‘Congress must pass the Clarity Act’ – U.S. Treasury Secretary’s plea decoded

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-04-09Востаннє оновлено о 2026-04-09

Анотація

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urges Congress to pass the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, arguing that clear federal rules are essential to prevent the relocation of crypto development to jurisdictions like Abu Dhabi and Singapore. He warns that regulatory uncertainty in the U.S. makes the risks of operating there outweigh the benefits. The call is supported by Senator Cynthia Lummis, who believes the act would serve as a "safe harbor" for innovation. However, prediction market Polymarket indicates the odds of the bill passing by 2026 have recently dropped to 57%. Despite this, key industry figures, including Coinbase's Chief Policy Officer, express confidence that legislative progress will be made.

The discussion around the CLARITY Act is intensifying day by day, and in a recent turn of events, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also stepped in.

Urging Congress, Secretary Bessent has demanded the passage of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. Introduced in 2025, the bill is still finding common ground with both the crypto industry and the banking community, but consensus remains elusive.

Remarking on the same, Bessent said,

Congress must pass the Clarity Act. Senate floor time is scarce, and now is the time to act.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s point of argument

As reported by The Wall Street Journal, the Secretary drew comparisons with other countries, calling for clear federal rules for digital assets. This, in turn, he believes, would enable widespread developments and efficient investment, crucial for the largest economy by nominal GDP to prevail.

Comparing the U.S. with other countries, Bessent added,

A growing share of crypto development relocated to places ​with clear rules, such as Abu Dhabi and Singapore. Abroad, firms knew ​when and how to register, what standards to meet, and how to operate.

Highlighting the risks in the U.S., he summed it up best when he said,

The benefits of domiciling in the U.S. rarely outweighed the risks.

Needless to say, this isn’t the first time Bessent has stepped in to highlight the importance of clear rules in the digital assets space. Back in February, he had underlined that the bill would provide “great comfort to the market” in times of volatility.

Market conditions and others in support

Echoing similar sentiments, Senator Cynthia Lummis also noted,

We have the Administration, the momentum, and we’ve made bipartisan progress.

Lummis believes that the law is a one-pot solution for “developers, validators, and node operators.” And, once approved, the Act would work as “a safe harbor” to keep innovations anchored in the U.S.

All this comes on the heels of the crypto market fluctuating between $2 trillion and $3 trillion – thanks to increased volatility.

Polymarket odds

Meanwhile, the Polymarket odds for the passage of the CLARITY Act stood at 57% at the time of publication. However, if looked at carefully, the odds have dropped by 9% from their previous high, seen just weeks ago.

Source: Polymarket

At the same time, Coinbase’s Chief Policy Officer (CPO) also added to the ongoing demand when he noted,

Source: X

This marks an interesting plot twist as Coinbase had recently stepped back from a recent compromise met on the CLARITY Act.

However, after the subtle threats between the White House and Coinbase, Coinbase’s CLO, Paul Grewal, turned bullish on the Act and put it best when he noted,

I’m very confident we’re going to see progress.

What’s more?

Additionally, a new report from the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers also highlighted that letting stablecoins offer yield isn’t a major threat to banks.

Thus, with so much optimism and understanding, it remains to be seen whether the CLARITY Act will be approved this year or get locked up in legislative headwinds.


Final Summary

  • The discussions around the CLARITY Act are heating up with Secretary Bessent now urging Congress to pass the Act.
  • Polymarket odds drop below 60%, adding more uncertainty to the passage of the bill by 2026.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main demand made by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in the article?

AScott Bessent demanded that Congress pass the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act to establish clear federal rules for digital assets.

QAccording to Bessent, why are some crypto firms relocating to places like Abu Dhabi and Singapore?

ABecause these locations have clear rules, where firms know when and how to register, what standards to meet, and how to operate.

QWhat are the current Polymarket odds for the passage of the CLARITY Act, and how have they changed recently?

AThe Polymarket odds stand at 57%, which is a 9% drop from their previous high seen just weeks ago.

QWhich U.S. Senator expressed support for the CLARITY Act, and what did they call it?

ASenator Cynthia Lummis expressed support, calling the Act a 'one-pot solution' for developers, validators, and node operators, and a 'safe harbor' to keep innovations in the U.S.

QWhat was the stance of Coinbase's Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, on the CLARITY Act after recent developments?

APaul Grewal turned bullish on the Act and expressed confidence, stating, 'I’m very confident we’re going to see progress.'

Пов'язані матеріали

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

Last Friday, the U.S. Commerce Department issued an enforcement letter that forced Anthropic to take its two most advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. The stated reason was unspecified national security concerns, initially linked to potential "jailbreaks" of the models' safeguards. However, new details suggest the action stemmed more from a deteriorating relationship between the Trump administration and Anthropic, rather than a genuine technical threat. According to reports, the government cited a little-known export control regulation, compelling Anthropic to block access for all non-U.S. persons, including its own international employees. The company complied, shutting down the models without a court order or specific technical details from the government. Cybersecurity expert Katie Moussouris revealed she was privately shown a research paper detailing a potential safeguard bypass in Fable 5. She argued the described method was minor and did not warrant an export ban, stating that attempts to "fix" it would only weaken the model's defensive capabilities. Moussouris and other experts have since called for the order to be revoked, warning it dangerously removes advanced cybersecurity tools from U.S. defenders. Analysts like Justin Hendrix suggest the move appears retaliatory and sets a dangerous precedent, signaling that the U.S. government can unilaterally shut down a tech company's products. The incident has raised concerns about the reliability of American AI and the potential for political interference in the tech industry, serving as a warning to the broader sector.

marsbit5 хв тому

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

marsbit5 хв тому

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

In his latest notes, Ray Dalio addresses a critical question for investors amid the AI-driven stock market surge: how should one allocate assets during a transformative technological revolution? Dalio emphasizes that technological advancement does not automatically make related stocks attractive. Historical tech cycles—marked by excitement, crowding, volatility, and eventual shakeouts—show that even long-term winners like Microsoft and Apple experienced severe drawdowns. Today's AI sector faces similar uncertainties: overinvestment, intensifying competition, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan's chip supply), tax policy shifts, anti-AI sentiment, and potential disruption from future technologies like quantum computing. Dalio's core argument focuses on the highly concentrated market structure, where a few tech giants dominate major indices. He warns investors against unknowingly holding concentrated, correlated exposures. Instead of chasing a handful of AI leaders, he advocates for a robust, diversified portfolio of 15 or more high-quality, uncorrelated investments, risk-balanced to match an investor's volatility tolerance. Mathematically, such diversification significantly improves the risk-return ratio—for example, holding 15 uncorrelated assets can boost the ratio by over four times compared to a single concentrated bet. Dalio cautions that future equity returns appear low, with his bubble indicator suggesting real returns could be negative over the next 5-10 years. He stresses that knowing what you don't know is as important as knowing what you do. In an environment of high uncertainty and concentration, avoiding large, concentrated bets on AI stocks is prudent. The optimal strategy is disciplined diversification—the "holy grail" of investing—to navigate this technologically driven cycle with lower risk and comparable or better returns.

marsbit9 хв тому

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

marsbit9 хв тому

The World Cup has only been played for a few days, but some AI prediction models have already been crowned as oracles, while others have stumbled badly.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup has sparked significant interest not only on the pitch but also in AI-driven match prediction. Major models like Qwen, Copilot, and ChatGPT are being used to forecast outcomes, scores, upsets, red cards, and key player performances. Qwen gained early attention by accurately predicting Mexico's 2-0 win over South Africa (including a red card risk) and South Korea's 2-1 victory over the Czech Republic in the opening matches. Copilot's pre-tournament predictions had notable successes, such as correctly calling the Mexico 2-0 scoreline, South Korea's 2-1 win, and Brazil's 1-1 draw with Morocco. However, it also had clear misses, failing to predict upsets like Australia's 2-0 win over Turkey or Switzerland's draw with Qatar. ChatGPT provided detailed analytical reasoning, correctly predicting Mexico's 2-0 win, but its full-tournament predictions tended to favor favorites, missing several underdog results and draws. Tests pitting multiple models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Claude) against the same match, like Mexico vs. South Africa, showed varying predictions, with only some hitting the exact score. In summary, while AI models like Qwen have shown promising early results in specific match details, and others have had isolated successes, they collectively struggle to consistently identify upsets and underdog performances. AI is becoming an additional reference tool for prediction markets but is far from a definitive source.

marsbit9 хв тому

The World Cup has only been played for a few days, but some AI prediction models have already been crowned as oracles, while others have stumbled badly.

marsbit9 хв тому

Missed Out on SpaceX's IPO? Take a Look at SpaceX's Complete Supply Chain

SpaceX is now public, but its high valuation and losses may deter some investors. However, the real opportunity, as seen with Apple, Tesla, and Nvidia, may lie in its extensive supply chain. SpaceX, funded primarily by its profitable Starlink service, spends hundreds of billions annually on components for its rockets, satellites, and planned orbital AI data centers, creating significant revenue streams for suppliers. Key suppliers are categorized by their indispensability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like **NVIDIA** (GPUs for AI supercomputers), **Eutelsat (SATS)** (spectrum rights), **Filtronic** (millimeter-wave amplifiers), **Materion (MTRN)** (beryllium alloys), and **STMicroelectronics (STM)** (phased array chips). The second category comprises suppliers costly to replace due to long certification cycles or deep integration, such as **Honeywell (HON)** (flight controls), **Carpenter Technology (CRS)** (specialty steel), **Hexcel (HXL)** (carbon fiber), **Broadcom (AVGO)** (data switching), and **Linde** (industrial gases). The third group involves high-volume, cost-critical manufacturers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Major players here include Taiwanese contract manufacturer **Wistron NeWeb (6285)** and several Chinese-listed firms: **Sunway Communication (300136)**, **Parker Advanced Materials (605123)**, **Western Superconducting (002149)**, and **Yingliu Co., Ltd. (603308)**. Other niche providers include **Tianyin Electromechanical**, **Tongyu Communication**, **Trimble (TRMB)**, **Astronics (ATRO)**, and **CTSH**. The timing is now relevant because: 1) SpaceX's procurement is accelerating with plans for 100 launches in 2026, 30 million Starlink terminals, and orbital data centers. 2) Its IPO has brought unprecedented transparency to its supply chain. 3) This phase mirrors early days of the Tesla supply chain boom. The investment thesis shifts from betting on SpaceX's stock to betting on the steady, order-book-driven revenues of its essential suppliers. Risks remain, such as commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, and technological shifts, but the supply chain offers a potentially less speculative path to participate in SpaceX's growth.

marsbit27 хв тому

Missed Out on SpaceX's IPO? Take a Look at SpaceX's Complete Supply Chain

marsbit27 хв тому

Jane Street: The Most Powerful Behind-the-Scenes Operator in the Crypto Industry

Jane Street: Crypto's Most Powerful Behind-the-Scenes Operator A recent 13F filing revealed Jane Street, the secretive Wall Street quant giant, drastically reduced its Bitcoin ETF holdings while increasing stakes in Ethereum ETFs. This move highlights its role not as a directional investor, but as a critical infrastructure player extracting "tolls" from crypto's institutionalization. The firm, founded in 2000 and famously lacking a CEO, has systematically embedded itself across crypto markets. It acts as a key Authorized Participant (AP) and market maker for major Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, profiting from arbitrage between ETF shares and underlying assets. Its approach combines quantitative prowess with a willingness to hold positions for structural arbitrage, differing from pure high-frequency traders. Jane Street faces allegations related to the 2022 Terra (LUNA) collapse. A lawsuit claims it used non-public information to withdraw $85 million in UST minutes before a critical withdrawal by Terraform Labs, allegedly exacerbating the crash and avoiding over $200 million in losses. The company denies the claims. Further indicating its reach, a wallet suspected to be operated by Jane Street ("JaneStreetIndia") was identified on the prediction market Polymarket. This bot executed over 11,000 high-frequency trades on short-term crypto price movements with a near-perfect win rate, showcasing a套利 strategy divorced from traditional prediction. Beyond trading, Jane Street holds equity in crypto infrastructure like Kraken, 1inch, and Arbitrum, and mining stocks. Its strategy is clear: avoid betting on winners, but secure a position in the market's essential plumbing. By becoming a ubiquitous part of the liquidity infrastructure—from ETFs to OTC trading and potentially链上 markets—Jane Street operates as a market force itself, raising questions about whether crypto's decentralized,散户-friendly alpha is being permanently eroded by traditional finance's most sophisticated players.

Foresight News30 хв тому

Jane Street: The Most Powerful Behind-the-Scenes Operator in the Crypto Industry

Foresight News30 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片