Crypto Vs. Banks: Key CLARITY Act Meetings This Week And What They Could Decide

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-03-24Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-24

Анотація

Negotiations on the CLARITY Act, a key crypto market-structure bill, are nearing completion, though final language remains undisclosed. Senator Cynthia Lummis stated talks are "99% resolved" on stablecoin yields, a central issue where banks fear deposit flight and crypto firms seek viable yield options. A reported White House compromise with senators may limit yield on idle balances to address banking concerns. Crypto and banking groups are meeting with the Senate Banking Committee this week to review the draft. Unresolved areas include DeFi, token classification, and tokenization. A committee markup is anticipated in mid-to-late April.

Negotiations over the CLARITY Act — the Senate’s long‐anticipated crypto market‐structure bill — appear to be nearing a conclusion, but key details remain under wraps, and no official date has been set for a Senate Banking Committee markup.

Industry sources and reporters tracking the talks say progress has been significant, yet the bill’s final language and whether it will resolve the long‐running dispute between banks and crypto firms have not been publicly confirmed.

Banks’ Concerns Addressed

Senator Cynthia Lummis, who chairs the Senate Banking Committee’s digital assets subcommittee and has been a lead negotiator, told colleagues that talks are “99% of the way to resolution” on the thorny issue of stablecoin yield.

This signals that negotiators believe they are close to bridging a central divide: banks’ concern that yield on stablecoin deposits could prompt deposit flight and strain traditional lending, versus crypto firms’ desire for commercially viable yield options.

Reporting by Eleanor Terrett of Crypto In America added new detail to the picture. Terrett said the White House has tentatively reached a compromise with Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks, who have worked for nearly two months to hammer out language tied to the CLARITY Act.

According to Terrett, the draft reportedly acknowledges banking sector worries and would likely include measures aimed at limiting yield on idle balances. Banking sources told Terrett they do not yet know the precise contents of the text and said the provision has been kept closely held.

Senate To Hear Crypto, Banking Feedback This Week

Industry engagement with the process is continuing this week. Crypto trade association representatives are scheduled to meet with the Senate Banking Committee later Monday, while banking groups are set to review the draft text on Tuesday.

Those briefings will be critical: crypto stakeholders must decide whether the compromise language is acceptable, and banks will review whether the bill sufficiently addresses their deposit‐flight concerns.

While the draft reportedly will include a ban on yield on idle balances, other sensitive topics remain unresolved. Terrett reported that the bill still needs work on several areas, including decentralized finance (DeFi), token classification, and tokenization.

Those sections will require careful drafting to balance innovation, investor protection, and financial stability before the Banking Committee’s chair, Senator Tim Scott, can move to schedule a markup.

As NewsBTC reported last Friday, some sources suggest that a markup could occur between mid and late April, though no formal scheduling has been announced by the Banking Committee.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap’s Monday surge to $2.4 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main focus of the CLARITY Act negotiations this week?

AThe main focus is on resolving the long-running dispute between banks and crypto firms, particularly concerning stablecoin yield and addressing banks' concerns about potential deposit flight.

QAccording to Senator Cynthia Lummis, how close are negotiators to resolving the stablecoin yield issue?

ASenator Cynthia Lummis stated that negotiations are '99% of the way to resolution' on the stablecoin yield issue.

QWhich two senators did the White House tentatively reach a compromise with regarding the CLARITY Act?

AThe White House tentatively reached a compromise with Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks.

QWhat specific measure is the draft bill expected to include to address banking sector worries?

AThe draft bill is expected to include measures aimed at limiting yield on idle balances to address banking sector concerns.

QWhat are some of the unresolved topics that still need work in the CLARITY Act according to the reporting?

AAccording to the reporting, the bill still needs work on several areas including decentralized finance (DeFi), token classification, and tokenization.

Пов'язані матеріали

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit1 год тому

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit1 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit7 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit7 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手7 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手7 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片