Crypto leaders join CFTC panel as U.S. pushes ‘pro-innovation’ rules

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-13Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-13

Анотація

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has formed an Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC) under the Trump Administration, comprising leaders from both crypto and traditional finance sectors. Members include executives from Coinbase, Uniswap, Ripple, Chainlink, and Solana, as well as representatives from prediction markets and major financial institutions like Nasdaq and the London Stock Exchange. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated the committee aims to develop adaptive regulations to keep pace with innovations in blockchain and AI, ensuring the agency’s rules reflect market realities. The move is seen as a shift from the previous administration’s enforcement-heavy approach. Industry leaders, including Uniswap’s Hayden Adams and Chainlink’s Sergey Nazarov, welcomed the initiative as a positive development for DeFi, tokenization, and the broader crypto ecosystem.

The Donald Trump Administration has formed a new advisory team, the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC), filled with crypto and traditional finance leaders to help drive American innovation.

On the 13th of February, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) unveiled the members of the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC).

Players from the crypto industry include Coinbase’s Brian Armstrong, Uniswap’s CEO Hayden Adams, Ripple’s Brad Garlinghouse, Chainlink Labs’ Sergey Nazarov, and Solana’s Anatoly Yakovenko, among others.

On the prediction markets segment, Polymarket founder Shayne Coplan and Kalshi’s Tarek Mansour. Additionally, leaders from sport betting platforms FanDuel and DraftKings were tapped.

On the traditional finance side, Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) CEO Frank LaSalla, London Stock Exchange CEO David Schwimmer, Nasdaq CEO Adena Friedman, and others.

CFTC’s end-game

Academic and interest group representatives are also part of the team to provide a balance on tech updates and breakthroughs. According to CFTC chair Mike Selig, this was an ‘energizing moment’ for the regulator, adding that,

“The IAC’s work will help ensure the CFTC’s decisions reflect market realities so the agency can future-proof its markets and develop clear rules of the road for the Golden Age of American financial markets.”

Selig added that the committee will help CFTC formulate adaptive regulations for new breakthroughs in blockchain and AI that are transforming financial markets. He added,

“By bringing together participants from every corner of the marketplace, the IAC will be a major asset for the Commission as we work to modernize our rules and regulations for the innovations of today and tomorrow.”

Great for DeFi and broader crypto?

It’s worth noting that Selig first signaled the move in late January, calling for ‘fit-for-purpose’ regulation of new technologies disrupting financial markets.

Interestingly, the update also comes at a crucial time for prediction markets. The regulator recently withdrew a Biden-era rule that banned event contracts tied to sports and political activities.

Selig said the move was the agency’s ‘commitment to lawful innovation,’ underscoring the pro-crypto and pro-innovation pivot under the Trump Administration.

Reacting to the latest IAC update, Uniswap’s Hayden Adams said,

“Last admin’s CFTC only wanted to talk via subpoenas and enforcement. And lots of builders on this IAC! A great sign for the future of the agency.”

Similarly, Chainlink Labs’ Nazarov echoed Adams’ enthusiasm and expected the move to be bullish for tokenization, DeFi, and crypto overall.

Final Thoughts

CFTC chair forms an advisory team to help prepare the agency to form adaptive regulations.
Crypto leaders viewed the move as positive for the industry and a U-turn from the previous administration’s enforcement actions.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the name of the new advisory committee formed by the CFTC, and what is its purpose?

AThe new advisory committee is called the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC). Its purpose is to help the CFTC drive American innovation, ensure its decisions reflect market realities, and develop adaptive regulations for new technologies like blockchain and AI.

QName at least three crypto industry leaders who are members of the newly formed CFTC committee.

AThree crypto industry leaders on the committee are Brian Armstrong (Coinbase), Hayden Adams (Uniswap), and Brad Garlinghouse (Ripple).

QAccording to CFTC Chair Mike Selig, what two key technologies is the committee tasked with helping to formulate regulations for?

AThe committee is tasked with helping to formulate regulations for blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI).

QWhat recent action did the CFTC take regarding prediction markets, and how did the chairman describe this move?

AThe CFTC withdrew a Biden-era rule that banned event contracts tied to sports and political activities. Chairman Selig described this move as a demonstration of the agency's 'commitment to lawful innovation'.

QHow did Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams characterize the difference between the current CFTC's approach and that of the previous administration?

AHayden Adams said that the previous administration's CFTC 'only wanted to talk via subpoenas and enforcement,' contrasting it with the new committee which includes many builders, calling it a 'great sign for the future of the agency.'

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit6 год тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit6 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手6 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手6 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit8 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit8 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手10 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手10 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit11 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit11 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси