Ending 'Subsidized Growth': The Logic of Ultimate Capital Efficiency Behind Berachain's 'Fiscal' Reform

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-10Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-10

Анотація

Berachain has implemented a major reform of its Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) mechanism, reducing the annual inflation rate of its non-transferable governance token $BGT from 8% to 5%—a 46% cut in emissions. This move, described as a "fiscal reform," signals the end of the initial subsidy-driven growth phase and a shift toward a more capital-efficient economic model. The update also involves removing around 200 underperforming reward vaults and introducing stricter, performance-based criteria for vault eligibility. Key tokens in the PoL system include $BERA (gas token), $HONEY (native stablecoin), and $BGT (governance token). The reforms aim to enhance the value and utility of $BGT by directing incentives toward protocols that demonstrate real user activity, sustainable demand, and measurable contributions to the ecosystem—such as boosting transaction volume or deepening liquidity. This restructuring is designed to prioritize quality over quantity, encouraging projects with stronger product-market fit and business models. By making $BGT emissions more scarce and targeted, Berachain aims to build a self-sustaining economy where incentives function as productive capital rather than subsidies, ultimately supporting long-term growth and value creation for token holders.

Author: Black Mario

Recently, Berachain's PoL mechanism underwent a reform, reducing the annual inflation rate of $BGT from 8% to 5% (an active cut of approximately 46% in emissions), while clearing a series of "ghost vaults" and updating the vault access standards. This move has been hailed by the community as a sovereign fiscal reform.

This seems to signal that Berachain is officially ending the subsidy era of its cold start, and through ultimate "capital efficiency" and a "business closed-loop," it is beginning to build a mature economic system with higher ROI certainty.

The Logical Evolution from Cold Start Strategy to Sovereign Value Return

In traditional PoS systems, security is directly tied to the scale of staking, and "staking coins equals participation in governance" is the core logic. Focusing on the PoL (Proof-of-Liquidity) mechanism itself, it is a highly complex financial engineering design that binds network security, governance power, and ecological liquidity together with liquidity as the core element, attempting to redefine the internal power distribution and incentive flow within a public chain.

The operation of the PoL system relies on three types of tokens with clear functions and mutual checks and balances.

  • $BERA (Fuel Base): The operating fuel of the system, carrying basic security functions, is the asset foundation of the entire Berachain.
  • $HONEY (Value Scale): An over-collateralized native stablecoin, serving as the financial settlement medium within the ecosystem, ensuring the stability of on-chain economic activities.
  • $BGT (Governance Hub): As a non-transferable soul-bound token, $BGT is the soul of the PoL system. It deeply binds governance rights with "real ecological contributions." Holding and delegating $BGT means mastering the distribution rights of network incentive routing.

Validators, by receiving delegated $BGT, can dynamically influence which Reward Vaults the incentives flow to. This is not only a symbol of power but also the most critical value lever in Berachain's sovereign economic system.

In the early stages of the mainnet launch, Berachain adopted a high inflation model of approximately 8%–10%. As a typical cold start strategy, it successfully achieved primitive accumulation of liquidity in the short term and verified the实战 resilience of the PoL mechanism.

However, as the ecosystem matures, some potential issues have emerged:

  • The high-yield environment in the early stage attracted a large amount of highly sensitive capital. While this capital completed the task of attracting funds during the cold start phase, its contribution to long-term retention and commercial co-building still has room for optimization.
  • Some vaults in the ecosystem are operating inefficiently, and there are even some self-circulating distribution paths. This, to some extent, disperses the precious $BGT budget and fails to fully transform into long-term stickiness of the ecosystem.
  • Sustained high emission rates have somewhat affected the marginal value of $BGT as a sovereign asset. For long-term builders, optimizing the inflation structure is an inevitable choice to protect their long-term rights and enhance the network's risk resistance.

If the PoL incentive mechanism eventually evolves into a pure operating cost, no matter how good the short-term data looks, the long-term value of the entire ecosystem will face limitations. Incentives should not be just subsidies, nor should they be indiscriminate airdrops. Instead, they should be regarded as productive capital capable of generating ROI. Every unit of $BGT emission should be exchanged for sustainable transactions, user retention, and real cash flow potential. This is perhaps the true meaning behind the slogan "Bera Builds Businesses."

Under this consensus, this reform aimed at "eliminating the false and retaining the true" and重构 sovereign fiscal efficiency officially kicked off at the beginning of the new year 2026.

Berachain's "Fiscal" Reform

$BGT Emission Optimization: Anchoring the Long-Term Value Coordinates of the Ecosystem

In fact, in any mature economy, adjustments in monetary policy often signal a qualitative change in the growth logic. Berachain's reduction of the annual $BGT inflation rate from about 8% to 5% is essentially a key step towards "value sovereignty."

We see that the earlier 8% inflation rate was more like an "expansionary credit" for the ecosystem's startup phase, successfully completing the primitive accumulation of liquidity in the short term. Now, reducing PoL-related emissions by approximately 46% (reward rate reduced from 1.2 to 0.65) not only reflects its precise control over the current ecosystem's carrying capacity and incentive efficiency but also embodies a refinement of liquidity management:

That is, while maintaining the stability of the network security base rate, by moderately tightening new emissions, ensuring that every $BGT injected into the ecosystem gains a higher value anchor.

For $BGT, a governance asset with the attributes of a soul-bound token, scarcity is the core pillar for exercising its引流 power. As the emission rate slows, the marginal dilution pressure faced by holders and delegators is significantly reduced. This "active balance sheet reduction" directly strengthens the hard currency属性 of $BGT as a core governance asset, further promoting the rebalancing of value capture:

Of course, if we observe the development paths of Ethereum or various top L1s, a steady decline in the inflation rate is often the entry ticket to the "golden maturity period." Berachain's turn at this moment actually sends a clear signal that the ecosystem has already achieved stability driven by "endogenous growth" and no longer relies solely on scale expansion.

Then, as the total incentive becomes more precious, protocols within the ecosystem will spontaneously initiate an efficiency competition.

This "tight" incentive budget is actually creating higher溢价 space for high-quality protocols. Under the new economic model, $BGT emission rights will flow more to those "high-productivity protocols" that can generate real interactions and have a deep user base.

Reward Vault Integration—Ecological Value Sedimentation from "Scale Expansion" to "Quality and Depth"

If inflation reduction is a "balance sheet reduction" at the macro level, then the further integration of reward vaults is a precise drip irrigation targeting micro-efficiency within the ecosystem.

The Berachain Foundation stated in its latest tweet that the ecosystem plans to remove about 200 reward vaults with low operational efficiency. Of course, the plan itself is not simply a negation of early projects but more of a resource rebalancing expected after the Berachain ecosystem enters a specific stage.

In fact, during the cold start phase, a wide distribution of vaults helps探测 different market demands. When the ecosystem enters maturity, withdrawing incentive resources from长期闲置 or functionally overlapping pools and re-injecting them into core protocols with real trading activity is an inevitable choice to enhance the network's overall competitiveness.

Similarly, with the integration, Berachain immediately enacted more rigorous and dynamic vault access standards. This means that future incentive distribution will no longer be based on the first-come-first-served inertia of the early days but will更多的是 based on a multi-dimensional KPI evaluation system. Some potential standards may include:

  • Sustained Demand: Examining whether the protocol has generated real transaction volume and user interaction, not just static沉淀 of funds.
  • External Incentive Coordination: Encouraging protocol parties to use their own resources and external financing to form a synergy with $BGT emissions, jointly energizing the ecosystem.
  • Verifiable Contribution: Every unit of incentive emission must be transformed into an observable network effect, such as the depth of $HONEY liquidity or the value回流 of transaction fees.

By clearing some self-circulating or inefficient incentive paths, Berachain is actually making room for growth for teams with real product strength. This process of "discarding the dross and selecting the essential" aims to end models that rely solely on system subsidies for survival,转而扶持 business entities with independent profitability capabilities.

This is also perhaps the embodiment of the "Bera Builds Businesses" vision: the incentive mechanism is no longer an indiscriminate温床 but a precise capital accelerator. Projects筛选ed through this mechanism will have stronger risk resistance and commercial value, thereby providing $BGT holders with more确定性 value support in the fierce L1 competition.

Evolution is the Only Way Out

This major reform of Berachain's PoL marks the ecosystem's official paradigm shift towards a "mature L1 with real output." By optimizing emission efficiency, the ecosystem is彻底重构 $BGT emissions into productive capital with ROI certainty. While pushing the network towards the ultimate capital efficiency interval, it is also anchoring a more solid value signal for $BGT and $BERA holders.

Under the new pilot mechanism, incentives are endowed with precise引流 properties: every unit of injected liquidity will激发超额 real transaction fees, interest income, or ecological溢价 at the protocol layer, thereby constructing a positive value closed-loop of "incentive cost < protocol收益".

This "1 > 1 capital alchemy" is a public chain-level active asset management system,正在 transforming every bit of inflation into KPIs that drive commercial prosperity, fundamentally locking in the return of Berachain's long-term sovereign value, and establishing a leading position towards real economic growth and business闭环 in the highly homogeneous L1 track.

Thus, "Bera Builds Businesses" is also transforming from a grand narrative into a precise financial engine.

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core change in Berachain's PoL mechanism as described in the article?

AThe core change is a reduction in the annual inflation rate of $BGT from 8% to 5%, which is an active cut of approximately 46% in emissions.

QWhat are the three tokens in the PoL system and their primary functions?

AThe three tokens are: $BERA (the gas token and base for security), $HONEY (an over-collateralized native stablecoin for financial settlement), and $BGT (a non-transferable soulbound token that serves as the governance hub, binding governance power to 'real contributions' to the ecosystem).

QWhat was the main purpose of the high inflation model (8-10%) used by Berachain at its mainnet launch?

AIt was a cold-start strategy designed to achieve the primitive accumulation of liquidity in the short term and validate the practical resilience of the PoL mechanism.

QWhat are some of the new potential criteria for a vault to gain access to incentives after the reform?

APotential criteria include: Sustainable Demand (real transaction volume and user interaction), Coordination with External Incentives (using the protocol's own resources and external financing alongside $BGT emissions), and Verifiable Contribution (converting each unit of incentive into observable network effects like $HONEY liquidity depth or fee value回流).

QHow does the article characterize the ultimate goal of Berachain's incentive mechanism after this reform?

AThe goal is to transform the incentive mechanism from a blanket subsidy into a precise capital accelerator, ensuring every unit of $BGT emission is productive capital with a high certainty of ROI, ultimately building a positive value closed-loop where 'incentive cost

Пов'язані матеріали

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit13 хв тому

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit13 хв тому

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit14 хв тому

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit14 хв тому

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News24 хв тому

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News24 хв тому

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit41 хв тому

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit41 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Популярні статті

Як купити POL

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL)Після придбання Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL)Легко торгуйте Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

271 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.11Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити POL

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни POL (POL).

活动图片