European Banks Launch Qivalis to Issue Euro-Pegged Stablecoin

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-24Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-24

The association of 10 European banks has made a firm known as Qivalis to roll out a euro-pegged stablecoin, as per an announcement from the group. This step focuses on offering an alternative to U.S. dollar-denominated digital payment systems.

The participating banks comprise BNP Paribas, ING, UniCredit, Banca Sella, KBC, DekaBank, Danske Bank, SEB, Caixabank and Raiffeisen Bank International. BNP Paribas joined forces with the consortium after the original announcement, as per the group.

It is anticipated that the token will roll out in the second half of this year, pending regulatory approval and licensing, as per the consortium. An ex-CEO of Coinbase Germany, Jan-Oliver Sell, will act as chief executive of Qivalis, and Howard Davis, ex-chair of NatWest, got appointed as chair.

The Plans For Broadening

The company has planned to hire 45 to 50 employees in the upcoming two years, having 1/3rd of the positions filled so far, as per the company. In the beginning, the stablecoin will aim for cryptocurrency trading, providing near-instant, low-cost payments and settlements, and will have plans to widen use cases later, as per the consortium.

This step is followed by a quick surge, mainly in U.S. dollar-backed tokens like Tether. Euro-pegged alternatives are not unlimited in the market. Societe Generale’s SG-FORGE has 64 million euros in circulation in recent times, as per the available data.

Regulators such as the European Central Bank have elevated concerns that private stablecoins could redirect funds from regulated banking institutions and impact monetary policy.

Qivalis is looking for an Electronic Money Institution licence from the Dutch central bank and has worked with the ECB, which further supported a European-led solution to ensure strategic autonomy in payments, as per the sources close to the discussions.

Another group of banks in Europe and the US is also looking for stablecoin issuance, showing surged institutional interest in digital currencies, as per the industry reports.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Expects Crypto Market to Reach New High in 2026

TagsEuroEuropean central bankStablecoin

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the name of the new firm established by the 10 European banks to issue a euro-pegged stablecoin?

AQivalis

QWhich major French bank joined the consortium after the original announcement?

ABNP Paribas

QWho has been appointed as the chief executive of Qivalis?

AJan-Oliver Sell, the ex-CEO of Coinbase Germany

QWhat type of license is Qivalis seeking from the Dutch central bank?

AAn Electronic Money Institution licence

QWhat is one of the primary initial use cases planned for the new stablecoin?

ACryptocurrency trading, providing near-instant, low-cost payments and settlements

Пов'язані матеріали

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit58 хв тому

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit58 хв тому

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手58 хв тому

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手58 хв тому

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2 год тому

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片