a transaction record on a decentralized prediction platform quickly became a major topic of discussion in the market.

Data shows that over a span of just four days starting December 27, 2025, an account on the prediction market platform Polymarket accumulated an investment of approximately $32,537, consistently betting on the event that "Venezuelan President Maduro will step down before January 31." Notably, this account established a large position within a few hours before the related news was widely discussed externally.

At that time, the market's overall pricing for the probability of the related event occurring was not high, around 6%. As the situation evolved and official U.S. statements were released, the value of the account's holdings rapidly increased, ultimately realizing paper profits exceeding $400,000, with a return rate reaching over tenfold at one point.

Whether this trade involved insider information remains subject to further investigation by regulators and the platform. But it is sufficient to raise a question—what exactly is this frequently mentioned Polymarket? And why have prediction markets rapidly gained popularity in 2025?

This article will use this event to systematically introduce this rapidly expanding Web3 sector.

II. What is a Prediction Market? Why Can It "Aggregate Collective Wisdom"

A Prediction Market is essentially a mechanism that uses financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information.

In a prediction market, participants need to use real money to express their views on the outcome of a specific event through trading. As different judgments continuously compete in the market, the price gradually converges to a level that reflects the "collective judgment probability." This mechanism allows prediction markets, in certain scenarios, to come closer to the actual outcome than traditional surveys or subjective judgments.

This advantage was fully demonstrated during the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Prediction market platforms, represented by Polymarket, provided probability judgments on election outcomes at several key junctures that were noticeably ahead of traditional polling agencies. Their predictive accuracy was subsequently validated after the final results were confirmed.

As credibility continues to accumulate, prediction markets are being cited more widely:

  • Mainstream financial media (e.g., Bloomberg) directly reference their odds data in reports;
  • Search engines and AI Q&A products (e.g., Perplexity) display prediction market results as reference information;
  • Prediction markets are gradually transitioning from an "internal tool within the crypto community" to a public source of information.

In terms of market size, industry growth is also significant. Multiple research institutions estimate:

  • The total trading volume of prediction markets in 2025 is expected to grow from approximately $900 million in 2024 to $40 billion;
  • The user base is projected to grow from about 4 million to 15 million people;

At the capital level, prediction markets have also received high recognition. By 2025, the two platforms Polymarket and Kalshi had attracted cumulative funding exceeding $3.15 billion, holding an absolute dominant position in the industry. In October 2025, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, announced a strategic investment in Polymarket, pushing its valuation into the $8-9 billion range. Simultaneously, Kalshi also completed several large funding rounds, with investors including multiple global leading institutions.

Amid these overlapping factors, prediction markets are widely regarded as one of the most representative Web3 sectors of 2025.

III. Prediction Markets ≠ Gambling: The Essential Differences Between the Two Mechanisms

As the popularity of prediction markets rises, a common controversy also emerges: are prediction markets just "gambling in a new shell"?

From an underlying mechanism perspective, the two have fundamental differences.

1. Different Price Formation Mechanisms

Prediction markets adopt a market-based pricing logic. Prices are formed through the博弈 (game/competition) between buyers and sellers in a public order book. All transaction data is auditable. The platform itself does not set probabilities nor bear outcome risks; it only collects transaction fees.

Gambling platforms, however, set odds internally. Their calculation logic is not transparent, and they ensure long-term profitability through the "house edge." The goal of adjusting odds is not to discover the true probability but to control the platform's risk.

2. Functional and Purpose Differences

The prices generated by prediction markets are essentially a data product that can be used externally. They can be applied in scenarios such as macro event judgment, policy expectation analysis, corporate risk management, and can even inversely influence media narratives and decision-making references.

Gambling behavior is primarily for entertainment consumption. Its odds do not possess spillover value nor serve an information discovery function.

3. Differences in Participant Structure

Liquidity in prediction markets comes from information-driven participants, including researchers, macro traders, data analysts, institutional users, etc. Their core goal is to arbitrage and discover prices using information asymmetry.

Liquidity in gambling markets mainly comes from ordinary consumers, who are more easily driven by emotions and preferences, not focusing on information accuracy.

Because of this, prediction markets are often seen as a form of "information liquidity market," rather than traditional entertainment gambling.

IV. Why Did Prediction Markets Explode in Popularity in 2025?

Prediction markets are not a new concept; their theoretical foundations can be traced back to the last century. However, achieving规模化 (scalable) growth truly relied on the maturation of multiple external conditions in 2025.

First, there was a key breakthrough in regulation. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) gradually clarified the compliant positioning of prediction markets, defining them as falling under the category of commodity derivatives, not gambling behavior. This change allowed prediction markets to be distributed through broader channels. Post-compliance, the coverage of prediction markets in the U.S. even surpassed that of some traditional gambling businesses, reaching all 50 states.

Second, there was a restoration of institutional confidence and capital inflow. With clear regulatory boundaries, the financing path for prediction market platforms rapidly widened. Multiple large funding rounds provided support for product experience, liquidity, and risk control systems.

Third, there was an expansion of event categories. Evolving from macro-political events to include economic data, crypto industry events, and even sports events, making the application scenarios of prediction markets more diverse.

Finally, there was technological maturity. On-chain settlement, automated market making, and the application of AI tools in information analysis and trading assistance collectively lowered the barriers to participation and use.

These factors worked together, making 2025 the year prediction markets truly "broke out" into the mainstream.

V. Risks and Boundaries: A Rational View on Prediction Markets

It must be emphasized that prediction markets are not without controversy. The "preemptive positioning" case mentioned at the beginning of the article also reflects that insider information, manipulation prevention, and compliance enforcement remain issues requiring continuous improvement in this field.

It also needs to be clearly stated that Mainland China explicitly prohibits related prediction and disguised gambling activities. Ordinary users should not participate in any activities that do not comply with local laws and regulations.

However, from a research and industry observation perspective, prediction markets, as a tool for information aggregation and probability expression, still hold value worth attention and study in terms of systems, technology, and product design.

For the Web3 industry, it offers a new direction: not merely revolving around "asset speculation," but building data infrastructure around information, decision-making, and real-world events that can be used by real society. This, perhaps, is the real reason prediction markets are widely discussed in 2025.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is a prediction market and how does it aggregate collective intelligence?

AA prediction market is a mechanism that uses financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information. Participants use real money to trade on the outcome of an event, and through market博弈, the price converges to a level that reflects the 'collective judgment probability'. This allows prediction markets to often be closer to the true outcome than traditional surveys or subjective judgments in certain scenarios.

QWhy did prediction markets gain significant popularity in 2025?

APrediction markets gained popularity in 2025 due to multiple factors: key regulatory breakthroughs, such as the CFTC clarifying their legal status as commodity derivatives rather than gambling; restored institutional confidence and capital inflow; expansion of event categories beyond politics to include economic data and sports; and technological成熟, including on-chain settlement and AI tools lowering participation barriers.

QWhat are the fundamental differences between prediction markets and gambling?

APrediction markets and gambling differ in pricing mechanisms (market-driven vs. house-set odds), functionality (prediction markets produce data products for external use like risk management, while gambling is primarily entertainment), and participant structure (information-driven users like researchers vs. emotion-driven consumers). Prediction markets are seen as 'information liquidity markets', not entertainment gambling.

QWhat was the notable transaction involving Polymarket and Venezuela in early 2025, and why was it significant?

AIn early 2025, an account on Polymarket invested $32,537 over four days betting that Venezuela's President Maduro would step down by January 31, just before related news spread. The market probability was around 6% at the time, but the account's position grew to over $400,000 in paper gains as events unfolded. This transaction raised questions about insider information and highlighted prediction markets' ability to capture and monetize early information, though it also underscored risks like manipulation.

QHow has the scale and acceptance of prediction markets evolved by 2025?

ABy 2025, prediction markets saw substantial growth: total trading volume was projected to rise from about $900 million in 2024 to $40 billion, with user numbers increasing from 4 million to 15 million. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi attracted over $3.15 billion in funding, and mainstream adoption grew, with outlets like Bloomberg citing their data and AI tools like Perplexity using them as reference sources, moving from crypto社区 tools to public information providers.

Пов'язані матеріали

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报42 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报42 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 год тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片