Emission Shock: TRUMP, MELANIA lose 86–99% as circulating supply doubles in three months

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2025-12-10Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-10

Анотація

New tokens like TRUMP and MELANIA have plummeted 86–99% in value as their circulating supply doubled within three months, according to Tokenomist data. The report highlights aggressive token emissions and expanding float as key factors causing severe price declines, despite initial hype. Examples include Layer (-99.7%), Melania (-98%), and GoPlus Security (-92%). Market liquidity has shifted toward major cryptocurrencies and real-world assets, leaving newer tokens vulnerable. Even projects with genuine utility, like GoPlus, suffered due to poor tokenomics. The analysis concludes that unsustainable emission schedules and weak supply control are primary drivers of post-launch price collapse.

Tokens launched in Q1, such as TRUMP and MELANIA, are facing extreme downside pressure despite early hype, according to fresh Tokenomist data. The data compared launch prices with current circulating supply and market performance.

In every case monitored, circulating float expanded aggressively while prices collapsed between 86% and 99% since launch.

Massive issuance, collapsing prices

The report highlights a steep increase in circulating supply across a group of newly launched assets, including Official Trump, Melania, Layer, Plume, GoPlus Security, and Bubblemaps.

In most cases, circulating float doubled within three months, placing continuous sell-pressure on secondary markets, causing emission shock.

For example:

  • Layer moved from 21% to 31% float and is down 99.7%
  • Melania expanded from 25% to 55% and is down 98%
  • GoPlus Security moved from 15% to 29% and is down 92%
  • Plume moved from 20% to 33% and is down 86%

While individual narratives differ, the market reaction follows a similar pattern: heavy token emissions combined with thin liquidity result in forced price discovery at sharply lower levels.

Liquidity concentration favors majors

The broad rotation into Bitcoin, Ethereum, and real-world asset tokens over recent months has left smaller new launches exposed to liquidity shortages.

With capital gravitating toward majors and RWAs, newer tokens have little structural demand to absorb new supply.

This pattern is typical in phases where liquidity becomes conservative and retail participation fades.

In such environments, emission schedules matter more than product fundamentals, and even genuine use cases may not be enough to protect a token from emission shock.

Surface-level demand isn’t enough

GoPlus Security stands out as a token linked to meaningful cybersecurity infrastructure, yet its price is still down over 92% from launch.

The data reinforces a consistent theme across past cycles: practical utility does not always translate to token value when tokenomics work against holders.

Market watchers attribute token design, vesting schedules, and aggressive post-launch float increases as the primary drivers of these drawdowns, rather than project quality alone.


Final Thoughts

  • Token design remains one of the strongest determinants of post-launch price behavior.
  • Until new projects prioritize sustainable emissions and tighter supply control, newly issued assets are likely to remain vulnerable to emission shock and long-term price suppression.

Пов'язані матеріали

Rebuttal: I Don't Regret Spending 8 Years in the Crypto Industry

Ken Chang recently wrote an article lamenting his eight years in crypto as a waste, describing the industry as inherently destructive and a system of financial nihilism that has built the world's largest casino. While many in the space dismiss such critiques, the author acknowledges that Ken’s disillusionment—shared by earlier figures like Mike Hearn—stems from a genuine idealistic disappointment. Crypto promised decentralization and a new financial system but largely delivered speculation and gambling. The author identifies five core aspirations of cryptocurrency: restoring sound money, encoding business logic via smart contracts, making digital property real, improving capital market efficiency, and expanding global financial inclusion. While progress has been made in areas like Bitcoin, stablecoins, and certain efficient financial infrastructures, many grand visions—like overthrowing fiat or revolutionizing digital ownership—remain unfulfilled. The author advocates for a "pragmatic optimism." Speculation and casino-like dynamics are seen as unfortunate but inevitable side effects of building permissionless, open financial infrastructure. The key is to focus on the real, albeit gradual, progress—such as improved financial access and inclusion—while accepting that transformative change is slow and often captured by incremental efficiency gains, not revolution. The goal remains worthy, even if the path is messier than hoped.

marsbit15 хв тому

Rebuttal: I Don't Regret Spending 8 Years in the Crypto Industry

marsbit15 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片