European Banks Launch Qivalis to Issue Euro-Pegged Stablecoin

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-24Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-24

The association of 10 European banks has made a firm known as Qivalis to roll out a euro-pegged stablecoin, as per an announcement from the group. This step focuses on offering an alternative to U.S. dollar-denominated digital payment systems.

The participating banks comprise BNP Paribas, ING, UniCredit, Banca Sella, KBC, DekaBank, Danske Bank, SEB, Caixabank and Raiffeisen Bank International. BNP Paribas joined forces with the consortium after the original announcement, as per the group.

It is anticipated that the token will roll out in the second half of this year, pending regulatory approval and licensing, as per the consortium. An ex-CEO of Coinbase Germany, Jan-Oliver Sell, will act as chief executive of Qivalis, and Howard Davis, ex-chair of NatWest, got appointed as chair.

The Plans For Broadening

The company has planned to hire 45 to 50 employees in the upcoming two years, having 1/3rd of the positions filled so far, as per the company. In the beginning, the stablecoin will aim for cryptocurrency trading, providing near-instant, low-cost payments and settlements, and will have plans to widen use cases later, as per the consortium.

This step is followed by a quick surge, mainly in U.S. dollar-backed tokens like Tether. Euro-pegged alternatives are not unlimited in the market. Societe Generale’s SG-FORGE has 64 million euros in circulation in recent times, as per the available data.

Regulators such as the European Central Bank have elevated concerns that private stablecoins could redirect funds from regulated banking institutions and impact monetary policy.

Qivalis is looking for an Electronic Money Institution licence from the Dutch central bank and has worked with the ECB, which further supported a European-led solution to ensure strategic autonomy in payments, as per the sources close to the discussions.

Another group of banks in Europe and the US is also looking for stablecoin issuance, showing surged institutional interest in digital currencies, as per the industry reports.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Expects Crypto Market to Reach New High in 2026

TagsEuroEuropean central bankStablecoin

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the name of the new firm established by the 10 European banks to issue a euro-pegged stablecoin?

AQivalis

QWhich major French bank joined the consortium after the original announcement?

ABNP Paribas

QWho has been appointed as the chief executive of Qivalis?

AJan-Oliver Sell, the ex-CEO of Coinbase Germany

QWhat type of license is Qivalis seeking from the Dutch central bank?

AAn Electronic Money Institution licence

QWhat is one of the primary initial use cases planned for the new stablecoin?

ACryptocurrency trading, providing near-instant, low-cost payments and settlements

Пов'язані матеріали

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

**From Survival to Accelerated Growth: Zcash Founder Details the 3-Year Rise** Three years ago, Zcash (ZEC) was a struggling pioneer in privacy technology, with a price near $30, low shielded supply (11%), and a community mired in governance disputes. Today, ZEC trades around $600, with over 31% of its supply (~$3B) in user-controlled shielded pools. This transformation resulted from breaking key constraints. First, **governance shackles were removed**. The old model guaranteed funding to two entities (ECC and ZF) regardless of performance, creating a monopoly. In 2024, ECC rejected further direct funding, forcing a change. The NU6 upgrade ended direct funding, allocating 8% to community grants and 12% to a protocol-controlled treasury for retroactive rewards, expiring in 2028 unless renewed by overwhelming consensus. The entities also relinquished their trademark-based veto power, freeing community governance. Second, the **product focus shifted** from pure cryptography to user growth. Previously, engineering excelled at privacy tech but failed to attract users. In early 2024, the team (later ZODL) pivoted to building products users wanted, like the Zodl wallet (default privacy, hardware support, cross-asset swaps). This drove shielded supply to grow over 400% in ZEC terms, with 86.5% of recent transactions being shielded, representing real user adoption. Third, the **narrative evolved** from the limiting "privacy coin" label to "unstoppable private money." This clarified Zcash's value proposition: a Bitcoin-like monetary policy with verifiable private payments via advanced cryptography. This structural narrative—protocol (Zcash), asset (ZEC), gateway (Zodl)—enabled broader exchange listings, institutional interest, and ETF filings. Finally, **organizational constraints were broken**. In early 2026, the ECC team left its non-profit structure after disputes over control, forming Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL). ZODL raised $25M from top VCs (Paradigm, a16z, etc.), gaining the capital and agility of a startup to scale consumer products. Current metrics show strong momentum: social discussion volume for ZEC surged 15,245% in a year, with 81% positive sentiment. The focus is now on enhancing user experience (Zodl wallet), scalability (Tachyon project targeting Visa-level throughput with 25-second blocks), and post-quantum security (quantum-recoverable wallets coming soon). Zcash is positioned to become faster, more usable, scalable, and quantum-resistant.

marsbit4 хв тому

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

marsbit4 хв тому

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbit21 хв тому

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbit21 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片