Fairshake Raises $193 Million as Crypto Firms Prepare for 2026 Midterm Elections

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-29Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-29

Анотація

Fairshake, the largest crypto-backed political action committee (PAC), has raised $193 million in preparation for the 2026 U.S. midterm elections. Major contributors include Ripple, Andreessen Horowitz, and Coinbase. The group supports candidates based on their stance toward cryptocurrency, aiming to influence lawmakers to back clear crypto regulations. It operates through affiliated groups supporting both Democrats and Republicans who are crypto-friendly. Key legislative priorities include the stalled Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which defines regulatory roles and rules for crypto companies. Fairshake is mobilizing early to prevent further delays in crypto legislation, particularly if Democrats gain congressional control, and to protect the industry from becoming a political target. The effort underscores crypto’s growing influence in U.S. politics.

Fairshake, the largest political action committee (PAC) backed by the crypto companies, has build $183 million fund ahead of the 2026 U.S. midterm elections. The crypto industries are once again stepping into U.S. politics. This move shows that crypto has become a permanent force in the U.S. election strategy.

Fairshake’s funding comes from the strong, powerful players in the crypto industry, like Ripple with $25 million, Andreessen Horowitz with $24 million, and Coinbase with $25 million. Nearly $200 million already raised, and Fairshake is closely matching what it spent during the last election cycle.

Fairshake’s Political Stand

Fairshakes basically support the political candidate based on their views on crypto. Its goal is to make the lawmakers who support clear crypto rules and those who don’t. It operates through two major affiliated groups, one which supports the Democrats, friendly to crypto, and the other which supports republicans friendly to crypto. Together, they form a permanent political operation to influence future crypto laws in Congress.

The Republicans have passed one major crypto-related law GENIUS Act. This law established the first U.S. federal framework for stablecoins payment in the U.S. and was supported by both parties. However, the progress has largely stalled beyond that.

The most important unresolved issue is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. The bill clearly explains which government agencies regulate crypto and how exchanges should be treated. It also explains what rules the crypto companies must follow. The bill has been delayed due to political disagreements and even disagreements within the crypto industry.

Why Fairshake is preparing early

If democrats takes the control of the congress, then there will be more delays in passing major crypto laws. Stricter rules focused on consumer protection and crypto regulation took a back seat to other political issues. This is the reason why Fairshake is preparing early and raising large amounts of money now.

Fairshake’s main goal is not just winning elections; it’s about making sure crypto does not become an easy target during political fights. Without clarity, companies remain vulnerable to sudden enforcement actions and policy changes. So this move from the Firshake shows that the crypto is now deeply embedded in U.S. politics.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Coinbase Expands Prediction Markets to All 50 U.S. States

TagsClarity ACTCryptoGenius ACT

Пов'язані питання

QHow much money has Fairshake raised for the 2026 midterm elections, and which companies are the major contributors?

AFairshake has raised $183 million for the 2026 midterm elections. Major contributors include Ripple with $25 million, Andreessen Horowitz with $24 million, and Coinbase with $25 million.

QWhat is the primary goal of Fairshake's political action committee?

AFairshake's primary goal is to support political candidates based on their views on cryptocurrency, aiming to elect lawmakers who support clear crypto regulations and oppose those who do not, ensuring crypto is not an easy target in political fights.

QWhat are the two major crypto-related legislative acts mentioned in the article, and what is their status?

AThe two major crypto-related acts are the GENIUS Act, which established the first U.S. federal framework for stablecoins and was passed with bipartisan support, and the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which defines regulatory agencies and rules for crypto exchanges but has been delayed due to political and industry disagreements.

QWhy is Fairshake preparing early for the 2026 elections, according to the article?

AFairshake is preparing early because if Democrats take control of Congress, there may be more delays in passing major crypto laws, with stricter consumer protection rules taking a back seat to other political issues, making early fundraising crucial to influence future crypto legislation.

QHow does Fairshake operate to influence crypto laws in Congress?

AFairshake operates through two major affiliated groups: one supporting Democrats friendly to crypto and another supporting Republicans friendly to crypto, forming a permanent political operation to influence future crypto laws in Congress.

Пов'язані матеріали

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit7 хв тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit7 хв тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit20 хв тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit20 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片