Crypto Hack Losses Jump 46% in 2025: SlowMist Report

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2025-12-31Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-31

Анотація

In 2025, crypto hack losses surged by 46% to $2.935 billion compared to $2.013 billion in 2024, despite a significant drop in the number of incidents from 410 to 200. The DeFi sector remained the most targeted, with 126 security incidents resulting in $649 million in losses. A major hack on centralized exchange Bybit alone accounted for $1.46 billion of the total $1.809 billion lost in CEX breaches. Phishing attacks became more sophisticated and harder to detect. Notably, $387 million of the stolen funds were recovered or frozen across 18 incidents.

SlowMist, a blockchain security firm, has recently released its 2025 Blockchain Security and AML Annual Report. The report vigorously mentioned the various security challenges the crypto industry faced over the year.

As per the report, the total value stolen from crypto hacks increased by around 46% in 2025 as compared to 2024. It is important to note that crypto theft had been more destructive by the first half of this year than in 2024.

Chainalysis also released a report this year that mentioned that this year showed a significantly steeper trajectory into the end of the first half than any events that occurred in the previous years.

Till now, this year’s security incidents have resulted in $2.935 billion, which was $2.013 billion in losses in 2024. Although the number of incidents has dropped since last year, the total amount of losses increased, indicating a trend of fewer but large-scale scams.

The single incident leading to massive loss

In 2025, there were a total of 200 cases, which in 2024 stood at 410 cases. The DeFi sector was the most targeted sector, with 126 security cases, which equalled about 63% of all hacks and total losses of about $649 million. This shows a 37% and 67% decrease from last year’s incident, which stood at 339, resulting in $1.029 billion.

At the same time, centralised exchange (CEX) platforms noted 22 incidents accounting for $1.809 billion in losses as a result of the Bybit hack. This was the single incident that resulted in a massive loss of $1.46 billion.

However, phishing was one of the most active schemes evolving in 2025, as per the SlowMist. Also, the scams have become very difficult to detect, as malicious actors are not relying on a single method of attack to deceive victims.

Furthermore, there were 18 incidents in this year in which the lost funds were recovered or frozen. These cases resulted in taking the total stolen funds to $1.95 billion, of which around $387 million was successfully returned or frozen.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

BitMine Expands ETH Treasury With $352M Staking Push

TagsCrypto HackHackphishing

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the SlowMist report, what was the percentage increase in the total value stolen from crypto hacks in 2025 compared to 2024?

AThe total value stolen from crypto hacks increased by around 46% in 2025 compared to 2024.

QWhich sector was the most targeted by security incidents in 2025, and what percentage of all hacks did it represent?

AThe DeFi sector was the most targeted, representing about 63% of all hacks.

QWhat was the single largest security incident mentioned in the report and how much was lost in that event?

AThe single largest incident was the Bybit hack, which resulted in a massive loss of $1.46 billion.

QDespite a decrease in the number of incidents, why did the total amount of losses increase in 2025?

AThe total amount of losses increased because the industry saw a trend of fewer but large-scale scams.

QHow much in stolen funds was successfully recovered or frozen in 2025 according to the report?

AApproximately $387 million in stolen funds was successfully returned or frozen in 2025.

Пов'язані матеріали

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手26 хв тому

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手26 хв тому

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手49 хв тому

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手49 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片