Crypto Betting Giant Polymarket Faces Backlash After Users Harass A Reporter

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-03-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-17

Polymarket, the largest crypto prediction market in the world, is under fire after bettors allegedly sent death threats to Times of Israel military reporter Emanuel Fabian.

A Bombing Report Turned Into A Bombing Of Threats

A routine war report from Emanuel Fabian for The Times of Israel on Monday triggered a bombarding of harrasment for the journalist. After reporting that an Iranian ballistic missile “struck an open area” near Beit Shemesh on March 10, he was bombarded with messages, including explicit death threats, urging him to rewrite the article as “intercepted fragments”, claims WuBlockchain.

More than $14 million were bet on whether Iran would strike Israel on that exact date, with rules stating that intercepted missiles would not count as a “Yes” result. Bettors contacted Fabian via email and WhatsApp, in some cases revealing knowledge of his home and family, and even offering bribes in exchange for edits before escalating to threats. According to Binance Square, one bettor claimed Fabian’s wording cost them around $900,000, and threatened the journalist with “settling” him for the same amount if he didn’t change his report.

A photo taken on March 16, 2026, shows a bet on Polymarket titled ‘Iran strikes Israel on...?’ Source: Emanuel Fabian for The Israel Times.

Clarifying The Facts

Fabian defended himself citing IDF information and footage of the blast, arguing that the explosion matched a full warhead detonation, not small interceptor debris:

I told Aviv that, from what I know from the Israeli military, the impact outside Beit Shemesh was indeed a missile warhead and not just fragments. I added: “The footage also shows a massive explosion of hundreds of kilograms of explosives from the warhead. Normally, a fragment does not produce such an explosion.”

Ironically enough, the IDF later confirmed that the missile which exploded in an open area outside Beit Shemesh had not been intercepted, with Fabian’s own reporting that “one missile struck an open area just outside Beit Shemesh” treats it as a direct hit, not debris from an interceptor.

Enraged Polymarket bettors, of course, didn’t take the clarification into account.

Another “Crypto Degen Casino” Accusation

Fabian echoed accusations of Polymarket “being plagued by manipulation and insider trading”. This is not the first time this week that Polymarket is accused of insider trading: just yesterday, Argentinian authorities ordered a full national ban of Polymarket after it “predicted” inflation data back in February.

Polymarket responded condemning the behavior, said it had banned the involved accounts, and pledged to hand over identifying information to law‐enforcement agencies:

Polymarket condemns the harassment and threats directed at Emanuel Fabian, or anyone else for that matter. This behavior violates our terms of service and has no place on our platform or anywhere else.

This episode follows earlier concerns around alleged insider trading on Iran‐strike markets and controversial resolutions on other high‐stakes political bets, raising fresh questions about governance, ethics, and oracles in crypto prediction markets.

BTC’s price is on the highs $73k on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

Пов'язані питання

QWhat event triggered the harassment against Times of Israel reporter Emanuel Fabian by Polymarket bettors?

AEmanuel Fabian's report that an Iranian ballistic missile 'struck an open area' near Beit Shemesh on March 10, 2026, which contradicted the betting market's rule that intercepted missiles would not count as a 'Yes' result for the bet on whether Iran would strike Israel.

QHow did some Polymarket bettors escalate their actions beyond mere communication?

AThey sent explicit death threats, revealed knowledge of Fabian's home and family, offered bribes for edits to his report, and one bettor threatened to 'settle' him for $900,000—the amount they claimed to have lost due to his wording.

QWhat was Polymarket's official response to the harassment incident?

APolymarket condemned the harassment and threats, stated that such behavior violates their Terms of Service, banned the accounts of those involved, and pledged to hand over their identifying information to law-enforcement agencies.

QWhy was Fabian's reporting significant to the Polymarket bet on Iran striking Israel?

AThe rules of the bet specified that intercepted missiles would not count as a 'Yes' result. Fabian's report that a missile 'struck an open area' was interpreted as a direct hit (a 'Yes'), costing bettors who had wagered 'No' significant amounts, with one individual claiming a loss of around $900,000.

QWhat broader accusations has Polymarket faced recently, according to the article?

APolymarket has been accused of being 'plagued by manipulation and insider trading,' including a recent incident where Argentinian authorities ordered a national ban after it allegedly 'predicted' inflation data in February, raising concerns about governance and ethics in crypto prediction markets.

Пов'язані матеріали

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru5 год тому

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru5 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片