Exchange 'Listing Curse' Investigation: Why 89% of New Tokens Ultimately Become Retail Investor Traps?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-26Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-26

Анотація

A 2025 analysis reveals a stark reality: 89% of new tokens listed on Binance ended the year with negative returns, debunking the myth that an exchange listing guarantees profits. These tokens experienced an average price decline of 71-80%, often through a slow, steady bleed rather than a sudden crash. Listings are now widely seen as liquidity events for insiders and early investors to exit, earning the term "retail exit liquidity." Key factors driving this trend include excessive selling pressure from teams and airdrop hunters, overinflated valuations with minimal real users, weak capital flows into new altcoins, a market saturated with over 11 million new tokens in 2025, and a focus on narrative over actual product development. Projects in trend-driven sectors like Memes and RWA were particularly vulnerable due to lacking substance. Binance has also become less tolerant of underperformers, delisting tokens like A2Z, FORTH, and HOOK. The report concludes that only projects with genuine products and strong communities can survive long-term, as a Binance listing is no longer a shortcut to success but a test of sustainability.

Author: Gilmo

Compilation: Yuliya, PANews

Why have many tokens listed on Binance failed?

Recently, while browsing X or cryptocurrency communities, you might be familiar with the phenomenon of "listing on an exchange and then crashing." The days when a Binance listing meant "skyrocketing" seem to be a thing of the past. Instead, a "listing curse" has spread within the community, with many investors watching their account funds evaporate day by day, heartbroken.

So, what exactly is happening behind the scenes?

I. Overview

2025 revealed a harsh reality. Most tokens listed on Binance Spot struggled to maintain their value.

89% of tokens listed on Binance in 2025 had negative returns.

+ Price Performance

Approximately 89% to 94% of listed tokens are in severe loss. The average drawdown after listing ranges from 71% to 80%. Many tokens did not experience a sharp crash but rather a slow decline pattern, with prices gradually falling over time, quietly draining funds.

+ Reputation

A Binance listing was once a significant milestone. Now, it is often seen as a liquidity event for early investors to take profits. Due to the massive selling pressure after listing, many traders even refer to it as the "retail exit zone."

+ Attention Cycle

Most projects gain extremely high attention in the first few days. But after that, interest quickly declines. Without real products or user demand, this momentum soon fades.

+ Operations

Some projects slow down their development after reaching the listing. Subsequently, weak activity and low liquidity lead to their delisting from exchanges.

For example: A2Z, FORTH, HOOK, IDEX, LRC, NTRN, RDNT, SXP

In early 2026: ACA, CHESS, DATA were also delisted

Clearly, Binance no longer supports underperforming projects.

II. Listing Categories

In 2025, Binance listed 87 projects, covering 16 sectors.

+ Networks

Ethereum dominated with about 36%, followed by BNB Chain and Solana.

Notably, Binance has started supporting extremely nascent ecosystems like Nillion and 0G Labs, but due to the lack of real users, this is also a high-risk group.

+ Sectors

DeFi led with 18 projects, followed by AI and Infrastructure.

Trend-driven sectors like Memes and RWA can quickly gain listing opportunities, but due to the lack of core products, their failure rates are higher.

III. So Why Do These Tokens Fail?

Several key factors explain this pattern.

1. Liquidity Events for Insiders

Listings create deep liquidity. This allows teams and early investors to realize profits. Airdrop hunters also add selling pressure immediately after listing.

2. Overvaluation

Some projects launched with valuations in the billions but had small user bases. The gap between valuation and actual usage puts heavy pressure on prices.

3. Weak Market Capital Flows

During 2025, capital was largely concentrated around BTC and ETH. New altcoins received limited and short-lived capital.

4. Emphasis on Narrative Over Product

Many teams invested heavily in storytelling and marketing. Actual product development progressed slowly. Once the initial hype faded, user interest plummeted.

5. Market Saturation

Over 11 million tokens were launched in 2025. Supply increased rapidly, while user attention remained limited. Listing alone no longer drives sustainable growth.

IV. Conclusion

From 2025 to 2026, token listings on Binance will more resemble a final round for project insiders to dump their holdings rather than an opportunity for retail investors to get rich.

Only projects with real products and strong communities have a chance to survive.

You can refer to @defikadic's list to understand which are the truly quality projects:

Пов'язані питання

QWhat percentage of tokens listed on Binance in 2025 had a negative return?

AApproximately 89% of tokens listed on Binance in 2025 had a negative return.

QWhat is the average price drawdown for tokens after being listed on Binance?

AThe average price drawdown after listing ranges between 71% and 80%.

QWhich blockchain network dominated the token listings on Binance in 2025?

AEthereum dominated the token listings, accounting for approximately 36% of the projects.

QWhat are the main reasons cited for the failure of newly listed tokens?

AThe main reasons include liquidity events for insiders, overvaluation, weak market capital flows, prioritizing narrative over product, and market saturation.

QWhich sector had the most token listings on Binance in 2025?

AThe DeFi sector had the most token listings with 18 projects, followed by AI and Infrastructure.

Пов'язані матеріали

How to Regulate Single-Stock Leveraged ETFs? On Thursday, the Entire Market Is Watching This Korean Government Meeting

The highest-level economic coordination body in South Korea, the "F4" comprising the Ministry of Economy and Finance, the Financial Services Commission, the Bank of Korea, and the Financial Supervisory Service, will hold an emergency meeting on Thursday to discuss regulatory measures for single-stock leveraged ETFs. These products, launched just six weeks ago, have been widely blamed for exacerbating market volatility. The KOSPI's 8% plunge on Monday triggered the year's seventh trading halt, intensifying scrutiny. Regulators have expressed rare public regret over approving the products. FSS Governor Lee Bok-hyun stated he "regretted not doing everything possible to prevent" their introduction and acknowledged structural problems, citing massive retail investments and legal complications from a rushed rollout. Possible countermeasures under discussion include raising margin requirements, imposing daily price limits, and adjusting leverage caps. However, officials admit these may be temporary fixes. Data confirms the amplified volatility. Since the ETFs' launch, days with KOSPI moves exceeding 3% have nearly doubled. Trading halts have reached record levels, surpassing the 2008 financial crisis peak. The products allow 2x leveraged bets on giants like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. Their daily rebalancing to match returns is seen as mechanically fueling market swings. The outcome of Thursday's F4 meeting is highly anticipated, with expectations leaning towards stricter controls on leverage, investor access, or other structural constraints to curb the products' market impact.

marsbit9 хв тому

How to Regulate Single-Stock Leveraged ETFs? On Thursday, the Entire Market Is Watching This Korean Government Meeting

marsbit9 хв тому

AI Overhauled Terence Tao's 30-Year-Old Website, Uncovering Two Bugs Hidden for Over Two Decades in the Process

AI Revamps Terence Tao's 30-Year-Old Website, Unearthing Two 20-Year-Old Bugs in His Code Terence Tao, a renowned mathematician, has enlisted an AI agent to overhaul his personal academic website, which was built in 1997 with a static HTML, manually-maintained "Web 1.0" architecture. In just one day, the agent migrated 560 papers and preprints, 374 travel logs, 68 courses, 19 books, and 29 old math applets to a new system on GitHub Pages. The new site is structured around YAML files as the "single source of truth," with static HTML pages automatically generated from this data—a fundamental shift from maintaining individual documents to managing a centralized database. During the migration, the AI uncovered inconsistencies, outdated entries, and broken links that had accumulated over nearly three decades of manual updates. It also successfully ported a set of small educational Java 1.0 applets to JavaScript. Notably, while reviewing this translation, Tao found only one new bug introduced by the AI. Conversely, the AI identified two subtle bugs in his original Java code that he was previously unaware of. Tao emphasizes the project highlights AI's potential for automating tedious "digital housekeeping"—routine tasks like data migration and website maintenance that are costly and error-prone when done manually. He also revived a 27-year-old stalled project: a special relativity visualizer or "Minkowskian Inkscape." With AI assistance, a working alpha version was built in two hours. While AI still requires human oversight for critical work, Tao argues that for such structured, non-core tasks, "AI + human review" can result in lower error rates and drastically lower correction costs compared to purely manual maintenance over decades.

marsbit10 хв тому

AI Overhauled Terence Tao's 30-Year-Old Website, Uncovering Two Bugs Hidden for Over Two Decades in the Process

marsbit10 хв тому

ZORA Plunges 95%, Coinbase Finally Admits Creator Coins Failed

On July 13th, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong publicly declared the failure of Base network's year-long "content coins" strategy. Initially launched in 2025 via the Zora platform and integrated into Coinbase's wallet as a core feature, the model aimed to turn every social media post into a tradeable token. Each post or creator account would generate 1 billion ERC-20 tokens, with creators receiving an initial allocation. The concept briefly propelled Base to become the largest L2 by new token issuance. However, the model proved unsustainable. These tokens, explicitly not granting ownership or revenue shares, primarily functioned as speculative assets dependent on new buyers. While activity surged in mid-2025—with millions of tokens minted and billions in trading volume—it failed to build lasting user engagement or value. High-profile token launches, including one by Base's official account, experienced extreme volatility, often crashing shortly after spikes. The supporting infrastructure token, ZORA, plummeted approximately 95% from its August 2025 peak, losing nearly $520 million in market capitalization. Armstrong acknowledged the misstep, stating "it didn't work" and that Base had shifted focus earlier in the year toward its core competencies of trading and stablecoin payments. This pivot follows internal criticism that the content coin experiment consumed excessive resources, harmed other Base projects, and ultimately resulted in significant financial losses for participating users.

Foresight News26 хв тому

ZORA Plunges 95%, Coinbase Finally Admits Creator Coins Failed

Foresight News26 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片