Crypto Bill Faces a New Challenge, Delaying its Implementation

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-05

Анотація

The crypto bill, known as the Clarity Act, faces new challenges that could delay its implementation until at least July 2026. Banks and crypto firms remain opposed, with banks warning of potential deposit flight and risks to financial stability, while crypto companies support the bill for regulatory clarity and the ability to offer yield-bearing products. Despite criticism from former President Trump toward banks, the American Bankers Association has offered suggestions for the bill's advancement. In the Senate, Democrats are seeking additional conditions, including a ban on officials profiting from crypto and stricter anti-money laundering rules. The ongoing conflict in Iran and the approaching 2026 mid-term elections further complicate progress, though some remain optimistic about a potential agreement.

The crypto bill now has a new challenge, not overcoming the same, which could delay its implementation for a longer time. Banks and crypto firms are still on opposite sides despite the intervention of the White House. A maximum stretch has been drawn for July 2026 because months after that could see more focus on the mid-term election.

Challenge for the Crypto Bill

The Clarity Act essentially aims to state regulations for crypto firms more effectively; however, banks have penned a line to obstruct its implementation. Banks have flagged a possibility of deposit flight. This could affect their lending capacity, which is then expected to impact the macro economic condition of the nation.

US President Donald Trump has criticized banks by saying that they were trying to undermine the bill. Trump, in a social media post, called it a powerful crypto agenda and said that they would not allow banks to undermine it.

The American Bankers Association has sought a precautionary move to prevent deterrence to economic growth and financial stability. It has, reportedly, offered constructive suggestions for the advancement of the bill.

Support from Crypto Giants

Needless to say, crypto giants are in support of the crypto bill for two reasons. They have operated in gray areas for a long time, and they are still on the lookout to reward/recruit users in their ecosystem. The Clarity Bill underlines regulations that could help promote adoption of cryptocurrencies.

Another reason is that it enables crypto firms to extend yield-bearing products to users. Companies have reportedly spent approximately $119 million to support pro-crypto candidates in 2024, and are hoping to get a favorable result by July 2026.

Challenges in the Senate

Democrats have sought additional conditions before giving a green light. The crypto bill has to be supported by a minimum of seven democrats. The group has asked for a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules.

The ongoing conflict in Iran is also making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill, according to a statement by Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel.

Many anticipate that no discussion or no progress by July 2026 could delay the bill for a long time, as discussions would then shift to the mid-term election, which is scheduled to happen in November 2026.

Nevertheless, Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger has signalled that the path to a workable agreement is clearer than it was before.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

From Bear Trap to Breakout? Ethereum (ETH) Tests a Crucial Momentum Shift After a 7% Jump

TagsCrypto Bill

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main reason for the potential delay in the implementation of the crypto bill?

AThe main reason for the potential delay is a new challenge that the bill is facing, with banks and crypto firms remaining on opposite sides despite White House intervention. Furthermore, the focus is expected to shift to the mid-term elections after July 2026, which could postpone the bill for a longer time.

QWhy are banks opposing the Clarity Act for crypto regulations?

ABanks are opposing the Clarity Act because they have flagged the possibility of deposit flight, which could affect their lending capacity and subsequently impact the nation's macroeconomic condition.

QHow have crypto giants shown their support for the crypto bill?

ACrypto giants support the bill because it provides regulatory clarity after they have operated in gray areas for a long time, and it enables them to extend yield-bearing products to users. They have also spent approximately $119 million in 2024 to support pro-crypto candidates.

QWhat additional conditions have Democrats requested before supporting the crypto bill?

ADemocrats have requested a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules before giving their support to the bill.

QAccording to the article, what external event is making it difficult to discuss the crypto bill?

AAccording to Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel, the ongoing conflict in Iran is making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill.

Пов'язані матеріали

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru28 хв тому

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru28 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片