Crypto Treasuries May Begin Selling In 2026 As ETFs Increase Pressure: Report

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-02-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-17

Анотація

Crypto prices have declined significantly from their previous highs, and a new report warns that digital asset treasuries (DATs) may be forced to start selling their holdings by 2026. These companies, which hold large amounts of cryptocurrency on their balance sheets, are facing steep paper losses due to falling token prices. If the bear market persists, they may need to liquidate assets to meet debt obligations or margin calls. Additionally, the growing popularity of cryptocurrency ETFs is increasing competitive pressure on DATs. Both offer crypto exposure, but ETFs are seen as less risky than treasury companies, which often use debt financing. Refinancing risks and potential margin calls could force DATs to sell into a declining market, creating a negative feedback loop that drives prices even lower. Analysts caution that if the current slump continues, forced sales from DATs could amplify market weakness and have ripple effects across the entire crypto ecosystem in 2026.

As crypto prices slide sharply from last year’s highs, a new warning suggests that 2026 could bring additional pressure from an unexpected source: the companies that hold large amounts of digital assets on their balance sheets.

Bitcoin (BTC) is currently trading below $70,000, roughly 50% beneath the all-time high it reached last October. With forecasts predicting a renewed bear market, analysts at The Motley Fool argue that digital asset treasuries (DATs) may soon be compelled to sell part of their crypto holdings.

Mounting Pressure On Crypto Treasury Firms

According to their assessment, falling token prices have left many of these firms sitting on steep paper losses, with some now underwater. If the downturn persists, they may need to liquidate assets to meet debt obligations or respond to margin calls.

At the same time, investors could increasingly favor cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs), adding another layer of competition and strain. The concern centers on how these treasury-focused companies financed their crypto strategies.

While all DATs hold significant digital assets, their funding structures differ. Some rely heavily on debt, while others issue equity; the method of capital raising will determine how well they can withstand a prolonged slump.

A key risk is refinancing. If credit conditions tighten or asset values continue to fall, companies may struggle to roll over debt. Leveraged positions could also trigger margin calls, potentially forcing them to sell into a declining market.

Such selling could push prices even lower, setting off a negative feedback loop across the broader crypto ecosystem. At the same time, the rapid growth of crypto ETFs is creating additional competition for digital asset treasuries.

The analysts highlight that both investment vehicles offer investors exposure to cryptocurrencies without requiring them to open accounts on exchanges or manage private keys. However, treasury companies carry more operational and financial risk than passively managed ETFs.

A Prolonged Bear Market Ahead?

While the long-term trajectory of digital assets remains uncertain, the analysts caution that 2026 could be a pivotal year for corporate crypto holders. If prices remain under pressure, forced sales from digital asset treasuries could amplify market weakness.

Such developments would not be isolated events; Motley Fool analysts assert that they could ripple across the entire ecosystem, affecting investors, related companies, and broader market sentiment.

For now, much depends on whether the current slump deepens into a prolonged bear market. Should that occur, the combination of debt burdens, refinancing risks, and intensifying ETF competition may place digital asset treasuries under significant strain — with consequences extending far beyond their own balance sheets.

The 1-D chart shows the total crypto market cap dropping toward $2.3 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the report, why might digital asset treasuries (DATs) be forced to sell their crypto holdings in 2026?

AFalling token prices have left many DATs with steep paper losses, and if the downturn persists, they may need to liquidate assets to meet debt obligations or respond to margin calls.

QWhat is a key financial risk for crypto treasury companies that could force them to sell assets in a declining market?

AA key risk is refinancing. If credit conditions tighten or asset values continue to fall, companies may struggle to roll over debt. Leveraged positions could also trigger margin calls, forcing them to sell.

QHow are cryptocurrency ETFs creating additional pressure and competition for digital asset treasuries?

AETFs offer investors exposure to cryptocurrencies without the need to open exchange accounts or manage private keys. As they grow in popularity, they provide a less risky alternative to investing directly in treasury companies, which carry more operational and financial risk.

QWhat could be the broader market consequence of forced sales from digital asset treasuries?

AForced sales could push crypto prices even lower, setting off a negative feedback loop that ripples across the entire ecosystem, affecting investors, related companies, and broader market sentiment.

QWhat factors will determine how well a digital asset treasury can withstand a prolonged crypto market slump?

ATheir funding structure will determine their resilience. Companies that rely heavily on debt are more vulnerable, whereas those that issued equity may be better positioned to handle a prolonged downturn.

Пов'язані матеріали

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

As AI-generated web traffic now surpasses human activity, the internet's foundational business models—built on human attention, browsing, and advertising—face severe disruption. AI agents crawl websites at immense scale without generating ad revenue, while AI summaries divert traffic from original content sites. In response, over 2.5 million sites are blocking AI crawlers, and protections like Cloudflare's "honeypot" traps have emerged, though advanced AI can bypass these. The collapse of traditional CAPTCHAs, which assumed machines were weaker than humans, has led to a shift toward behavioral biometrics for human verification. Companies like IBM and BioCatch now analyze unique human patterns—cursor movements, typing rhythms, keystroke dynamics, and even cognitive delays like the Stroop effect—to distinguish real users from bots. These biometric signatures are difficult to fake or alter, offering a new layer of security but raising significant privacy concerns. Two competing visions for a reliable human verification system are emerging. One, exemplified by Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin), uses centralized iris scanning to generate unique credentials, though it faces bans and criticism over unauthorized data collection. The other employs cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs, allowing users to prove they are human without revealing identity or biometric data, as advocated by Vitalik Buterin. However, decentralized approaches risk exploitation through identity renting in economically unequal regions. The central dilemma is between a scalable but privacy-invasive centralized system that permanently controls users' biometric data, and a privacy-preserving cryptographic system vulnerable to real-world economic manipulation. The author expresses a preference for the cryptographic path, arguing that despite its flaws, it avoids the irreversible biometric surveillance inherent in centralized alternatives.

Foresight News7 хв тому

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

Foresight News7 хв тому

Crypto Primary Market Investment and Financing Forward-Looking Weekly Report | Stablecoin Regulation Nears Implementation, ETF Funds Continue to Withdraw, Capital Begins Betting on Payment and Cash Flow

Crypto Market Weekly Report (Jun 1-7, 2026): Capital Shifts Focus to Payments & Cash Flow Market data indicates a significant divergence: while traditional institutional funds continue exiting via BTC and ETH ETFs (recording net outflows of $1.72B and $168M this week, respectively), stablecoin supply continues growing. This suggests capital is shifting from speculative asset allocation toward defensive positioning within on-chain liquidity, awaiting new, concrete opportunities. This trend is reflected in venture capital focus. Weekly fundraising fell 27% to $302M, with investments concentrating on infrastructure with tangible revenue potential: 1. **Stablecoin Infrastructure (28% of funding):** Projects like M0 Protocol ($35M raise) are gaining attention as regulatory clarity (e.g., the GENIUS Act) nears, shifting the focus from legitimacy to building payment and settlement networks. 2. **AI Agent Infrastructure (26%):** Investments are moving from conceptual AI Agents towards the execution and economic layers required for a functional "Agent economy." Key raises include OpenRouter ($40M) and Halliday ($20M). 3. **Real World Assets (RWA) (18%):** The search for on-chain yield and cash flow drives continued interest in RWA platforms like Ondo Finance. Security threats are evolving from smart contract exploits toward key management failures, permission control issues, and regulatory execution risks (e.g., court-ordered asset freezes). **Key Takeaways:** The investment thesis is shifting from narrative-driven bets to revenue and cash-flow-generating protocols. Future attention should be on the progression of stablecoin regulations, the commercial validation of AI Agent economies, and the performance of high-revenue protocols like derivatives platforms.

marsbit14 хв тому

Crypto Primary Market Investment and Financing Forward-Looking Weekly Report | Stablecoin Regulation Nears Implementation, ETF Funds Continue to Withdraw, Capital Begins Betting on Payment and Cash Flow

marsbit14 хв тому

Buy an NFT First to Get a Ticket? The Largest World Cup Ticket Slump in History

"Ticketing Woes for 2026 World Cup: NFT 'Right-to-Buy' and High Prices Dampen Sales" Despite anticipation for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, with 48 teams and 104 matches across North America, the tournament faces significant unsold tickets, with approximately 180,000 group-stage tickets still available for resale just before kick-off. This unexpected shortfall is attributed to FIFA's controversial new ticketing strategy, which includes an NFT-based "Right-to-Buy" (RTB) system and opaque, dynamic pricing. FIFA introduced RTBs as digital collectibles (NFTs) sold on its FIFA Collect platform. An RTB grants the holder only the right to purchase a ticket for a specific match later, not the ticket itself. This two-step process, criticized for selling "scarcity" first, saw RTBs priced from tens to hundreds of dollars, generating millions in revenue for FIFA. With many tickets remaining available on official channels, the value of these prepaid purchase rights is now being questioned. Compounding the issue are ticket prices, reported to be 2 to 4 times higher than the 2022 Qatar World Cup, and up to 7 times more for marquee matches. FIFA employed dynamic pricing, common in U.S. sports, but lacked transparency on seat availability and exact locations during sales, frustrating global fans facing high travel costs. This has drawn scrutiny from regulators in New York and New Jersey. FIFA's official resale platform also drew criticism for imposing high fees—roughly 10% on sellers and 17% on buyers, allowing FIFA to profit further from secondary market transactions. While FIFA President Gianni Infantino states over 6 million tickets have been sold, the situation highlights a potential disconnect between fan enthusiasm and willingness to pay under an aggressive commercial model.

marsbit22 хв тому

Buy an NFT First to Get a Ticket? The Largest World Cup Ticket Slump in History

marsbit22 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片