"Criminal Offense": Deputy Declares Hunt for "Spider-Man"

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-25Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-25

Анотація

Russian State Duma deputy Elena Drapeko has called on the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD) to intervene against the illegal screening of foreign films, specifically citing "Spider-Man: A New Day," in Russian cinemas. These screenings occur without a distribution certificate or rights-holder consent under a scheme where tickets are sold for certified short films but audiences are shown the major unauthorized release beforehand. The film reportedly earned nearly 900 million rubles in its first unofficial weekend. Drapeko labeled the practice illegal entrepreneurship and a criminally punishable act, urging the Ministry of Culture to use its subordinate organizations to monitor such shows and pass information to law enforcement. The scheme bypasses the Unified Automated Information System (EAIS) for ticket sales, making official tracking impossible; estimates rely on discrepancies between overall box office figures and EAIS data. Potential consequences for violators include criminal liability (for damages over 500,000 rubles), administrative fines, and civil lawsuits from rights-holders. The situation reflects a broader, government-acknowledged trend in the shadow film distribution market, driven by factors like high official ticket prices and a lack of Hollywood releases, which competes directly with domestic cinema revenue.

Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Culture Elena Drapeko believes that the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD) should intervene in the situation with screenings of foreign films in Russian cinemas without a distribution certificate and the consent of rights holders. She stated this in a conversation with NSN on August 25. This concerns, in particular, the film "Spider-Man: A New Day," which is being shown as part of pre-screening service.

The deputy gave the exact wording: "I think the MVD should intervene in this situation, since we are talking about illegal entrepreneurship. This is a criminal offense. The MVD should track this situation. The Ministry of Culture can monitor what is happening through its subordinate organizations. They do not transmit data to the EAIS because the film is being distributed illegally. This information can quite easily be forwarded to law enforcement agencies."

EAIS is the Unified Automated Information System for accounting cinema ticket sales, where cinemas are required to submit data for every officially sold ticket.

How the scheme works

Tickets are formally sold for short films with a valid distribution certificate—for example, for "Farewell." Before the screening of such a short film, a new foreign release that has not officially been distributed in Russia is shown in the auditorium.

According to NSN data, "Spider-Man: A New Day" collected almost 900 million rubles on its first weekend in unofficial distribution. Since the film is shown outside the official system, box office receipts are estimated by the difference between the cinemas' overall gross indicators and the data that enters the EAIS.

What threatens violators

  • Criminal liability under Article 146 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation — in case of damage exceeding 500,000 rubles
  • Administrative liability — in less significant cases
  • Civil liability to rights holders

Drapeko believes that the Ministry of Culture is capable of tracking such screenings through its subordinate organizations and transferring the data to law enforcement agencies. For now, information about the scale of shadow distribution comes mainly from calculations based on box office receipts, not from the official EAIS statistics.

AI Opinion

From the point of view of machine data analysis, the situation with "Spider-Man" is not an isolated case, but part of a trend that the state has been recording for a year. Back in August 2025, the cabinet of ministers approved a decision to empower the Ministry of Culture to investigate shadow film distribution—this shows that the topic has been discussed at the government level for much longer than the story of one film.

The macroeconomic connection here is obvious: the higher the prices for official tickets and the rarer Hollywood premieres are, the more attractive the gray scheme is for the cinemas themselves—these box office receipts directly compete with the distribution of domestic films. A technical nuance that remains off-screen: the EAIS system physically does not record such screenings, so damage assessment is based on the difference in box office indicators, not on direct data from the registry. Whether this initiative will remain declarative or turn into real criminal cases is a question, the answer to which will appear in the coming months.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the primary criminal accusation made by the deputy against cinemas showing films like 'Spider-Man: New Day'?

AThe deputy, Elena Drapeko, primarily accuses the cinemas of engaging in illegal entrepreneurship, which is a criminally punishable act. This involves selling tickets for films shown without a distribution certificate and without the consent of the rights holders.

QWhat specific technical system do cinemas bypass by illegally showing films like the new Spider-Man movie?

ACinemas bypass the EACS, the Unified Automated Information System for accounting ticket sales in cinemas. They are legally required to submit data on every officially sold ticket to this system, which they avoid by not reporting these illegal screenings.

QHow do the cinemas technically justify the sale of tickets for an unofficial film screening?

AFormally, they sell tickets for a short film that has a valid distribution certificate, such as 'Proshchanie' (Farewell). Before showing this short film, they screen the unofficial foreign blockbuster (like the new Spider-Man) as part of the pre-feature service.

QWhat are the potential legal consequences for cinemas involved in this scheme, according to the article?

AThe potential consequences include: 1) Criminal liability under Article 146 of the Criminal Code (for damages exceeding 500,000 rubles). 2) Administrative liability for less significant cases. 3) Civil liability to the rights holders of the films.

QAccording to the AI analysis section, what macroeconomic factors make this 'gray scheme' attractive to cinemas?

AAccording to the AI analysis, the scheme becomes more attractive when prices for official tickets are higher and when Hollywood premieres are less frequent. These unofficial screenings directly compete with the box office revenue of domestic films.

Пов'язані матеріали

BPI: Digital Gold Least Popular Bitcoin Narrative, as Implementation Methods Defy Concepts

A national study by the Bitcoin Policy Institute (BPI) reveals that the "digital gold" narrative for Bitcoin holds little appeal for everyday Americans. The research, conducted with Cygnal and Neighborhood Bitcoin, involved surveys and focus groups with registered voters. Key barriers to adoption included concerns over control of the asset, security, accessibility, and ease of use. Messaging focused on personal control (e.g., "you decide how much") or Bitcoin as "freedom money" (savings that can't be frozen by banks or governments) resonated much more strongly than the "digital gold" concept. The study also found potential buyers are more influenced by stories from peers like friends, family, or financial advisors than by abstract narratives. After exposure to effective messages, the share of those "extremely" or "very" interested in owning Bitcoin rose from 19% to 24%. A separate Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland research paper analyzed household data from 2018-2025. It found that expectations of Bitcoin's returns were a stronger driver of ownership than all demographic factors combined. For example, in 2021, Bitcoin holders expected a 22% annual return versus just 7% for non-holders. An experiment in 2025 showed that informing participants about Bitcoin's past performance (14.3% return) increased their planned crypto investments by 47% and raised their likelihood of purchasing by 23%. U.S. household crypto ownership grew from under 2% in 2018 to about 12% in 2025.

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

BPI: Digital Gold Least Popular Bitcoin Narrative, as Implementation Methods Defy Concepts

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片