‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-05

Анотація

Eric Trump, son of former U.S. President Donald Trump, has criticized banks for their strong opposition to stablecoin yields, calling it "anti-retail, anti-consumer, and anti-American." He claims banks are fighting crypto platforms that offer 4–5%+ yields, but are losing as customers become aware. Tensions between banks and crypto have escalated, threatening the CLARITY Act. Recently, Kraken became the first crypto firm to gain access to the Fed’s payment rails, a move opposed by banks citing financial risks. President Trump also warned banks against undermining his crypto agenda. The rift risks stalling the crypto bill, with prediction markets showing a 71% chance of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026, down from 78%.

Eric Trump, the son of U.S. President Donald Trump, has criticized banks’ strong opposition to stablecoin yield.

In a statement on the 4th of March, Eric Trump said the banks’ fight against stablecoin yield is “anti-retail, anti-consumer, and anti-American.”

He added,

“The banks are desperately targeting crypto/stablecoins, where platforms plan to offer 4–5%+ yields or rewards. Fortunately, the big banks are losing this fight as customers wake up to the games...”

The rift between crypto and banks has worsened over the past few months and threatened to stall the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act.

There have been ongoing negotiations to reach a stablecoin yield deal between the two industries to advance the bill. However, the recent grant of access to Fed payment rails to Kraken has irked the banks.

Banks oppose Kraken’s access to Fed payment rails

On Wednesday, Kraken became the first crypto-native firm to gain access to the Fed’s payment rails. It had applied for a license five years ago and only received approval this week.

Although crypto supporters hailed the update as a watershed moment for the sector, banks, through the American Bankers Association (ABA), strongly opposed it.

According to the banking lobby, the move was rushed and could expose the financial system to risks.

Interestingly, President Trump also recently warned the banks against undermining his crypto agenda.

He cautioned the bank lobby against pushing to amend the stablecoin law, the GENIUS Act, or holding the CLARITY Act hostage over stablecoin yield.

Will banks stall the crypto bill?

Whether banks will come back to the negotiating table to advance the CLARITY Act remains unclear.

However, the recent developments don’t augur well for the previously optimistic outlook of the potential passage of the CLARITY Act by mid-2026.

Even so, prediction site Polymarket showed a 71% chance of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026.

However, the odds had dropped sharply from 78% to 71% in the past two days, amid a deepening rift between banks and crypto alongside the Trump Administration.

That said, the recent crypto market recovery could be affected if the rift deepens and derails the CLARITY Act’s progress.


Final Summary

  • Eric Trump joined his father, U.S. President Donald Trump, in slamming banks’ strong opposition to stablecoin yield.
  • It is unclear whether banks will withdraw support for the CLARITY Act after opposing Kraken’s limited access to the Fed’s payment rails.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did Eric Trump criticize banks for regarding stablecoins?

AEric Trump criticized banks for their strong opposition to stablecoin yield, calling it 'anti-retail, anti-consumer, and anti-American.'

QWhich crypto firm recently gained access to the Fed's payment rails, and why did banks oppose it?

AKraken became the first crypto-native firm to gain access to the Fed's payment rails. Banks, through the American Bankers Association (ABA), opposed it, claiming the move was rushed and could expose the financial system to risks.

QWhat is the name of the crypto market structure bill that is threatened by the rift between banks and crypto?

AThe crypto market structure bill threatened by the rift is called the CLARITY Act.

QAccording to Polymarket, what are the odds of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026?

AAccording to Polymarket, there is a 71% chance of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026, though the odds dropped from 78% in the past two days.

QWhat did President Donald Trump recently warn banks about concerning his crypto agenda?

APresident Donald Trump warned banks against undermining his crypto agenda, cautioning them against pushing to amend the stablecoin law (the GENIUS Act) or holding the CLARITY Act hostage over stablecoin yield.

Пов'язані матеріали

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手3 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手3 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit5 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit5 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手6 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手6 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit7 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit7 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片