Crypto Hacks Drop to $26.5M in February Amid Security Gains

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-02Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-02

Анотація

Crypto hacks and scams plummeted to a multi-year low in February, totaling approximately $26.5 million across 15 incidents. This represents a significant 69.2% decrease from January's $86 million in losses. The two largest attacks accounted for the majority: a $10 million price manipulation hack on YieldBlox’s lending pool and an $8.9 million private key exploit on IoTeX. Security firm PeckShield attributed the sharp decline to a lack of "mega-hacks" and a shift in focus due to market volatility. Analysts suggest capital is becoming more selective, rewarding protocols with stronger security, and that improved risk controls, audits, and AI-powered tools are contributing to a broader trend of enhanced crypto security.

Last month recorded the lowest level of crypto hacks and scams since March 2025, having $26.5 million stolen since February, as reported by the blockchain security company PeckShield.

Around 15 cases were reported in the month, in which two accounted for the majority of the losses, with the biggest accounting for the $10 million theft from YieldBlox’s DAO-managed lending pool through a price manipulation hack on February 21, as reported by PeckShield at X on March 1.

The second-biggest hack targeted the decentralised identity protocol IoTeX, which lost around $8.9 million to a private key exploit on Feb 21. In total, February indicates a 69.2% month-on-month fall from January, which listed more than $86 million in losses.

What Did the Spokesperson Mention?

A spokesperson from PeckShield mentioned that mega-hacks, like the $1.5 billion Bybit hack in February last year, did not inflate last month’s statistics, and market volatility resulted in a significant cooling period in exploit activity.

The spokesperson further mentioned that a sharp market correction in early February, having Bitcoin slip below $70,000, moved the focus of the industry toward institutional deleveraging and math-based sell-offs.

At the time of high-volatility periods, the tactical aim mostly shifts away from protocol exploits toward navigating market liquidity. Dominick John, a Kronos Research analyst, mentioned that the shift could also show tighter risk controls, stronger counterparty standards and amplified real-time monitoring over major venues.

He further went on, mentioning that Capital is shifting to become more selective, rewarding protocols with mature security frameworks. John mentioned losses could carry on to slip by the year as audits, monitoring, and institutional risk frameworks mature.

AI might also intensify the shift, backing automated code reviews, anomaly detection, and pre-deployment attack simulations to catch vulnerabilities earlier in the lifecycle. Crypto security is intensifying, and protocols are doubling down on audits, formal verification, and real-time monitoring.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Will AAVE Reset Monthly Momentum or Lose Steam and Remain in the Red?

TagsBybitCrypto AttackHack

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the total amount stolen in crypto hacks and scams in February, as reported by PeckShield?

A$26.5 million.

QWhich two major hacks accounted for the majority of the losses in February, and what were the amounts?

AThe $10 million theft from YieldBlox’s DAO-managed lending pool and the $8.9 million hack targeting the IoTeX protocol.

QWhat was the month-on-month percentage decrease in crypto losses from January to February?

AA 69.2% decrease.

QAccording to the spokesperson, what factor contributed to a significant cooling period in exploit activity?

AMarket volatility.

QHow might AI contribute to improving crypto security, as mentioned in the article?

ABy backing automated code reviews, anomaly detection, and pre-deployment attack simulations to catch vulnerabilities earlier.

Пов'язані матеріали

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1 год тому

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1 год тому

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit1 год тому

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片