Crypto.com says market maker boosts liquidity, denies trading edge on customers

cointelegraphОпубліковано о 2025-12-23Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-23

Анотація

Crypto.com is establishing an internal market-making team to support its expansion into prediction markets, a move it states is fully compliant with regulations and designed to boost liquidity. The company denies its internal team has any unfair advantage, asserting it does not get a "first look" at customer orders or proprietary data. It emphasized that all market makers operate under the same rules to ensure fairness and that proprietary trading is not a revenue source. The practice is common among competitors like Kalshi and Polymarket, which also use market makers to provide liquidity.

Cryptocurrency exchange Crypto.com is building an internal market-making team as part of its expansion into prediction markets, a move the company says is fully aligned with federal regulations and intended to improve liquidity, even as market-making in outcome-based trading continues to draw scrutiny.

Bloomberg reported Tuesday that the exchange is recruiting for a new role on its market-making desk, citing a job posting for a “quant trader” who would help buy and sell contracts tied to the outcomes of sporting events on Crypto.com’s prediction platform.

Source: Bloomberg

The report has drawn attention to the practice of exchanges facilitating trading against customer orders, a structure that can raise questions about conflicts of interest as prediction markets gain traction across both crypto and traditional finance.

In a statement to Cointelegraph, a Crypto.com spokesperson said the company’s internal trading team is fully disclosed to the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission and makes markets across its North American derivatives business.

“The bottom line for customers is [that] more competition and liquidity on the platform creates a better overall experience,” the spokesperson said, adding that internal and external market makers operate under the same rules to ensure market fairness and integrity.

“No market maker at Crypto.com gets a ‘first look’, and our internal market maker does not have access to proprietary data or customer order flow before other market makers or market participants,” the spokesperson said.

They added that Crypto.com does not rely on proprietary trading as a revenue source. “We have a simple business model providing our retail customers access to digital assets for a fee, while staying risk neutral," they said.

Related: Phantom taps Kalshi to offer regulated prediction markets in wallet

Market-making isn’t unique to Crypto.com

Crypto.com is not the only prediction-market operator to rely on market makers to support liquidity.

The Bloomberg report noted that competitors such as Kalshi and Polymarket also use professional trading companies or dedicated liquidity providers to facilitate trading on their platforms.

Kalshi, which operates a federally regulated event-contract exchange, relies on designated market makers rather than a purely peer-to-peer order book, and those arrangements have largely been public. It has been reported that quantitative trading company Susquehanna International Group has provided market-making services to Kalshi since 2024, helping supply liquidity as trading volumes surged.

Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market that drew widespread attention during the US presidential election for accurately predicting the outcome, is also building an internal market-making unit, according to Bloomberg.

Polymarket’s monthly volumes began to surge in the run-up to the 2024 US presidential election. Source: Dune

Related: DraftKings eyes crypto offerings as it expands into prediction markets

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the primary reason Crypto.com is building an internal market-making team, according to the company?

ACrypto.com states that building an internal market-making team is intended to improve liquidity and create a better overall experience for customers, and it is fully aligned with federal regulations.

QHow does Crypto.com address concerns about conflicts of interest and unfair advantages for its internal market maker?

ACrypto.com states that its internal market maker does not get a 'first look' at proprietary data or customer order flow before other market participants, and all market makers operate under the same rules to ensure fairness and integrity.

QBesides Crypto.com, which other prediction-market operators use market makers to support liquidity, as mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions that competitors such as Kalshi and Polymarket also use professional trading companies or dedicated liquidity providers to facilitate trading on their platforms.

QWhat is Crypto.com's stated business model regarding proprietary trading and revenue?

ACrypto.com states that it does not rely on proprietary trading as a revenue source and has a simple business model of providing retail customers access to digital assets for a fee while staying risk neutral.

QWhich quantitative trading company has been reported to provide market-making services to Kalshi since 2024?

AQuantitative trading company Susquehanna International Group has been reported to provide market-making services to Kalshi since 2024.

Пов'язані матеріали

AAVE Rallies 30% in a Week, Is It Back on Track?

Over the past week, the price of AAVE surged from around $70 to nearly $100, a rebound exceeding 30%. This occurred despite Aave's TVL continuing to decline following the Kelp DAO security incident. The price movement was partly driven by market rumors, first reported by CoinDesk, that Kraken was negotiating to acquire a stake in Aave. While Aave founder Stani Kulechov denied the specific terms, he confirmed discussions with multiple parties about purchasing Aave Labs' AAVE tokens. He also revealed ongoing work on Tokenomics 3.0, featuring an automated buyback mechanism, and plans to expand into securities-backed lending. Analysts remain optimistic about Aave's long-term prospects. Standard Chartered gave an extremely bullish $3,500 price target for 2030, citing DeFi revival and RWA tokenization. Grayscale offered a more conservative one-year target of $175. However, competitors like Morpho are gaining traction, with recent reports highlighting its advantages in capital efficiency and customization. Morpho also secured a massive $175 million funding round. Fundamentally, Aave maintains its dominance as the leading DeFi lending protocol. Its TVL is nearly double that of second-place Morpho and rivals the combined total of the next several competitors. Key metrics like active borrowing, total supply, and revenue significantly outpace rivals. While Aave faces challenges from newer, more flexible protocols, its deep liquidity and established position make it a preferred choice for large, yield-seeking users. The article concludes that despite setbacks, Aave's long-tested protocol merits ongoing attention in a market with increasingly scarce quality projects.

Foresight News35 хв тому

AAVE Rallies 30% in a Week, Is It Back on Track?

Foresight News35 хв тому

Real-life 'Black Mirror' Pumpfun Go: 40 Yuan to Lick Toilets, 14,000 USD for a Logo Tattoo on the Forehead

The article discusses the controversial new platform "Pumpfun Go," a bounty task platform launched by the meme coin platform Pump.fun. Its slogan is "Pay anyone to do anything." The platform allows users to anonymously post tasks with cryptocurrency rewards, which are held in escrow until completion and verification. The piece highlights extreme and disturbing tasks that have gained notoriety, such as licking a gas station toilet floor for roughly $5.63, eating live insects, getting a company logo tattooed on one's forehead for $14,000, and even a now-removed $700,000 bounty for suicide. These tasks are often linked to promoting specific meme coins by generating shocking, attention-grabbing content. While some tasks involve community-building or charity, critics, including New York Governor Kathy Hochul, condemn the platform for exploiting economic desperation and encouraging humiliating or dangerous behavior. They argue it mirrors dystopian narratives from shows like "Black Mirror" and movies like "Nerve," where online dares escalate for viewers' entertainment. Supporters and some participants counter that the platform provides much-needed income opportunities for the financially struggling. One user claimed the bounty money far exceeded his monthly salary. The article concludes by questioning the morality of a system where the wealthy pay for spectacle and the poor trade dignity for survival, reflecting a long history of public consumption of others' suffering. It suggests hope may lie in future technological abundance freeing people from such desperate choices.

marsbit59 хв тому

Real-life 'Black Mirror' Pumpfun Go: 40 Yuan to Lick Toilets, 14,000 USD for a Logo Tattoo on the Forehead

marsbit59 хв тому

Faked Trades, Clone Websites, 1105 Videos: Polymarket Under CFTC Scrutiny

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has launched a wide-ranging investigation into prediction market platform Polymarket. The probe, triggered by a Wall Street Journal report, focuses on allegations of systematic marketing fraud. The report revealed Polymarket allegedly hired dozens of student content creators to post over 1,100 videos showing fake, profitable trades on cloned websites, without disclosing the paid relationships. These videos, with over 140 million views, were pivotal to user growth. Simultaneously, the National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA) filed a lawsuit in Washington D.C., accusing Polymarket and its executives of deceptive advertising targeting college students. The suit details off-campus promotions and payments made through the CMO's personal PayPal account to influencers who failed to disclose sponsorships. The investigation places CFTC Chairman Michael Selig in a difficult position, as he has been a vocal advocate for prediction markets and is currently suing multiple states to assert federal jurisdiction over them. This case tests the CFTC's dual role as both promoter and enforcer. This marks Polymarket's second major clash with the CFTC. After a 2022 settlement and U.S. ban, it regained approval to operate in September 2025, secured a $20 billion investment, and saw its valuation soar. The current crisis, compounded by a recent $3.1 million front-end supply chain attack, represents the platform's most severe multi-front challenge since its founding.

Foresight News1 год тому

Faked Trades, Clone Websites, 1105 Videos: Polymarket Under CFTC Scrutiny

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片