Florida Passes First State-Level Stablecoin Bill — Crypto CLARITY Act Next?

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-03-08Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-08

Анотація

In a significant move for the crypto industry, the Florida State Senate has passed Senate Bill 314 (SB314), establishing the first state-level regulatory framework for stablecoins in the U.S. The bill, which has also passed the House and is expected to be signed by Governor Ron DeSantis, aims to regulate payment stablecoin issuers by aligning with federal guidelines, including consumer protections and financial stability rules. It revises existing money laundering controls to include stablecoins, requires issuers to be licensed, and clarifies that certain stablecoins are not securities. This development occurs as broader federal crypto legislation continues to face challenges.

In a positive development for the crypto industry, the Florida State Senate has passed a bill to create a regulatory framework for stablecoins at the state level. This move comes amid the struggles to enact a broader crypto market structure bill in the United States.

Florida Creates Stablecoin Framework With New Bill

In a Friday, March 7 post on X, Samuel Armes, founder of the Florida Blockchain Business Association web3 advocacy group, announced that a bill establishing a regulatory framework for stablecoins has passed the state legislature. According to the vocal crypto advocate, this bill, named the “Senate Bill 314 (SB314),” will be signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis over the coming weeks.

Senate Bill 314, along with Florida House Bill 175, aims to establish a regulatory framework for payment stablecoin issuers in the state. According to Republican Florida State Senator Colleen Burton, this regulatory framework, which aligns with the federal-level GENIUS Act, will include consumer protections and financial stability guidelines.

Specifically, the SB314 bill revises the Florida Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Business Act to include stablecoin, while requiring issuers to comply with existing rules and prohibiting unlicensed issuance in the state. The bill also clarified that specific payment stablecoins are not securities and, hence, are not subject to certain provisions.

The Senate Bill 314’s overview read:

[This bill] specifies that office remains solely responsible for supervising qualified payment stablecoin issuers or is jointly responsible with Office of Comptroller of Currency for such supervision; prohibits trust company from engaging in activity of qualified payment stablecoin issuer unless trust company obtains certificate of approval or is exempted from such certificate.

Banks Need To Make A ‘Good Deal’ With The Crypto Industry: Trump

The price of BTC on the daily timeframe | Source: BTCUSDT chart on TradingView

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the name of the bill passed by the Florida State Senate to create a regulatory framework for stablecoins?

AThe bill is named Senate Bill 314 (SB314).

QWho is the founder of the Florida Blockchain Business Association that announced the bill's passage?

ASamuel Armes, the founder of the Florida Blockchain Business Association, announced the bill's passage.

QAccording to the bill, are specific payment stablecoins considered securities?

ANo, the bill clarifies that specific payment stablecoins are not securities and are therefore not subject to certain provisions.

QWhich federal-level act does Florida's new stablecoin regulatory framework align with?

AThe regulatory framework aligns with the federal-level GENIUS Act.

QWhat does the bill prohibit for trust companies regarding stablecoin issuance?

AThe bill prohibits a trust company from engaging in the activity of a qualified payment stablecoin issuer unless it obtains a certificate of approval or is exempted from such a certificate.

Пов'язані матеріали

Storage Giants Are Raking It In, Downstream Players Are Struggling to Cope

Global memory storage giants have reported record-breaking earnings, with downstream clients now struggling to bear the soaring costs. SK Hynix's Q2 operating profit surged 557%, while Samsung's DS division hit a historic high. Chinese firms like GigaDevice and Jiangbolong also saw profits skyrocket. However, this profit surge for memory makers translates directly into higher costs for their customers. The boom is largely driven by AI server demand, which consumes high-bandwidth memory (HBM) at the expense of traditional DRAM supply. While cloud providers may accept higher prices, the strain is breaking downstream sectors. In smartphones, memory now comprises over 20% of device costs, even surpassing the main chip in flagship models. This has led manufacturers like OPPO and vivo to reportedly reject further price hikes from suppliers like Samsung. The PC and consumer electronics segments are also weakening, with spot market prices already falling sharply. The industry faces a turning point. Long-term supply agreements are locking in high prices but also capping further increases. As downstream clients from phones to servers push back against unsustainable costs, the memory super-cycle may be approaching a sudden end, driven not by supply shifts but by collapsing demand.

marsbit8 хв тому

Storage Giants Are Raking It In, Downstream Players Are Struggling to Cope

marsbit8 хв тому

BIT Research: Two Major Bearish Factors Continue to Weigh on the Market, Why is Bitcoin Still Near the Cycle Bottom?

Market remains under pressure from a hawkish Federal Reserve and fading regulatory optimism, yet Bitcoin demonstrates resilience near cycle lows. Despite Chairman Kevin Walsh's firm stance keeping Treasury yields elevated and the probability of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 dropping to 32%, Bitcoin has held within a $62,000-$66,000 range, declining only ~3% over the past week amid these headwinds. Overall market conditions are weak: trading volume is down ~80% from its peak, total market cap has fallen ~50%, and stablecoin supply shows no growth, indicating a lack of fresh dollar liquidity. However, Bitcoin's relative strength versus altcoins suggests significant repositioning may be complete, reducing the likelihood of a sharp further decline. The focus is shifting to whether the cycle bottom is forming. A sustained move above $70,000 could signal the low is in.

marsbit13 хв тому

BIT Research: Two Major Bearish Factors Continue to Weigh on the Market, Why is Bitcoin Still Near the Cycle Bottom?

marsbit13 хв тому

BIS Project Agorá settles $1 million in tokenized cross-border payment trials

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has announced the completion of initial real-value trials for Project Agorá, a tokenized cross-border payment system. The trials involved 28 central and commercial banks settling approximately $1 million (800,000 Swiss francs) across 17 different transaction scenarios. The system successfully used tokenized central bank reserves and commercial bank deposits to process payments in six major currencies, with average settlement times of around 80 seconds. Participants included major central banks such as the Bank of England and Bank of Japan, alongside global commercial institutions like JPMorgan Chase and Citi. Launched in 2024, Project Agorá aims to explore how tokenization can improve wholesale cross-border payments, with this phase marking a key milestone. The BIS confirmed testing will continue as the project develops.

cointelegraph24 хв тому

BIS Project Agorá settles $1 million in tokenized cross-border payment trials

cointelegraph24 хв тому

Critical Day in the Cryptocurrency Market: Sharp 10.5 Billion Dollar Surge in Bitcoin and Ethereum Option Prices! What Do Investors Expect?

Critical Day in Crypto Market: A massive $10.5 billion in Bitcoin and Ethereum options are expiring, shifting investor focus amidst Bitcoin's struggle near $64,000. Data from Deribit shows approximately $9.69B in Bitcoin options and $830M in Ethereum options set to expire. The put/call ratios are 0.28 for BTC and 0.63 for ETH, indicating overall bullish sentiment, though investors appear more cautious on Ethereum. Analysts note that while these expiries are significant, macroeconomic events and broader market sentiment remain key pricing drivers.

cryptonews.ru38 хв тому

Critical Day in the Cryptocurrency Market: Sharp 10.5 Billion Dollar Surge in Bitcoin and Ethereum Option Prices! What Do Investors Expect?

cryptonews.ru38 хв тому

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit48 хв тому

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit48 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片