Europe to Introduce New Prohibitions for Russians in Cryptobusiness. What Will It Be

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-18Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-18

Анотація

The European Union is imposing new restrictions prohibiting Russian citizens and residents from owning, controlling, or holding management positions in European crypto-asset service provider companies, effective from August 25, 2024. These measures, part of the EU's 21st sanctions package, extend existing bans to cover all services under the MiCA regulation, including exchanges, trading platforms, custody, and advisory services. The rules forbid direct or indirect ownership or control, and any role granting decision-making authority in such EU-based companies. They also prohibit EU crypto firms from transacting with platforms in third countries deemed by the EU to systematically facilitate sanctions circumvention; a specific list of these jurisdictions is pending. Exemptions apply to citizens and permanent residents of the EU, EEA, and Switzerland. Russians must divest holdings or relinquish management roles by the deadline. Non-compliance carries risks of criminal sanctions for individuals and licensing threats for the companies involved. The move aims to close loopholes used by Russian entities to evade financial restrictions through the crypto sector.

From 2024, Russian citizens and individuals residing in Russia are prohibited from owning, controlling, and holding positions in the management bodies of European companies providing crypto wallet, account, and digital asset custody services. The 21st package of EU sanctions, adopted at the end of July, expands these restrictions. Lawyers explained what else will be prohibited regarding Russians and European crypto companies.

What Will Change in EU Rules

From August 25, the existing ban will extend to companies providing any crypto services under the MiCA regulation, including exchanges and trading platforms, said Yuri Brisov, partner at Digital & Analogue Partners. This covers the entire list under the European Market in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation: exchange of cryptocurrency for fiat and for other cryptocurrency, order execution and transmission, crypto-asset transfers, token placement, consulting, portfolio management, custody. If previously a Russian could not own a European crypto custodian, by the end of August they will not be able to own any licensed crypto company in the EU or be part of its management.

Owning or controlling, directly or indirectly, companies providing at least one of the above-mentioned services is prohibited for Russian citizens and residents—any individuals actually permanently residing in Russian territory, regardless of their passport, explained Maria Nefedova, consultant at IPN Partners. She clarified that the prohibition also covers holding any positions in the management bodies of such companies, if the company is established under the law of an EU member state, and the term "management body" typically includes the board of directors, supervisory board, executive board, and any other statutory body of the company vested with powers of management and supervision.

"This concerns not only the position of director, but in general any position granting the right to make decisions or control the company's activities. The wording 'own or control' can also be interpreted broadly—it formally covers not only cases of direct shareholding, but also indirect ownership through a chain of companies or exercising de facto control of a company without share ownership," says Nefedova.

Also, according to her, a ban is introduced for EU companies to enter into transactions, directly or indirectly, with companies and platforms providing crypto-asset services, if they are established in "certain" third countries. This refers to countries that the EU Council recognizes as systematically not preventing the use of platforms to circumvent sanctions. A specific list of such countries has not yet been approved and will be formed by a separate Council decision as relevant jurisdictions are identified, the lawyer clarified.

Who the New EU Restrictions Apply To

The EU states that the new measures primarily aim to combat sanctions circumvention through third countries, where, according to the EU Council, the activity of Russian banks and other players in the cryptocurrency market is gradually shifting, Nefedova said. Therefore, the new prohibitions are divided into several blocks.

The first concerns personal participation: Russian citizens and individuals actually residing in Russia are prohibited from owning shares, controlling, or holding posts in the management bodies of European crypto companies. The second block concerns business itself: European operators will be prohibited from entering into transactions with crypto companies and platforms registered in those third countries that will eventually be included in the sanctions list of "problematic" jurisdictions, the expert explained.

Brisov emphasized that, since not only direct but also indirect ownership and control are prohibited, hiding a share behind a holding company or nominee will not work. He also added that parallel norms have been introduced for citizens and residents of Belarus.

"The practical burden also falls on the European crypto companies themselves. Transaction screening does not detect such violations, so companies will have to check corporate registers, beneficial owner data, and the composition of boards of directors," said Brisov.

What Exceptions Are Provided Under the New Prohibitions

The prohibition does not apply to citizens of EU, EEA countries and Switzerland, nor to individuals with temporary or permanent residence permits in these countries: a Russian with a Cyprus passport or a Portuguese residence permit is not subject to the restriction, says Brisov. He also noted that the European Commission recognizes long-term national visas, such as study, work, or humanitarian visas, as legal residence, but this depends on the specific country's law. No special industry-specific exceptions or transitional permissions for owners without European status are provided, the expert added.

There is another exception concerning EU citizens, said Nefedova. If a citizen of an EU member state permanently resided in a country that later ends up on the EU's list of "problematic" jurisdictions, and had resided there before the date of that country's inclusion in the list, the ban on transactions with local crypto platforms does not apply to them. Most likely, the date of inclusion of a specific country in the list will be explicitly stated in the annex itself, and the EU citizen will have to document the fact of residence there before that date, for example, with a residence permit, registration, or a document on tax residency in that country, the expert explained.

How the New Rules Will Affect Russian Owners and Top Managers of European Crypto Companies

From August 25, individuals not covered by exceptions who own shares in European crypto companies of any profile must cease ownership or control in such a company, says Nefedova. In turn, top managers and board members who are Russian citizens or residents also cannot hold positions in the management bodies of such companies.

A direct mechanism for a gradual exit for this category of persons is not provided. According to the expert, it is assumed that the prohibition is unconditional and requires complete cessation of participation and holding of positions by the specified date. Thus, companies will have to conduct a pre-emptive check of the ownership structure and composition of management bodies to identify all beneficial owners and officials falling under "Russian citizen" or "resident in Russia," including cases of indirect ownership through a chain of companies, explained Nefedova.

"Formally, the ban targets the Russian individual, not the company as an EU legal entity, so direct responsibility lies with them. But in practice, banks, payment systems, and company partners usually also check the composition of shareholders and the board of directors, so the fact of having a Russian beneficial owner or top manager can lead to refusal of service or contracts with the company itself," warned the lawyer.

Brisov reminded that Russians have one week left and three options for action: sell the share, exit management bodies, or confirm European status. The expert explained that those who did not manage to do so within a month of the sanctions package adoption will exit the capital on worse terms: buyers are few, and time works against the seller.

For an individual, a violation means sanctions liability, which in most EU countries is criminal, said Brisov. According to him, for a company, a Russian shareholder or director without European status becomes a direct threat to the MiCA license: regulators assess the suitability of owners and management body members, and a sanctioned status of a participant will not pass this assessment.

"The EU's logic is consistent: first, Russians were denied access to European crypto infrastructure as clients, then as counterparties, now as owners and managers," said the expert.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main change introduced by the EU's 21st sanctions package regarding Russian citizens and crypto assets?

AThe EU's 21st sanctions package, effective from 25 August, extends the existing ban. It prohibits Russian citizens and residents from owning, controlling, or holding management positions in any licensed EU crypto-asset service provider (CASPs). This includes services like exchanges, trading platforms, custody, and portfolio management covered under the MiCA regulation, not just crypto-custodians.

QWho is specifically targeted by the new EU ownership and management bans in the crypto sector?

AThe bans specifically target Russian citizens and any individuals who are residents of Russia (i.e., persons physically residing in Russia, regardless of their passport). This applies to direct or indirect ownership or control, and any position in a management body (e.g., board of directors, supervisory board) of a licensed EU crypto company.

QWhat are the two main blocks of the new EU crypto restrictions?

AThe new restrictions are divided into two main blocks. First, a ban on personal participation: prohibiting Russian citizens/residents from owning, controlling, or holding management posts in EU crypto companies. Second, a business-level ban: prohibiting EU operators from transacting with crypto companies/platforms registered in third countries that the EU Council later lists as systematically failing to prevent sanctions circumvention.

QWhat key exceptions allow individuals to avoid these new EU crypto restrictions?

AThe key exceptions are for citizens of the EU, EEA, and Switzerland, as well as individuals holding a temporary or permanent residence permit in these countries. A Russian citizen with, for example, a Cypriot passport or Portuguese residence permit would not fall under the restrictions. Long-term national visas (e.g., for work, study) may also be recognized as lawful residence depending on national law.

QWhat must Russian owners or managers of EU crypto companies do before the 25 August deadline, and what are the risks of non-compliance?

ABefore 25 August, Russian owners/managers who do not qualify for an exception must either sell their shares/stakes or resign from management positions. Failure to comply leads to sanctions liability, which is criminal in most EU countries for individuals. For the company, a sanctioned shareholder or director poses a direct threat to obtaining or maintaining a MiCA license, as regulators assess the suitability of owners and managers, and such individuals would fail that assessment.

Пов'язані матеріали

Shorting HYPE Results in $40 Million Loss, How Much Ammo Does Meme's Top Short Seller loracle Have Left?

The article details the trading saga of loracle, a prominent and controversial figure known as the "Meme Coin King of Shorts" on the Hyperliquid exchange. Initially an early contributor and a major HYPE bull, loracle amassed profits of around $42 million by early 2026 through leveraged long positions on HYPE and BTC/ETH trading. His fortune reversed dramatically when he pivoted to shorting HYPE in April 2026. Despite HYPE's relentless rally, he aggressively increased his short position, which peaked at a nominal value exceeding $100 million. When HYPE hit a record high of $75 in June, loracle was forced to cover, incurring a catastrophic loss of over $46 million, wiping out his earlier gains. His subsequent attempts to long HYPE at the top and short it again later resulted in further losses, bringing his total estimated losses on HYPE trades to over $40 million. Currently, loracle is shorting other popular memecoins like PONS and CASHCAT, positions that are currently profitable due to a recent market correction. However, his overall historical loss on Hyperliquid is estimated at around $25 million. The article explores the source of his seemingly "infinite bullets" for trading: a massive stash of HYPE tokens received as an early contributor. At its peak, loracle had staked nearly 5 million HYPE (worth hundreds of millions). However, to cover his massive contract losses, he has sold off the majority of this stash. His remaining HYPE holdings are now valued at approximately $26 million. In conclusion, loracle's story exemplifies high-risk leveraged trading in the volatile memecoin market. His journey from top HYPE bull to its biggest short seller, funded and ultimately drained by his own HYPE holdings, highlights the extreme risks and potential for rapid ruin in this space.

marsbit25 хв тому

Shorting HYPE Results in $40 Million Loss, How Much Ammo Does Meme's Top Short Seller loracle Have Left?

marsbit25 хв тому

a16z Crypto: A New Approach for Financial Institutions to Go On-Chain

a16z Crypto argues that financial institutions can successfully operate on permissionless blockchain networks while meeting compliance obligations. The article dispels the misconception that such networks are inherently incompatible with laws like the Bank Secrecy Act (AML/CFT) and sanctions regimes. It clarifies that compliance requires "reasonably designed" risk-based controls, not the elimination of all risk or direct oversight of the underlying infrastructure, such as network validators. The analysis draws parallels to the public internet, where institutions rely on shared infrastructure without screening every router or user. Legal and regulatory guidance, including interpretive letters from the OCC, supports the view that paying network fees on permissionless networks does not constitute a sanctionable transaction with a validator, as the interaction is protocol-driven and non-discretionary. Furthermore, privacy concerns on public ledgers can be addressed through cryptographic techniques like zero-knowledge proofs for sanctions screening or confidential transfers with audit keys. These allow for necessary compliance verification without exposing sensitive business information. The piece concludes by advocating for a compliance framework focused on application-layer controls over customers and counterparties, not the network layer. It warns that avoiding permissionless networks cedes opportunities and reduces oversight of the growing dollar-denominated activity already occurring on them.

marsbit30 хв тому

a16z Crypto: A New Approach for Financial Institutions to Go On-Chain

marsbit30 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片