Dogecoin loses $0.10 support: Can DOGE stop the downtrend?

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-20

Анотація

Dogecoin (DOGE) broke below the critical $0.10 support level, reaching a local low of $0.095 before a slight rebound to $0.098. The downtrend is driven by persistent bearish pressure, with sellers dominating the market for over a month. Key indicators like the Bulls and Bears Power and Buyer-Seller Strength show significant bearish control, while exchange data reveals higher sell volumes and a negative buy-sell delta. The Price Momentum Oscillator remains negative, and the RSI stays below 50, indicating continued downward momentum. If the trend persists, DOGE could drop to $0.092 or even $0.08. A reversal would require reclaiming and holding above $0.11.

With bearish pressure and market weakness persisting, Dogecoin [DOGE] broke below the $0.10 support, hitting a local low of $0.095 before rebounding slightly to $0.099.

At press time, DOGE was trading at $0.098, up 0.73%, reflecting heightened volatility.

Bearish pressure strains Dogecoin’s structure

DOGE lost its $ 0.10 support level again, largely driven by heightened sell-side activity. As such, DOGE sellers have dumped at every opportunity, further straining the market.

Looking at the Bulls and Bears power indicator on TradingView, the Bears have commanded total control of the market.

Bears have dominated the market for thirty consecutive days since displacing sellers on the 19th of January, and all attempts by bulls to regain control have failed.

At press time, the Bears’ position was 64 compared to 9 for the Bulls, reflecting a significant gap in their market presence. As such, although bulls are active, their presence remains insufficient to sustain a trend reversal.

The Buyer-Seller Strength indicator further supports this. Sellers have remained relatively powerful, with their strength hiking to 68 at press time.

Coupled with that, exchange activity also echoed this bearish dominance. According to Coinalyze, Dogecoin recorded higher Sell Volume for five consecutive days, signaling a lack of bullish conviction.

Over the past day, for example, the memecoin saw 697 million in Sell Volume compared to 619 million in Buy Volume. As a result, the market recorded a negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million, a clear sign of aggressive selling.

Historically, such market behavior has tended to strengthen downside and weaken any upside momentum, leading to lower prices.

Is DOGE at risk of further slip?

Dogecoin traded below its critical support level, amid sustained bearish pressure. With bears running riot in the market, all attempts by bulls to hold on have proved futile.

In fact, the memecoin’s Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO) remained negative despite making a bullish crossover days ago. With the PMO holding a negative, it suggests that most price changes have been negative on average.

Thus, markets have closed at lower levels, signaling a bearish trend and confirming a medium- to long-term downtrend, not a mere pullback.

At the same time, the memecoin’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has remained stuck below 50 for a week, further validating this bearishness. Persistent bearish momentum signals a likelihood of downside continuation.

A trend continuation could see DOGE drop to $0.092, most likely losing its $0.09 support, and then fall to $0.08. To invalidate this bearish scenario, DOGE must reclaim $0.1 and firmly hold $0.11.


Final Summary

  • Dogecoin slipped below $0.1, hitting a low of $0.095 before rising slightly to $0.098 at press time.
  • DOGE’s downside spiral continued amid persisting bearish dominance in the market.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was Dogecoin's price movement after losing the $0.10 support level?

ADogecoin broke below the $0.10 support, hitting a local low of $0.095 before rebounding slightly to $0.099. At press time, it was trading at $0.098.

QAccording to the Bulls and Bears power indicator, how long have bears controlled the DOGE market?

ABears have commanded total control of the market for thirty consecutive days since displacing sellers on the 19th of January.

QWhat does the negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million indicate about market activity?

AThe negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million is a clear sign of aggressive selling, with sell volume (697 million) significantly outpacing buy volume (619 million) over the past day.

QWhat two key price levels does DOGE need to reclaim to invalidate the current bearish scenario?

ATo invalidate the bearish scenario, DOGE must reclaim the $0.10 level and then firmly hold above $0.11.

QWhat do the Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO) and Relative Strength Index (RSI) suggest about DOGE's trend?

AThe PMO remained negative, confirming a medium- to long-term downtrend, and the RSI has been stuck below 50 for a week, both validating persistent bearish momentum and a likelihood of further downside.

Пов'язані матеріали

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 15 days, triggering massive index fund buying. However, critics cite extreme valuation (88x sales) and market liquidity concerns.

marsbit24 хв тому

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbit24 хв тому

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Mega IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare? The capital market in 2026 is witnessing a highly anticipated wave of tech IPOs, centered on SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Collectively valued at over $3.5 trillion, their potential listing represents one of the largest such waves in recent years. This raises concerns about market liquidity, valuation bubbles, and potential capital outflows from other assets like crypto. SpaceX's valuation narrative has shifted from rocket launches to becoming a global infrastructure play via its Starlink satellite network, which now drives most revenue. Despite ongoing losses, investors focus on its long-term growth potential. OpenAI and Anthropic represent the core productivity engines of generative AI. Their public listings would offer the first direct investment opportunity in large foundation model companies, potentially triggering a repricing within the AI sector. Market fears of a massive "capital drain" from these IPOs are likely overstated. Historical precedents like Alibaba and Saudi Aramco show that mega-listings primarily cause capital reallocation, not destruction, within the vast equities market. Systemic risk is rarely triggered by IPOs alone. For stock markets, short-term volatility and sector repricing are expected, especially for AI concept stocks. Long-term, these listings could reinforce the tech sector's importance. For crypto, direct competition for speculative capital exists, particularly affecting AI-themed tokens. However, crypto's trajectory remains more tied to its own cycles, macro liquidity, and Bitcoin ETF flows rather than a single IPO event. The real risk lies not in the listings themselves but in the sky-high growth expectations embedded in these valuations. If future revenue, profitability, or commercialization progress disappoints, significant valuation resets could follow, impacting high-growth tech stocks. Ultimately, the market's direction hinges on macroeconomic conditions and whether these companies can deliver on their ambitious promises.

链捕手40 хв тому

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

链捕手40 хв тому

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Title: Trillion-Dollar Valuations at Stake: Super IPOs of SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic – Tech Boom or Crypto Nightmare? TL;DR: A wave of mega-tech IPOs is approaching, featuring SpaceX (targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation), OpenAI (~$852B), and Anthropic (~$965B), with a combined potential valuation exceeding $3.5 trillion. This tests the market's pricing of innovation and sparks debate on liquidity impact. * **SpaceX**'s valuation is now driven more by its Starlink global communications infrastructure than its core rocket business. * **OpenAI & Anthropic** offer the first major public investment opportunities in foundational AI models, potentially repricing the entire AI sector. * Concerns about a market-wide "liquidity drain" are likely overblown; history shows large IPOs mainly cause fund reallocation, not disappearance, and rarely trigger systemic risk. * Crypto markets, especially some AI-themed tokens, may face short-term fund competition, but their long-term trajectory depends more on macro liquidity, regulation, and Bitcoin cycles. * The real risk lies not in the IPOs themselves, but in whether these companies can justify their sky-high valuations with future revenue growth and profitability. Unmet expectations could lead to significant repricing pressure. Ultimately, these IPOs represent a massive market pricing of next-gen tech infrastructure, not a prelude to a market crash. The broader market direction will be determined by macro conditions, corporate earnings, and risk appetite.

marsbit40 хв тому

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

marsbit40 хв тому

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit1 год тому

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片