CoinQuant Introduces Trading Infrastructure for the Agent Economy

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-05-26Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-26

Анотація

CoinQuant, an AI-powered no-code trading platform with over 15,000 users, is expanding its infrastructure to serve the emerging "agent economy." The company is introducing a unified trading intelligence architecture designed for both human traders and autonomous AI agents. This system acts as a trust layer, ensuring all trading strategies—whether human-created or AI-generated—undergo rigorous validation, backtesting, and risk analysis before live deployment. The core of the platform is an intelligence engine that combines institutional-grade backtesting, structured market data, AI optimization, and a proprietary Domain Expert system. Human traders interact via a natural language interface, while AI agents connect through APIs. Every validated strategy contributes to an anonymized aggregate intelligence layer. CoinQuant plans to launch an automated execution layer on HyperLiquid and is currently raising a $3 million Seed round to scale its product and infrastructure, including the development of HYDRA, a hierarchical multi-agent architecture. The company aims to become the foundational intelligence backbone for algorithmic trading in the agent-driven financial era.

The agent economy is reshaping financial markets. Open-source agent frameworks are accelerating autonomous financial activity, with AI agents increasingly executing trades, managing portfolios, and interacting directly with exchanges. Yet the financial infrastructure supporting this shift has not evolved at the same pace.

CoinQuant, the AI-powered no-code trading platform that has attracted over 15,000 users since launch, today announces its expansion into a unified trading intelligence architecture built for both human traders and autonomous AI agents.

“Autonomous trading is no longer theoretical. It is already happening. The next phase requires structured validation, disciplined risk management, and intelligence infrastructure. That is what CoinQuant delivers,” said Maan Ftouni, Founder and CEO of CoinQuant.

The trust layer for autonomous AI agents

As AI agents increasingly connect directly to exchanges and wallets, many rely on raw APIs without structured backtesting, risk analysis, or validated data pipelines. CoinQuant introduces a structured intelligence layer between trading intent and live capital deployment.

No strategy goes live unvalidated, whether built by a human or generated autonomously. Backtesting, risk metrics, and parameter optimization are embedded directly into the workflow, ensuring capital is deployed only after systematic evaluation.

From no-code platform to trading intelligence architecture

CoinQuant’s expansion reflects the evolution of its core engine. At the center of the platform is a unified intelligence system combining institutional-grade backtesting, structured market data from providers including Kaiko and Financial Modeling Prep, AI-powered optimization, and CoinQuant’s proprietary Domain Expert system.

Human traders interact through a natural language interface that allows them to describe, test, optimize, and deploy strategies without writing code. AI agents connect programmatically through API and MCP integrations to validate strategies and access structured data at scale.

The interface is only the surface. The intelligence engine beneath it is the product.

One engine, two growth vectors

This expansion represents a natural extension of CoinQuant’s business model. The platform’s growing base of over 15,000 traders validates product-market fit and generates structured strategy intelligence. The agent interface multiplies that value through high-volume programmatic validation and automation workflows.

Every strategy built, tested, and deployed contributes to an anonymized aggregated intelligence layer, creating a proprietary dataset mapping trading intent to logic, validation metrics, and performance outcomes across market conditions.

“The same engine that powers a trader’s first backtest can validate hundreds of strategies for autonomous systems in parallel. We are building one intelligence foundation for both humans and AI agents,” Ftouni added.

Automation layer launching next

CoinQuant is preparing to launch its automated strategy execution layer on HyperLiquid as its second major revenue stream.

The automation layer will enable validated strategies to transition seamlessly from backtest to live deployment within the same intelligence framework.

Raising $3 million to scale

CoinQuant is currently raising a $3 million Seed round to support product development, infrastructure scaling, and global expansion. The company is also developing HYDRA, a hierarchical multi-agent architecture designed for advanced research, risk modeling, and strategy optimization.

With over 15,000 users validating demand for structured trading intelligence, CoinQuant aims to become the intelligence backbone of algorithmic trading in the agent-driven financial era.

About CoinQuant

CoinQuant is an AI trading platform that enables traders and AI agents to build, validate, optimize, and automate trading strategies using natural language. Headquartered in Dubai, CoinQuant integrates with major exchanges and institutional data providers to deliver professional-grade trading infrastructure to a global community.

Websitehttps://coinquant.ai
Xhttps://x.com/CoinQuantX
Discordhttps://discord.gg/StNxg33z
Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/coinquant.ai/
TikTokhttps://www.tiktok.com/@coinquant.ai
LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/coinquant

Media contact:

Nada Ali
Marketing@coinquant.ai

Disclaimer: TheNewsCrypto does not endorse any content on this page. The content depicted in this Press Release does not represent any investment advice. TheNewsCrypto recommends our readers to make decisions based on their own research. TheNewsCrypto is not accountable for any damage or loss related to content, products, or services stated in this Press Release.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core challenge that CoinQuant's new trading infrastructure aims to address for the agent economy?

AIt addresses the lag in financial infrastructure evolution, which has not kept pace with the rapid growth of autonomous AI agents in trading. It aims to provide structured validation, disciplined risk management, and intelligence infrastructure that are currently missing when AI agents connect directly to exchanges.

QWhat are the two primary user groups or growth vectors for CoinQuant's unified trading intelligence architecture?

AThe two primary user groups are human traders and autonomous AI agents. Human traders use the natural language interface, while AI agents connect programmatically via API and MCP integrations. Both groups utilize the same underlying intelligence engine.

QAccording to the article, what is the specific function of the intelligence layer CoinQuant introduces for autonomous AI agents?

AThe intelligence layer acts as a structured 'trust layer' between trading intent and live capital deployment. It enforces mandatory backtesting, risk analysis, and parameter optimization for all strategies—human or AI-generated—before they can go live, ensuring systematic evaluation.

QWhat are the two main components CoinQuant is developing or launching with the $3 million Seed funding, as mentioned in the article?

AThe two main components are: 1) The automated strategy execution layer launching next on HyperLiquid as a new revenue stream. 2) HYDRA, a hierarchical multi-agent architecture designed for advanced research, risk modeling, and strategy optimization.

QHow does CoinQuant's platform benefit from the strategies created by its user base?

AEvery strategy built, tested, and deployed contributes to an anonymized, aggregated intelligence layer. This creates a proprietary dataset that maps trading intent to logic, validation metrics, and performance outcomes across market conditions, enhancing the platform's core intelligence foundation.

Пов'язані матеріали

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit14 хв тому

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit14 хв тому

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

NVIDIA's investment strategy operates through a "three-track architecture," not just its NVentures venture arm. Corporate Development handles massive strategic bets (e.g., $30B in OpenAI, $10B in Anthropic, $20B in Synopsys). NVentures, a small team, focuses on early-stage, financial investments across sectors like quantum computing (Alice & Bob, PsiQuantum), AI infrastructure (OpenRouter, Tensormesh), and biotech. The NVIDIA Inception accelerator provides non-monetary support. This system allows NVIDIA to nurture startups and lock in strategic partners, creating a vast AI ecosystem. This aggressive capital deployment has drawn scrutiny. Critics like Michael Burry and EU regulators question potential "circular financing," where NVIDIA's equity investments in companies (e.g., CoreWeave, OpenAI) facilitate those companies' purchases of NVIDIA hardware, potentially inflating revenue. Supporters view it as a necessary "virtuous cycle" to secure supply and demand in a compute-scarce market. While NVentures' smaller deals appear like traditional VC, its role within the larger, controversial investment framework remains a point of debate.

marsbit42 хв тому

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

marsbit42 хв тому

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit43 хв тому

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit43 хв тому

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1 год тому

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1 год тому

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn1 год тому

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси