Cryptocurrency Company Alameda Research Takes a Major Step Regarding Solana Staking! Is a Sell-Off Coming? Here Are the Details

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-12

Анотація

Crypto firm Alameda Research, the bankrupt FTX's trading arm, has taken a significant step concerning its Solana (SOL) holdings. After nearly five years, Alameda unstaked 201,740 SOL and transferred a total of 201,780 SOL to a BitGo custody wallet. This move has fueled market expectations that Alameda is preparing to sell its long-dormant SOL assets. Blockchain data suggests the transfer may be for an over-the-counter (OTC) sale facilitated through BitGo, rather than a direct market sale. OTC deals are often preferred for large-volume transactions to avoid creating sudden selling pressure on open exchanges. The unstaking of assets locked for approximately five years adds significance to the transfer, as it frees them for potential sale or reuse. While the transfer does not guarantee an immediate sale, moving funds to a custody wallet is closely watched. The ongoing liquidation of assets from Alameda and FTX's bankruptcy remains a major topic, and large transactions like this are seen by the market as a potential indicator of future selling pressure. Whether Alameda will proceed with an OTC sale is currently unknown.

Alameda Research, the cryptocurrency division of the bankrupt FTX, has transferred a significant portion of its assets in Solana ($SOL) after a hiatus of nearly five years. According to information published by the data platform Onchain Lens, Alameda unlocked 201,740 $SOL, withdrawing them from staking, and then transferred a total of 201,780 $SOL to a custodial wallet owned by BitGo.

This transaction has reinforced expectations that Alameda is preparing to sell its long-dormant $SOL assets. Blockchain data suggests the transaction might have been conducted for an over-the-counter (OTC) sale via BitGo, rather than for direct token sales on exchanges.

OTC deals stand out as the preferred method, especially for selling large volumes of crypto assets. Since conducting large-scale trades directly on open markets can create sudden selling pressure on prices, institutional investors and large portfolio holders often utilize OTC markets.

The fact that Alameda has released these $SOL assets, which had been in staking for about five years, also adds significance to this transfer. Releasing assets locked in staking deals allows their owners to reuse or sell them.

Although it is claimed that the transfer does not necessarily indicate a sale, the movement of funds to a BitGo custodial wallet is being closely watched by the cryptocurrency market. The liquidation of assets as part of the bankruptcy proceedings of Alameda and FTX continues to be a significant topic in the cryptocurrency market in recent years.

Major transactions involving securities like $SOL, in particular, can be interpreted by market participants as an indicator of potential selling pressure. Whether Alameda will actually sell these assets via the OTC market remains unknown.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the recent significant action taken by Alameda Research regarding its Solana assets?

AAlameda Research has recently unlocked 201,740 $SOL from staking after nearly five years and transferred a total of 201,780 $SOL to a BitGo custodial wallet.

QAccording to the article, what does the transaction with BitGo suggest Alameda Research might be preparing to do?

AThe transaction has strengthened expectations that Alameda is preparing to sell its long-idle $SOL assets, potentially via an over-the-counter (OTC) sale through BitGo rather than a direct sale on exchanges.

QWhy are OTC trades often preferred for selling large volumes of crypto assets?

AOTC trades are preferred because executing large-scale deals directly on open markets can create sudden selling pressure and impact prices. Institutional investors and large portfolio holders often use OTC markets to avoid this.

QHow long had the transferred $SOL assets been staked before this move by Alameda?

AThe $SOL assets had been staked for approximately five years before being unlocked and transferred by Alameda Research.

QDespite the speculation of a sale, what alternative reason for the transfer is mentioned in the article?

AThe article notes that the transfer does not necessarily mean a sale is imminent, but moving the funds to a BitGo custodial wallet is being closely watched by the cryptocurrency market.

Пов'язані матеріали

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

"Tokenizing Real Estate: Rights, Risks, and the Path to Liquidity" While tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) gains traction, real estate presents unique complexities. Beyond technical token issuance, critical challenges remain: enforcing legal rights, managing the underlying physical asset, and creating genuine secondary market liquidity. This article explores these issues through OneAsset, a Dubai-based commercial real estate (CRE) tokenization platform. OneAsset moves away from simply offering asset fragmentation. Instead, it focuses on institutional-grade infrastructure, prioritizing asset quality, legal enforceability, and operational fundamentals. Each property is held in an independent, single-asset vault, backed by a legally separate Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for bankruptcy remoteness. Investors acquire tokens representing the economic rights to a specific property, with precise legal claims defined by the underlying SPV structure. OneAsset emphasizes that tokenization cannot transform a poor-quality asset. Its initial focus is on institutional investors and quality Dubai-based CRE, selected for stable tenant cash flows and a clear regulatory environment. The platform integrates compliance by design, aiming to embed investor qualification and transfer rules directly into the token architecture. A core insight is that asset fragmentation does not automatically create liquidity. True liquidity depends on the asset's inherent quality—its location, cash flow, and valuation—as well as sufficient buyer demand. The goal is not just tradability, but making real estate rights more easily priced, verified, and reallocated. Looking ahead, the article discusses the potential for "AiFi" (AI-powered finance). For AI agents to autonomously allocate capital, investment assets like real estate tokens must become truly "machine-readable." This requires a high degree of standardization in legal rights, valuations, cash flows, and compliance data—a direction OneAsset is pursuing through its structured data reporting. In conclusion, real estate tokenization is shifting from a technology narrative to a focus on asset fundamentals. Blockchain can enhance efficiency and programmability, but it cannot replace sound underwriting, property management, or legal execution. The real work begins after the asset is on-chain.

marsbit3 хв тому

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

marsbit3 хв тому

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

After more than two decades, a legal parallel has emerged. In 1998, major U.S. tobacco companies settled for $206 billion, leading to strict advertising bans and warning labels that significantly reduced smoking rates. On August 26, 2026, Meta reached a landmark settlement with U.S. attorneys general, agreeing to pay up to approximately $18 billion and implement mandatory changes to Facebook and Instagram. This historic settlement, one of the largest against a tech company, stems from allegations that Meta deliberately designed addictive features like infinite scroll and push notifications, harming youth mental health and violating child privacy laws. Facing a potential $1.4 trillion lawsuit and a series of unfavorable jury verdicts, Meta chose to settle on the eighth day of trial to avoid a catastrophic ruling. The core of the agreement is not just the financial penalty, which Meta will pay over 10 years, but a series of strict, 10-year product mandates for young users. These include a hard two-hour daily time limit (combined across apps), a default "nighttime block" from midnight to 6 AM, restricted notifications during school hours, hidden "like" counts, an optional non-algorithmic feed, and stronger age verification. An independent auditor will monitor compliance. Crucially, roughly 30% ($5.3 billion) of Meta's payment is contingent on YouTube and TikTok adopting similar measures and paying around $5 billion each. This move aims to create an industry-wide standard and prevent Meta from being competitively disadvantaged. The settlement is being likened to Big Tobacco's "tobacco moment." By legally framing addictive algorithm design as a "public nuisance," it sets a powerful precedent. Nearly 3,000 similar cases are pending against other social media giants, signaling a fundamental shift in regulatory pressure. The era where platforms could deny the addictive impact of their designs on children is effectively over.

marsbit9 хв тому

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

marsbit9 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片