Decoding MYX’s 11% dip: THIS, not panic, could shape what’s next!

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-05

Анотація

MY Summary MYX Finance (MYX) experienced an 11% price decline on January 5th, primarily driven by significant profit-taking in the perpetual markets rather than forced liquidations. While Open Interest dropped by $16.7 million, total liquidations remained low at just $1.02 million, indicating traders were intentionally closing positions. Despite the sell-off, key metrics suggest underlying bullish sentiment. The Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate stayed positive, and Total Value Locked (TVL) increased by approximately $720,000 since January 1st, demonstrating sustained investor conviction. On-chain activity also grew, with perpetual trading volume surging by $66.24 million in a day. The liquidation heatmap indicates that liquidity clusters are concentrated above the current price, which could attract an upward move. The dominance of long positions further supports the potential for a rebound, framing the recent drop as a corrective phase with a high likelihood of recovery.

MYX Finance [MYX] had a difficult start to the day, sliding 11% as market conditions shifted in favor of bears on the 5th of January.

Despite sellers maintaining control, market data showed buyers stayed active, keeping the probability of a rebound elevated.

Why did the market decline?

The recent pullback appears tied to heavy profit-taking in the perpetual market over the past day.

This activity is reflected across three key MYX perpetual indicators. Its Open Interest dropped by approximately $16.7 million during the period, signaling a reduction in the total value of outstanding MYX contracts in the perpetual market.

Despite the scale of capital outflows, MYX total liquidations—positions forcefully closed after hitting stop-loss levels—remained limited at just $1.02 million.

This suggested that roughly $15.68 million worth of the altcoin’s positions were intentionally closed by traders, likely taking profits rather than being forced out. That may have briefly pressured the price as positions changed hands at lower levels.

Further supporting this view, MYX Open Interest–Weighted Funding Rate remained positive throughout the decline.

A positive Funding Rate indicates that most open positions are bullish, suggesting sentiment continues to lean to the upside despite the pullback.

On-chain activity sees modest growth

On-chain activity has recorded modest growth, even as protocol revenue remains relatively low, rising from $5 to $18.

Total Value Locked (TVL), which tracks the amount of liquidity committed to protocols, has continued to increase despite price weakness.

Since the 1st of January, TVL has risen by approximately $720,000, pointing to sustained conviction among investors who continue to lock the tokens for periodic rewards and a longer-term outlook.

Additional metrics reinforce this trend. Perpetual Trading Volume on decentralized exchanges increased sharply.

Over the past day, the aforementioned Volume climbed by $66.24 million, while Cumulative Volume over the last seven days reached $1.936 billion.

Rally or further decline?

The Liquidation Heatmap supported a potentially bullish outlook for MYX, as liquidity clusters remain largely concentrated above the current price.

These clusters represent zones of unfilled orders on the chart and often attract price movement, acting as liquidity magnets.

With more liquidity positioned above the price, MYX may attempt an upward move to fill these orders.

This view is further reinforced by the dominance of long positions in the perpetual market, strengthening the case for a potential rebound.

For now, the recent decline appears to represent a corrective phase, with the likelihood of a recovery remaining high.


Final Thoughts

  • MYX’s decline stemmed mainly from profit-taking in perpetual markets rather than forced liquidations.
  • Despite the price drop, positive Funding Rates, rising TVL, and growing on-chain activity suggested buyers retained conviction.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the main reason for MYX Finance's 11% price decline on January 5th?

AThe decline was primarily due to heavy profit-taking in the perpetual market, not forced liquidations.

QDespite the price drop, what key perpetual indicator remained positive, suggesting continued bullish sentiment?

AThe Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate remained positive throughout the decline.

QWhat on-chain metric showed sustained investor conviction by increasing despite the price weakness?

ATotal Value Locked (TVL) continued to increase, rising by approximately $720,000 since January 1st.

QHow much did the Perpetual Trading Volume on decentralized exchanges increase over the past day?

AIt increased sharply by $66.24 million over the past day.

QAccording to the Liquidation Heatmap, why is a potential rebound for MYX considered likely?

ABecause liquidity clusters are largely concentrated above the current price, which often attracts price movement upward to fill these orders.

Пов'язані матеріали

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit1 год тому

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit1 год тому

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit7 год тому

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit7 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片