For the First Time, the U.S. Government Lifts Ban on Crypto Perpetual Contracts: What Does It Mean for the Market?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-30Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-30

Анотація

On May 29, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued guidance permitting 7*24 trading and clearing for crypto asset derivatives, effectively opening the U.S. market to crypto perpetual contracts for the first time. This move allows U.S. citizens and certain platforms to trade these instruments around the clock. Key beneficiaries include Kalshi, which received approval to list a Bitcoin perpetual contract; Coinbase, now the first CFTC-regulated Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) for U.S. clients; and CME, which will transition its Bitcoin futures and options to 7*24 trading. The CFTC emphasized that this is a tailored approach for crypto assets, requiring platforms to maintain compliance and risk assessments, while noting traditional commodities like agriculture may not be suitable for such hours. Industry leaders like Michael Saylor and Brian Armstrong praised the decision for bringing a major segment of the global crypto market to U.S. users. However, consumer advocacy group Better Markets criticized the CFTC, alleging it overlooked investor risks and acted in the industry's interest rather than the public's. Following the guidance, Kraken announced plans to launch CFTC-regulated perpetual futures in the U.S., signaling a potential surge in derivatives trading activity.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010 )

On May 29, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued guidance on 7*24 trading supervision, emphasizing that, due to their digital infrastructure and global continuous trading features, derivatives related to crypto assets are more suitable for round-the-clock trading and clearing.

This means that the United States, previously considered a "no-go zone for crypto perpetual contracts," has opened its doors for the first time. It adds more fuel to the United States becoming a "crypto hub."

Numerous crypto trading platforms and traditional exchanges have responded promptly, launching corresponding trading gateways.

The CFTC's Biggest Gift to the Crypto Market: Opening the 7*24 Perpetual Market

According to incomplete statistics, in 2025, the trading volume of crypto derivatives perpetual contracts ranged between 60 trillion and 85 trillion US dollars, with the highest single-day trading volume reaching 750 billion US dollars; accounting for approximately 75% to 80% of total crypto trading volume.(Odaily Planet Daily Note:Kalshi postedstating the total trading volume for this market in 2025 exceeded 90 trillion US dollars)

However, for U.S. crypto platforms, regulations have never provided clear rules for this huge cake.

Now, the U.S. CFTC has officially opened this market, which originally had almost 0% share, to U.S. citizens and domestic crypto platforms as well as certain CEM exchanges. Simultaneously, U.S. institutions and individual users can now trade crypto perpetual contracts 7*24 seamlessly, eliminating the previous "time difference."

CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig called this a historic step "to bring the world's most active crypto derivatives into the U.S. regulatory framework." The regulatory move quickly triggered action from leading crypto platforms.

Direct Beneficiaries of the New Policy: Kalshi, Coinbase, CME

On the same day, the U.S. CFTC issued a product certification order to the designated contract market KalshiEX, LLC, approving the listing of BTCPERP, a perpetual contract referencing the Bitcoin spot price, as a futures product for trading. The contract was submitted for approval under CFTC Regulation 40.3 on May 29, 2026. Additionally, Kalshi plans to launch over a dozen other crypto perpetual contracts subsequently.

Furthermore, Coinbase announced it has become the first and currently the only CFTC-regulated Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) in the U.S., providing U.S. clients with access to global crypto derivatives markets, including crypto perpetual contracts and options(connecting to platforms like Deribit, whose Bitcoin options open interest exceeds $31 billion); simultaneously, Coinbase also received approval to allow using client crypto assets/stablecoins as margin (subject to rehypothecation conditions).

Finally, as a traditional exchange, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) is also a direct beneficiary of this policy change. Bitcoin futures and options on its Globex platform transitioned to 7*24 trading starting this Friday, ending the previous fixed weekend closure from Friday to Sunday, allowing institutional clients to hedge spot volatility seamlessly.

However, this does not mean trading volume will suddenly surge – although the "CME gap" formed due to weekend closures disappears, market liquidity remains concentrated mainly in ETF options and offshore perpetual contracts; the open interest scale of IBIT options is significantly higher than the CME crypto options market. Currently, large traders' short positions continue to decline, reducing short-term selling pressure, but clear long-term positioning trends have not yet formed.

The Cautious Stance Behind the CFTC Guidance: Commodity Differentiation and Strengthening Authority

Yesterday, alongside issuing a "No-Action Letter" to Coinbase, the relevant CFTC department specifically emphasized two things:

  1. Traditional commodity derivatives like agricultural products, due to their regional nature and trading structure, may not be suitable for fully 7*24 round-the-clock operation;
  2. Regulated trading platforms, swap execution facilities, derivatives clearing organizations, and futures commission merchants must comply with the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and relevant regulatory rules when expanding round-the-clock trading, and proactively assess risk management and operational arrangements.

In other words, 7*24 perpetual trading for commodities like agricultural products is currently not permitted; and any institution wishing to offer 7*24 trading for derivatives must communicate with CFTC staff in advance, submit detailed plans and risk analyses, with the CFTC reviewing compliance on a case-by-case basis.

Thus, it can be seen that the CFTC's move is more like a "special case treatment" for crypto assets, opening a gateway for more crypto platforms to launch derivatives sections and further strengthening its regulatory authority over crypto asset derivatives.

Industry Insider Comments: Overwhelming Praise and Support

The CFTC's regulatory guidance represents the true localization of round-the-clock trading for crypto derivatives in the U.S. market. Liquidity from many domestic users previously excluded from the U.S. market is expected to flow back rapidly, further increasing participation from domestic institutions, capital efficiency, and to some extent reducing risk management costs (rollover costs, weekend time gaps).

Strategy founder Michael Saylor posted, stating the CFTC guidance advances Bitcoin capital markets, including round-the-clock trading, BTC collateral, perpetual futures, options, and regulated access. This will benefit BTC holders, support MSTR's development, and support STRC as Bitcoin-backed digital credit development.

Coinbase CEO Brian Amstrong cheered: "U.S. users have been excluded from this 80% segment of the global crypto market (including perpetual futures and options). But not anymore!"

Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour stated, "This marks Kalshi's evolution from a prediction market leader to a next-generation derivatives exchange. U.S.-based, secure, and regulated perpetual contracts will improve capital allocation and risk management for countless U.S. businesses."

Such statements from beneficiaries are understandable. Some outsiders interpret it as "opening Pandora's box of speculation."

U.S. Public Interest Third-Party Organization: CFTC Ignores Public Interest and Investor Protection

Better Markets, a third-party consumer protection organization established after the 2008 financial crisis, officially stated, "Retail investors are unlikely to fully understand the risks posed by perpetual futures. We urged the CFTC last year to require enhanced disclosures that are easier for retail investors to understand. Unfortunately, the CFTC not only failed to require such enhanced disclosures but also seemed to completely ignore the risks of the products it approved."

"The CFTC's action lacks the decorum expected of a regulator. However, considering Coinbase and Kalshi serve as advisory bodies on two of the CFTC's advisory committees, this is not surprising. It's clear the CFTC's work is not for the public interest or protecting investors, but for the very industries it is supposed to regulate."

The wording directly implies the U.S. CFTC might have interests involved or some level of internal cooperation with Coinbase and Kalshi.

The U.S. Market to Enter a Period of Derivatives Trading Explosion

Apart from the direct beneficiaries mentioned above, U.S. crypto exchange Kraken also stated it plans to launch the first CFTC-regulated perpetual futures product for the U.S. market within the next 30 days. Currently, perpetual futures on Kraken Pro are provided by NinjaTrader Clearing, LLC (operating as Kraken Derivatives US), a CFTC-registered Futures Commission Merchant; related spot margin and perpetual futures products will be offered on Bitnomial Exchange(Odaily Planet Daily Note: the latter is a CFTC-regulated exchange recently acquired by Kraken's parent company Payward).

Setting aside polarized opinions, the gate to the multi-trillion-dollar perpetual derivatives market is slowly opening for U.S. users.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main implication of the CFTC's new guidance for crypto derivatives in the United States?

AThe main implication is the formal opening of the U.S. market for 24/7 trading of crypto perpetual contracts, which were previously largely inaccessible to U.S. citizens and regulated platforms. This allows U.S. individuals and institutions to trade crypto derivatives like perpetual swaps around the clock, eliminating previous time gaps like the "CME gap."

QWhich specific companies are mentioned as direct beneficiaries of the CFTC's new policy?

AThe article names three direct beneficiaries: Kalshi (specifically KalshiEX, LLC), Coinbase, and CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange). Kalshi received approval to list a Bitcoin perpetual contract, Coinbase became the first CFTC-regulated FCM to offer U.S. clients access to global crypto derivatives, and CME will transition its Bitcoin futures and options to 24/7 trading on its Globex platform.

QAccording to the CFTC's statement, why are crypto assets deemed more suitable for 24/7 trading compared to traditional commodities like agricultural products?

AAccording to the CFTC, crypto assets are more suitable for 24/7 trading and clearing due to their digital infrastructure and global, continuous trading nature. In contrast, traditional commodity derivatives like agricultural products may not be suitable for fully continuous operation because of their regional characteristics and specific trading structures.

QWhat criticism does the consumer protection group Better Markets raise against the CFTC's decision?

ABetter Markets criticizes the CFTC for allegedly ignoring public interest and investor protection. They argue that retail investors are unlikely to fully understand the risks of perpetual futures, and they accuse the CFTC of failing to require enhanced, easily understandable disclosures. They also suggest potential undue industry influence, pointing out that Coinbase and Kalshi serve on CFTC advisory committees.

QWhat significant change is Kraken planning following the CFTC's new regulatory stance?

AFollowing the CFTC's guidance, Kraken announced plans to launch its first CFTC-regulated perpetual futures product for the U.S. market within the next 30 days. This offering will be facilitated through its partnership with the CFTC-registered futures commission merchant NinjaTrader Clearing, LLC (operating as Kraken Derivatives US) and the recently acquired, CFTC-regulated Bitnomial Exchange.

Пов'язані матеріали

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit6 хв тому

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit6 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit22 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit22 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片