DoubleZero gains 11% – Analyzing if 2Z can hold above $0.08

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-26Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-26

Анотація

DoubleZero (2Z) surged 11% in 24 hours, with trading volume up 78% to $12 million, driven by institutional inflows and a technical breakout. The altcoin saw $37.79 million in USD inflows after recent outflows, with Solana leading token inflows. The price broke above a key descending trendline at $0.06647 and is now testing resistance at $0.07560. To sustain bullish momentum, it must hold above $0.08. The MACD indicates growing bullish strength, with net buy volume positive. However, TVL has declined from its yearly high of $1.9 billion to $1.083 billion, and fees have dropped to around $316K, showing mixed on-chain activity.

DoubleZero [2Z] surged by 11% following a broader market resurgence in the past 24 hours, at press time. During this spike, the volume spiked by more than 78%, reaching $12 million at press time.

Analytically, the rally was driven by institutions, USD inflows, and a technical breakout on the charts.

Daily USD inflows turn positive

As per data from DefiLlama, the altcoin saw positive inflows after two consecutive days of outflows. About $37.79 million had entered the 2Z market, though it was still small compared to the $90 million that left.

Since the start of February, the platform has seen more outflows than inflows. Over the past two weeks, its highest inflow has been $78 million, while its biggest outflow was $55 million the day before.

For these inflows by token, Solana [SOL] topped in the past 24 hours. This is probably because the token was deployed on the Solana blockchain. This increase took the total of Solana mainnet staking on DoubleZero to 168 million SOL.

Additionally, institutions were still convinced and were pouring in capital. For instance, crypto investment firm DBA maintained a stake in DoubleZero as its strategy to back Bitcoin [BTC] with its $68 million Fund II. This reinforced institutional backing.

2Z invalidates the descending trendline

The charts showed that 2Z broke above a descending trendline at $0.06647 that had held the price since the 24th of January. DoubleZero’s price continued to rise but now battles the mini resistance at $0.07560.

For the altcoin to sustain the shift in direction bias and momentum, the price has to stay above $0.08, which was the last lower low of the structure.

At press time, the MACD showed that bullish strength was increasing, as confirmed by the net buy volume. The Net Volume showed that buyers had outdone sellers, as they scooped 2.32 million 2Z tokens more than their counterparts sold.

The invalidation of the existing price structure hinted at a potential bottom. This takes into account that $0.06913 was around the launch price of 2Z on Binance’s Spot market. Still, there was potential for a pullback for a retest of this breakout.

TVL declines from yearly highs

The Total Value Locked (TVL) and fees showed DoubleZero’s influence in the crypto industry, especially staking.

The altcoin had $1.083 billion in TVL, almost 7x more than that of Cardano [ADA], which was at $161 million as per DefiLlama data.

DoubleZero’s TVL experienced a decline from its ATH high of $1.9 billion achieved this year. Its fees also dropped to around $316K at press time.

These metric readings showed that activity was mixed in sentiment, as USD inflows were positive while TVL was declining. On the other hand, price action was breaking out, but sustaining the rally depended on staying above $0.080.


Final Summary

  • DoubleZero rallied about 11% in the past 24 hours amid positive inflows.
  • For 2Z to remain bullish on the 4-hour chart, the price needs to break and stay above $0.080.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the percentage increase in DoubleZero's price in the past 24 hours and what was the accompanying volume spike?

ADoubleZero's price surged by 11% and its trading volume spiked by more than 78%, reaching $12 million.

QAccording to the article, what were the three main drivers behind the DoubleZero rally?

AThe rally was driven by institutions, USD inflows, and a technical breakout on the charts.

QWhat key price level must DoubleZero's price stay above to sustain its bullish momentum and shift in direction bias?

AThe price must stay above $0.08, which was the last lower low of the structure.

QWhich blockchain's token topped the inflows in the past 24 hours and what was the result for its mainnet staking on DoubleZero?

ASolana [SOL] topped the inflows, and this increase took the total of Solana mainnet staking on DoubleZero to 168 million SOL.

QHow does DoubleZero's current Total Value Locked (TVL) compare to that of Cardano [ADA], and what was the trend for its TVL?

ADoubleZero's TVL was $1.083 billion, almost 7x more than Cardano's $161 million. However, it had declined from its all-time high of $1.9 billion achieved earlier in the year.

Пов'язані матеріали

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit1 год тому

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit1 год тому

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit7 год тому

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit7 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片